Advanced Search Results
Antony Eugene Pinto and ors. Vs. Eugene Cajetan Pinto and anr.
Mumbai
Sep-15-2008
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 65 and 113; Specific Relief Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 35 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 14, Rule 2 - Order 20, Rule 13(1)
2009(1)BomCR828
Haresh Mansukhani and ;A.B. Shreekhande, Advs.
Dalvi Roshan, J.1. This Suit has been directed to be tried along with and immediately after the Testamentary Suit No. 5 of 2004 is disposed of granting or refusing letters of Administration with the last Will...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPulsar International Ltd. Vs. Prime Investrade Finance Services Ltd.
Mumbai
May-06-2004
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434
2004(6)BomCR236; [2005]127CompCas579(Bom); (2004)4CompLJ397(Bom); [2004]55SCL32(Bom)
Haresh Mansukhani, Adv.
ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. Petitioner-company viz. M/s. Pulsar International Limited having its registered office at Jaishree, 28, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Vakola, Santacruz (East), Mumbai 400057, has invoked the provisions of Sections 433, 434 and 439 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbeda Iqbal Patel Vs. Cormorant Investment Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai
Dec-10-2008
Tenancy
Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 34 and 34(4); Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 29(3); Evidence Act - Sections 58; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 and 151 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 8, Rule 5 - Order 12, Rule 6; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976
2009(3)BomCR338; 2009(2)MhLj446
Haresh Mansukhani, Adv.
Mohta Anoop V., J.1. The petitioner-original defendant has challenged the impugned order dated 7th July, 2008 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small Causes Court at Bombay, whereby, against an order in interim notice 2014/2007 dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›