Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: h s dubey · Page 1 of about 46 results (0.100 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 12 2001

Uma Aarsay and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-12-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 437(1), (2), 438, 439 and 439(1); Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1) and 18; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 326 and 506

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT436; 2002(3)MPLJ226

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Ahluwalia, Govt. Adv. in M.Cr.C. No. 5981/2001 and ;H.S. Dubey, Adv.

N.S. Azad, J. 1. This order shall dispose of M.Cr.C. No. 6362/2001 filed on behalf of the petitioner (State) so also M.Cr.C. No. 5981/2001, filed on behalf of Uma Aarsay, the complainant, as in both of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1991

Amarchand Vs. Arun Kumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-27-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 409 and 494; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 204(2), 311 and 482; ;Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1991CriLJ3001

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Dubey, Adv.

ORDERB.M. Lal, J.1. The order passed in this Criminal Revision No. 281 of 1990 shall also dispose of Misc. Criminal Case No. 2265 of 1990 (Arun Kumar Jain v. Amarchand Jain).2. The applicant Amarchand filed a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2005

Sunder Lal Soni Vs. Smt. Namita Jain

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-17-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Courts Act, 1983 - Sections 19; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 12 and 12(1); Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Act, 1976; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR2006MP51

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Dubey, Adv.

1. In this appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1983, the non-applicant/appellant has called in question the defensibility of the judgment dated 21st day of September 2004 passed by the learned Judge, Family...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 15 2005

Raghuraj Pratap Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-15-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 3(3), 4, 32, 32(1), 32(5), 34, 49, 49(6) to 49(9), 52 and 60; Uttar Pradesh Gangster and and Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 2(1) and 3; Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act - Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act - Sections 20; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 37; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120, 120B, 201, 302, 320, 364 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161 and 439; Arms Act; Explosives Act; Prevention of Terrorism Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)MPHT222

Advocate for Respondent : T.S. Ruprah, ;R.S. Patel, Addl. Advs. General, ;Surendra Singh, Sr. Adv. and ;Pratulya Shandilya, Adv. for ;Awdhesh Pratap Shukla, Adv.

1. In this appeal preferred under Section 34 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (for brevity 'the POTA') the defensibility and pregnability of the order dated 29-11-2005 passed by the Special Court under the POTA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2003

Rakesh and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-18-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 389; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 380 and 457

Reported in : 2003(4)MPHT319

Advocate for Respondent : Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer

ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J. 1. This revision has been filed against the order dated 2-7-2003 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadarwara in Criminal Appeal (unregistered) 2003, whereby the sentence of conviction passed by the Trial Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2004

Mohan Lal and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-16-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B

Reported in : 2005CriLJ16; 2004(4)MPLJ143

S.L. Jain, J.1. Appellants Mohan Lal, Rajendra and Shakuntala Bai stand convicted for offence punishable under Section 304B, IPC and sentenced to R. I. for ten years each, by the impugned judgment and order dated 29-9-1994,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2012

Kammu @ Kamlesh Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-26-2012

Subject : Criminal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.2517/1997 Kammu @ Kamlesh VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri H.S.Dubey, counsel for the appellant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2013

Jai Prakash Lodhi and ors. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2013

Subject : Criminal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.561/2001 Komal Prasad Dhimolay VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh Criminal Appeal No.589/2001 Jai Prakash Lodhi & others VERSUS State...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2013

Komal Prasad Dhimoley Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2013

Subject : Criminal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.561/2001 Komal Prasad Dhimolay VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh Criminal Appeal No.589/2001 Jai Prakash Lodhi & others VERSUS State...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2012

Manoj Kumar Jaat Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-22-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 W.P.No.7070/2009 Manot Kumar Jaat versus State of M.P.& ORS.22.06.2012 Shri H.S.Dubey learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Puneet Shroti, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondent/State. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial