Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: i m chagla · Page 1 of about 79 results (0.084 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 25 2007

Gopal L. Raheja of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitant and Vs. Vijay B. Raheja o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-2007

Subject : Company

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(3) and 7; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 82, 88 and 94; Specific Relief Act; Transfer of Property Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR288

Advocate for Respondent : N.H. Seervai, Adv., i/b., J. Sagar and Associates for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, ;I.M. Chagla, Sr. Adv. and ;L.C. Pereira, ;S.V. Doijode and ;Meenakshi Iyer, Advs., i/b., Doijode Associates for Responde

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. This appeal arises out of an order passed by a Learned Single Judge on 14th March 2005 while disposing of a Motion for interim relief in the suit. The Plaintiffs are in appeal....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 1976

In Re: Reshma Estate Private Ltd. and

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-27-1976

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 141

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR654; [1977]47CompCas447(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : I.M. Chagla, Adv.

Mridul, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners seek condonation of delay in filing the particulars of charge created by M/s. Reshma Estate Private Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the company') in their favour under an indenture...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 1991

Kishore Y. Patel and Others Vs. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-04-1991

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 186, 391, 397, 398 and 643; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 9 and 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1992Bom114; [1994]79CompCas53(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : I.M. Chagla,;J. Avaria and;Khambatta, Advs., i/b;M/s. Hariram & Co. and;S.F. Vajifdar

ORDER1. The plaintiffs are shareholders of Patel Engineering Company Ltd., the 1st defendant company in this suit. The defendants Nos.2 to 8 are also the shareholders of the 1st defendant company. There are two groups of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 18 1991

The Scotch Whiskhy Association and Another Vs. Pravara Sahakar Shakar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-18-1991

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 29; Companies Act, 1956; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1992Bom294; 1992(2)BomCR219

Advocate for Respondent : J.I. Mehta with;Virendra V. Tulzapurkar,;Dara P. Menta and;Sharad Abhyankar instructed by;M/s. Little and Co.;;I.M. Chagla with;Virag V. Tulzapurkar instructed by;M/s. Crawford Bayley and Co.

1. The 1st plaintiff is a company incorporated under the Companies Act of the United Kingdom with the object, inter alia, to protect and promote the interests of the scotch whisky trade generally, both in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2002

Eagle Copters Ltd. Vs. Azal Azerbaijan Aviation Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-01-2002

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR2002Bom284; 2002(3)BomCR758

Advocate for Respondent : I.M. Chagla, ;J.C. Pereira and ;R.A.K. Najam-e-Saini, Advs. (for No. 1) and ;Mustufa Doctor, Adv. i/b., S. Malik (for No. 2)

ORDERPratibha Upasani, J. 1. This notice of motion is taken out by the plaintiff Eagle Copters Ltd. praying that pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit, the defendants be ordered and directed to allow...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2014

Vital Nutraceuticals Private Limited Through Its Director, Ganesh Vith ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-28-2014

Subject : MRTP

G.S. Kulkarni, J. 1. I have had the privilege of going through the erudite judgment of my learned brother Mr.Justice V.M.Kanade. Having deliberated over the arguments advanced by the learned Counsel for contesting parties in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 1997

Bussa Overseas and Properties P. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-04-1997

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1997)(70)LC517Tri(Mum.)bai

1. These two appeals have been filed against the order dated 21.6.1996 passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise II, Mumbai by which the Commissioner has confirmed the demand of Rs. 2,26,08,2147- in respect of 29 consignments...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2002

AshwIn K. Doshi, Pankaj G. Joshi, Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Oct-25-2002

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The present appeal is against the order dated 19.7.2001 made by the Chairman of Respondent No.1, disposing of a complaint filed by Shri Ashwin Doshi & others. relating to acquisition of shares/alleged taking over of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2008

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-2008

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

Advocate for Respondent : Ravi Kadam, Adv. General and K.R. Belosey, G.P. K.K. Singhavi, Sr. Adv. with Priti Purandare, Adv. for respondent Municipal Corporation.in Writ Petition Nos. 1957 2937, 2093, 2111, 2930, 2985, 2752, 2

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. On 21st March, 2008, we observed world 'forest' day. On 23rd March, 2008 in Maharashtra we observed 'Tukaram Beej'. That is the day on which Saint Tukaram, a Seventeeth Century Poet, regarded by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 1992

Yashovardhan Saboo Vs. Groz-beckert Saboo Ltd. and ors.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Oct-22-1992

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1995)83CompCas371

1. This is a petition filed on January 22, 1992, under Section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956, by Shri Yashovardhan Saboo who holds 14,791 equity shares and supported by other 12 shareholders having 2,71,870 shares...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial