Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: harish behal · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.043 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 08 1996

State of H.P. Vs. Parkash Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-08-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Section 30; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 1997CriLJ1979

Advocate for Respondent : Harish Behal, Adv.

Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. Parkash Chand respondent, Smt. Saina Devi his mother and Tek Chand his brother have been acquitted by Shri Janeshwar Goel, Addl. Sessions Judge (1) Kangra Division at Dharamsala in Sessions Case No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2002

Smt. Padmo and ors. Vs. Surat Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-12-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Section 125 and 125(3); ;Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 32, 71 and 71(2)

Reported in : 2003CriLJ237,I(2003)DMC483

Advocate for Respondent : Harish Behal, Adv.

ORDERKamlesh Sharma, J. 1. This petition was registered on the complaint received by this Court from the petitioners on the administrative side.2. Respondent is the husband of petitioner No. 1 and father of minor petitioners Nos....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1989

Parveen Singh Vs. Kanchana Devi

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-01-1989

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1) and 23

Reported in : I(1990)DMC24

Advocate for Respondent : Harish Behal and; Om Parkash, Advs.

Bhawani Singh, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment of District Judge, Kangra, in H.M.A. No. 79 of 1983 decided on 27-3-1985 thereby dismissing the petition of the appellant under Section 13 of the Hindu...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 19 1991

Gurdas Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-19-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279, 304A, 337 and 338; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 154 and 313

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3538

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Bisht, Law Officer

ORDERKamlesh Sharma, J.1. This criminal revision, at the instance of the accused Gurdas Singh, is against the judgment dated 30-7-1988 passed by the Sessions Judge, Una, whereby the judgment dated 27-10-1987 of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Una,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2006

Sanjeev Gautam Vs. Surinder Kumar and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-18-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166 and 173; ;Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Section 95(1) and 95(2)

Reported in : II(2007)ACC132,2007ACJ813,2006(2)ShimLC279

Advocate for Respondent : C.B. Singh Adv. for Respondent No. 1,; Ashwani K. Sharma, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 and;

Deepak Gupta, J.1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act is directed against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Solan in MAC Petition No. 24-S/2 of 2001, decided on 25.3.2001.2. A...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 1989

Jito Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-31-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 376; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161 and 428

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1434

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Guleria, Asstt. Adv. General

Bhawani Singh, J.1. This appeal, by the accused, arises out of the judgment of Sessions Judge, Kangra Division, in Sessions Trial No. 11 of 1985 decided on 31-12-1985. In this case, under Section 376 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2009

Shri Dhan Bahadur Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-28-2009

Subject : Narcotics

Reported in : 2009(2)ShimLC203

Surinder Singh, J.1. The appellant has challenged the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned trial Court under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, in short 'the Act' for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 2000

Rajinder Kumar and ors. Vs. Soma Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-12-2000

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2001ACJ307

Advocate for Respondent : K.D. Sood and; Harish Behal, Advs.

Kamlesh Sharma, J.1. Appellant Nos. 1 (a) to 1 (e) are the legal representatives of original appellant No. 1, namely, Ram Nath, who died during the pendency of the appeal. He was owner and appellant No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1988

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Roshan Lal

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-28-1988

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 23(1A); ;Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 23, 30 and 30(1)

Reported in : AIR1989HP67

Advocate for Respondent : Harish Behal, Adv.

V.K. Mehrotra, J. 1. Some Property belonging to Roshan Lal, resident of village Sothal, Tikka Mann, was acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (for brief, 'the Act'), for construction of Pong Dam...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 1989

Joga Singh Vs. Gurdip Kaur

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-11-1989

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1A) and 23(1)

Reported in : II(1990)DMC59

Advocate for Respondent : Harish Behal, Adv. for; Om Prakash, Adv.

Bhawani Singh, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment of District Judge, Una, in Hindu Marriage Petition No. 27 of 1985 decided on 23-4-1986. By this judgment, a petition by the respondent under Section 13(1-A)(ii)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial