Advanced Search Results
Ganapa Rama Hegde Vs. Timmaya Narayan Hegde
Mumbai
Sep-01-1941
Property
(1942)44BOMLR111
Broomfield, J.1. The facts are stated in the judgments of the lower Courts. The question for decision in this second appeal reduced to its essentials may be stated in this way. A mortgages property to B...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhasIn Associates Ltd. Vs. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. and anr.
Delhi
Nov-15-1991
Contract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126
1992(22)DRJ238
Sat Pal, J.(1) This appeal is directed against the order dated 4th April, 1991 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in is 11649/90 in Suit No. 3908/90.(2) The facts which are relevant for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArab Ali Khan Vs. Mahmud Ali Khan
Mumbai
Jan-14-1922
PropertyLimitation
(1922)24BOMLR951
Atkinson, J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment and decree, dated November 10, 1915, of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which reversed a judgment and decree, dated April 30, 1913, of the Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Har Prasad Vs. Sukhdevi Kunwar
Allahabad
Feb-02-1915
Family
AIR1915All180; 28Ind.Cas.561
1. This is a defendant's appeal arising out of a suit for possession brought by the widow of the defendant's deceased brother, Ganga pershad, for recovery of her husband's separate estates, plus mesne profits. The Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagat Chandra De Vs. Abdul Rashid and ors.
Kolkata
Jul-12-1934
Property
AIR1935Cal139
1. The facts which are relevant for the purposes of the present appeal and which are in dispute now are as follows: One Dasarath De, who is defendant 6 in the present suit, mortgaged the disputed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPirthi Raj Vs. the State
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-02-1957
Other TaxesCriminal
Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 103(1) and 103(2)
AIR1958P& H396; 1958CriLJ1343
Har Pershad, Adv.
D. Falshaw, J.1. This is a revision petition filed by Prithi Raj who has been convicted by a Magistrate at Jullundur under Section 103(2) of the. Cantonments Act and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThakur Rajindra Bahadur Singh Vs. Rani Raghubans Kunwar
Mumbai
Feb-25-1918
PropertyFamily
(1918)20BOMLR1075
John Edge, J.1. The suit in which these consolidated appeals have arisen came on appeal before the Board in 1905. The Board which heard the appeal finally decided several important questions which were in dispute between...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKunwar Partab Singh Vs. Bhabuti Singh
Mumbai
Jul-23-1913
Civil
(1913)15BOMLR1001
John Edge, J.1. The suit in which this appeal from a decree of the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Oudh has arisen was brought by Kunwar Partab Singh and Kunwar Ahbaran Singh in the Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMonohar Lal and anr. Vs. Ram Babu
Allahabad
Feb-07-1912
PropertyCivil
(1912)ILR34All323
Henry Richards, C.J. and Banerji, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit in which the plaintiff sought to realize the amount of a mortgage, dated the 4th of June, 1877, by sale of the mortgaged...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishan Dayal and ors. Vs. Har Prasad and ors.
Allahabad
May-24-1910
Contract
7Ind.Cas.287
Karamat Husain, J.1. The facts of the case are these:--According to paragraph 5 of the plaint, the plaintiffs' shop, on the 31st December, 1907, purchased 200 bags of bajra through the defendants' agency and directed them...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »