Advanced Search Results
Uma Aarsay and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-12-2001
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 437(1), (2), 438, 439 and 439(1); Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1) and 18; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 326 and 506
2002(1)MPHT436; 2002(3)MPLJ226
G.S. Ahluwalia, Govt. Adv. in M.Cr.C. No. 5981/2001 and ;H.S. Dubey, Adv.
N.S. Azad, J. 1. This order shall dispose of M.Cr.C. No. 6362/2001 filed on behalf of the petitioner (State) so also M.Cr.C. No. 5981/2001, filed on behalf of Uma Aarsay, the complainant, as in both of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmarchand Vs. Arun Kumar
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-27-1991
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 409 and 494; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 204(2), 311 and 482; ;Constitution of India - Article 21
1991CriLJ3001
H.S. Dubey, Adv.
ORDERB.M. Lal, J.1. The order passed in this Criminal Revision No. 281 of 1990 shall also dispose of Misc. Criminal Case No. 2265 of 1990 (Arun Kumar Jain v. Amarchand Jain).2. The applicant Amarchand filed a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunder Lal Soni Vs. Smt. Namita Jain
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-17-2005
Family
Family Courts Act, 1983 - Sections 19; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 12 and 12(1); Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Act, 1976; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976
AIR2006MP51
H.S. Dubey, Adv.
1. In this appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1983, the non-applicant/appellant has called in question the defensibility of the judgment dated 21st day of September 2004 passed by the learned Judge, Family...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Raghuraj Pratap Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-15-2005
Criminal
Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 3(3), 4, 32, 32(1), 32(5), 34, 49, 49(6) to 49(9), 52 and 60; Uttar Pradesh Gangster and and Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 2(1) and 3; Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act - Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act - Sections 20; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 37; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120, 120B, 201, 302, 320, 364 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161 and 439; Arms Act; Explosives Act; Prevention of Terrorism Rules
2006(1)MPHT222
T.S. Ruprah, ;R.S. Patel, Addl. Advs. General, ;Surendra Singh, Sr. Adv. and ;Pratulya Shandilya, Adv. for ;Awdhesh Pratap Shukla, Adv.
1. In this appeal preferred under Section 34 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (for brevity 'the POTA') the defensibility and pregnability of the order dated 29-11-2005 passed by the Special Court under the POTA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-18-2003
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 389; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 380 and 457
2003(4)MPHT319
Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer
ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J. 1. This revision has been filed against the order dated 2-7-2003 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadarwara in Criminal Appeal (unregistered) 2003, whereby the sentence of conviction passed by the Trial Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Lal and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-16-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B
2005CriLJ16; 2004(4)MPLJ143
S.L. Jain, J.1. Appellants Mohan Lal, Rajendra and Shakuntala Bai stand convicted for offence punishable under Section 304B, IPC and sentenced to R. I. for ten years each, by the impugned judgment and order dated 29-9-1994,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKammu @ Kamlesh Vs. the State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Jun-26-2012
Criminal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.2517/1997 Kammu @ Kamlesh VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri H.S.Dubey, counsel for the appellant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai Prakash Lodhi and ors. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-03-2013
Criminal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.561/2001 Komal Prasad Dhimolay VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh Criminal Appeal No.589/2001 Jai Prakash Lodhi & others VERSUS State...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKomal Prasad Dhimoley Vs. the State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-03-2013
Criminal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.561/2001 Komal Prasad Dhimolay VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh Criminal Appeal No.589/2001 Jai Prakash Lodhi & others VERSUS State...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManoj Kumar Jaat Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jun-22-2012
Land Acquisition
1 W.P.No.7070/2009 Manot Kumar Jaat versus State of M.P.& ORS.22.06.2012 Shri H.S.Dubey learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Puneet Shroti, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondent/State. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »