Advanced Search Results

Official Liquidator Vs. Surya Partap Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 454, 454(2) and 454(5)

Reported in : [1996]86CompCas134(P& H); (1996)112PLR669

Advocate for Respondent : L.M. Suri, Senior Adv. and; Deepak Suri, Adv., for respondent No. 1 and I.K. Mehta, Senior Adv. and;

G.C. Garg, J.1. This criminal complaint has been filed by the official liquidator under Sub-section (5) of Section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act'), against Surya Partap Singh, Mukta Devi and Pardip...

Jit Singh Mohar Singh Vs. Municipal Committee and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1961CriLJ272

ORDERI.D. Dua, J.1. This case has been reported by the learned Sessions Judge, Ludiana, with a recommendation that the conviction and sentence of the petitioner be set aside and he be acquitted. The facts as appear...

Mohinder Partap Singh Vs. Director Health Services, Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1952 - Rule 14; Constitution of India - Article 20(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 403

Reported in : AIR1956P& H81

Advocate for Respondent : Har Parshad, A.A.G.

ORDERKapur, J.1. This is a rule obtained by the petitioner Mohinder Partap Singh for the issue of a writ of mandamus against the State directing them to withdraw directions for fresh enquiry and to respondent 1...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Har Parshad and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143, 143(3), 144, 146 and 148

Reported in : [1989]178ITR591(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : None

K.S. Bhalla, J.1. On an application under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the Act'), by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Haryana and Chandigarh, Rohtak, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, has referred...

Dr. Santosh Kumar Jha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Manoj Ohri

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 211 of 2008 Reserved on: July 25, 2014 Decision on: August 20, 2014 DR. SANTOSH KUMAR JHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sinha, Mr. Anil Singh,...

Sikander @ Mohd. Shafi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 354(3)

Reported in : 1992(2)Crimes970; 1992(24)DRJ295; ILR1993Delhi40

Mohd. Shamim, J.(1) This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5.8.91/9.8.91 passed by Shri S.M. Aggarwal learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby he found the appellant guilty under Section 302 of the Indian Penal...

Manni Ram Vs. Bishan Dial and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All297

1. Sarab Sukh Rai, the original proprietor of mauza Barauli, died in 1844, leaving a widow, Ram Kuar, and three sons, Sheo Dial, Gulab Rai, and Bishan Dial. In 1864 Sheo Dial, who appears to have...

The State Vs. Amir Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Article 246

Reported in : AIR1953P& H1

Advocate for Respondent : Hem Raj Mahajan and; C.L. Aggarwal, Advs.

Bhandari, J.1. The short point for decision in the present case is whether it was within the competence of the Rationing Controller of Ambala to make an order requiring certain persons to submit certain returns. The...

Mani Ram and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Public Gambling Act, 1867 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6

Reported in : AIR1954P& H164

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Doabia, Adv. for;Adv. General

Khosla, J.1. This case was referred to a Division Bench by my brother Soni J. because he felt that the principles governing the interpretation of Section 6 of the Public Gambling Act refluired to be stated...

Sampuran Singh Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 198; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 499 to 500

Reported in : AIR1953P& H82

Advocate for Respondent : Har Parshad, Asst. Adv. General

ORDERFalshaw, J.1. This is a revision petition by Sampuran Singh who was convicted under Section 500, Penal Code, by a Magistrate of Jagadhri and sentenced to three months simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/-...