Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: i subramaniam · Page 1 of about 61 results (0.071 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 10 2012

Karuppa Gounder Vs. D.Sekar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-10-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) 1860 - Sections 341, 323, 324, 294(b), 506(2), 120 B, 463, 464, 468, 109, 201,; Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 ; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) 1898 - Section 482, 6(2), 11, 13, 14, 18, 32, 39, 460 (e)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.I.Subramaniam, Adv.

Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to issue a direction to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Erode to entertain the complaint of the petitioner dated 08.02.2012 made in C.M.P.SR.No.625 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2002

J. Jayalalitha Vs. State Represented by Superintendent of Police, Spec ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-10-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1), 13(2) and 16; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 61, 158, 161, 166A, 169, 170, 173,173(1), 173(2), 173(6), 173(8), 218, 223, 319 and 482; General Clauses Act - Sections 3; (38);Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 33, 109 and 120B

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3026

Advocate for Respondent : I. Subramaniam, Public Prosecutor assisted by O. Srinath, ;R. Shanmugasundaram, Senior Counsel for N.R. Elango as Amicus Curiae

ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J.1.1. The aforesaid petitions raise an interesting but somewhat complex question for adjudication as to the procedure to be followed after the further investigation permitted under Section 173(8) of Code of Criminal Procedure with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1994

Ramachandran Vs. the Inspector of Police, H. 3 Police Station, Madras ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-18-1994

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994CriLJ3722

Advocate for Respondent : I. Subramaniam, Addl. Public Prosecutor

Mishra, J. 1. The petitioner's son, Venkat alias Venkatesan aged, according to him, about 16 years, has been detained under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 16 1996

Nallam Krishnaraya Babu and Others Vs. the State Rep. by Inspector of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-16-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397 and 401

Reported in : 1996CriLJ4484

Advocate for Respondent : I. Subramaniam, Addl. Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. This unnumbered revision petition has been filed against the endorsement of return made by learned Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Ulundurpet, on 10-5-1996, returning the petition filed by the petitioners herein against the proposed identification parade...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 1996

Krishnaswami Alias Chinnu Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-13-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 1996CriLJ3372

Advocate for Respondent : I. Subramaniam, Addl. Public Prosecutor

Arunachalam, J.1. Appellant Krishnaswami alias Chinnu was the sole accused in Sessions Case No. 20 of 1987 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. He was charged under Section 302, IPC on the allegation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2003

Rani D/O. Thanislas, Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary to ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 201, 302, 312, 323, 324, 366, 368, 376, 420, 504, 506 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 36, 55, 156, 173(2), 173(8) and 197; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6; ;Indian Railways Act - Sections 105 and 106

Reported in : 2003(3)CTC513

Advocate for Respondent : I. Subramaniam, Public prosecutor in W.As. 3128 to 3130/02 for respondents 1 to 7 and in W.As. 3214 and 3215/02 for respondents 2 to 7

B. Subhashan Reddy, C.J. 1. These 5 writ appeals emanate from the common order dated 3.10.2002, passed by the learned single Judge in W.P. Nos. 15595 of 1997 and batch. While there were 7 writ petitions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1993

Malar and Another Vs. Secretary to Government, Govt. of Tamil Nadu and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-14-1993

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994CriLJ1407

Advocate for Respondent : I. Subramaniam, Addl. P.P. and;K. Asokan, Addl. C.G.S.C.

Arunachalam, J. 1. Both these habeas corpus petition are disposed of together by a common order, since the petitioners in both these petitions are stated to be involved in the same ground case and the contentions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1993

Ravi and Etc. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu and Other

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-12-1993

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994CriLJ1486

Advocate for Respondent : I. Subramaniam, Addl. Public Prosecutor

Venkataswami, J.1. In these two writ petitions, the petitioners who have been detained under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 as bootleggers, have challanged their detentions, and they pray for quashing the orders of detention and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 1993

N. Ajimeer Khan Vs. District Collector and the District Magistrate, Ra ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-29-1993

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1995(1)ALT(Cri)144; 1994CriLJ2670

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. I. Subramaniam, Additional Public Prosecutor

Raju, J. 1. The above petitions were dealt with together since the ground basis for action against the detenus arise out of one and the same occurrence and the learned counsel appearing on either side made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1979

Soundarammal Vs. Sundara Mahalinga, Nadar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-26-1979

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 2.1(1), 13(I-A) and 23(1); Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1964; Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1974

Reported in : AIR1980Mad294; (1980)2MLJ121

Advocate for Respondent : I. Subramaniam, Adv.

1. This appeal is preferred against C. M. A. No. 69 of 1975 on the file of the District judge, Tirunelveli who disagreed with the order of dismissal made by the Subordinate judge, Tirunelveli in O....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial