Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: haradhan banerjee and · Page 1 of about 86 results (0.060 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 28 2000

Pankaj Kumar Ghosh Vs. Chunilal Das and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-28-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 227;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 and 115A

Reported in : (2001)1CALLT419(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Haradhan Banerjee and ;Mr. Sandip Das, Advs.

G.C. De. J.1. This hearing arose out of an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed at the instance of Pankaj Kumar Ghosh, plaintiff-decree holder opposite parties against an order dated 7.8.95 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2005

Pranab Kumar Chakraborty Vs. Kumkum Chakraborty

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-05-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 342 and 498A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 97

Reported in : (2006)1CALLT210(HC),2005(4)CHN146

Advocate for Respondent : Haradhan Banerjee, ;Subrata Roy Karmakar and ;Nani Gopal Chakraborty, Advs.

1. The appellant has filed this application for review of the judgment and decree dated 25* of April, 2003 in FA No. 12 of 2001. Mr. Dasgupta in support of the review application had contended that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2004

Jatindra Nath Mondal and ors. Vs. Sm. Harimoti Dassi and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-18-2004

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 105; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 64 and 65

Reported in : AIR2004Cal188,(2004)2CALLT10(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Haradhan Banerjee, ;Monoranjan Das and ;Syamasri Das, Advs.

A. Lala, J.1. This is a dispute between brother and sister. The brother originally instituted a suit as against the sister in 1987 allegedly terminating the licence of the sister in occupying the portion of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 11 2003

Md. Akhtar HossaIn Vs. Suresh Singh and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-11-2003

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 21, Rules 97 and 101; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 14

Reported in : AIR2004Cal99

Advocate for Respondent : Haradhan Banerjee and ;Amitava Pain, Advs.

Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. This Second Appeal arises out of the decision of the learned Assistant District Judge; First Court at Howrah in Title Appeal No. 169 of 1990 passed on 23rd Dec. 1993 affirming the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2001

Gagandeep Pratishthan Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Mechano and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-20-2001

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2002SC204; 2001(6)ALT63(SC); JT2001(9)SC591; (2002)2PLR352; 2001(8)SCALE205; (2002)1SCC475

Advocate for Respondent : Haradhan Banerjee and ; V.D. Khanna, Advs.

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. By the impugned orders, the High Court appointed a Receiver to ascertain the availability of 1040 sq. ft. of floor space in the building in question. By the said order, it also restrained...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2005

Gulshan Bibi Vs. Hasmat Ali and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-14-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 41, Rules 23, 23A, 25 and 27 - Order 43 Rule 1; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2005(2)CHN667

Advocate for Respondent : Haradhan Banerjee and ;K. Vijay Kumar, Advs. for respondent No. 1

Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J.1. This is an appeal against an order of remand.2. This case has a chequered history. Certain facts are necessary to appreciate the points involved in this appeal.3. The plaintiff on or about...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1996

Puspa Mondal Vs. Nirmala Mondal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-20-1996

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 22 Rule 4; ; Indian Succession Act - Section 306

Reported in : I(1997)DMC222

Advocate for Respondent : Haradhan Banerjee, ; Sambhu Nath Samanta and ; Subrata Roy Karmakar, Advs.

Basudeva Panigrahi, J.1. This revision is directed against Order No. 30 dated 29th June, 1994 passed by the District Judge. Howrah on an application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the C.P.C. allowing the opposite party...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2010

Gopinath Pal and ors Vs. Smt. Chyana Patra

Court : Kolkata Appellate

Decided on : Dec-09-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Haradhan Banerjee; Mr. Amitava Pyne, Advs

1. This Second Appeal was filed by the defendant / tenant against judgment and decree dated 3rd May, 1991 passed by learned Second Assistant District Judge, Howrah in Title Appeal No.94 of 1990 reversing the judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 1993

Minor Subir Ranjan Mondal Vs. Sita Nath Mukherjee

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-14-1993

Subject : LimitationProperty

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 to 25, 29, 29(2), 51A, 51(A)(5), 54, 92 and 93 - Schedule - Article 137;; West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 9 and 9(6);; West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955;; West Bengal Land Reforms (Bargadars) Rules, 1956 - Rules 2A and 8;; West Bengal Land Reforms Rules, 1965 - Rule 26;; Representation of the People Act;; West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1972;; Indian Telegraph Act - Section 16(3);; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 57, 141 and 148 - Order 41;; Bengal Tenancy Act - Section 26F;; Andhra Pradesh Telenghana Area Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417, 480 and 482;; West Bengal co-operative Societies Act, 1940 - Section 133A(2);; Motor Vehi

Reported in : AIR1994Cal166,98CWN544

Advocate for Respondent : Haradhan Banerjee for Opposite Party

ORDER1. Whether S. 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable to an 'application' u/S. 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is the question that needs to be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 1994

Dr. Narayan Mukherjee Vs. Smt. Krishna Dey (Mukherjee)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-22-1994

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 73; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 151 - Order 9, Rule 13; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5

Reported in : (1996)2CALLT28(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Haradhan Banerjee, Adv.

1. The husband/petitioner filled Matrimonial Suit No. 47 of 1992 in the 4th Court of the learned Additional District Judge at Alipore, South, 24-Parganas, against the wife/caveator/opposite party for a decree for divorce on the ground...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial