Advanced Search Results

Raj Kumar and Others Vs. State Board of Technical Education, Punjab Ch ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 162

Reported in : AIR1991P& H1

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Bedi, Adv. General Punjab

ORDERNaresh Chander Jain, J.1. Thenecessary facts in order to appreciate the questions of law lie in a narrow compass and may thus be noticed.2. The petitioners sought admission in 1st year of Pharmacy Diploma Course in...

Dr. Ashutosh Kaushal Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1990P& H187

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Bedi and; S.K. Sharma, Addl. Adv. General,; J.L. Gu

ORDER1. In this petition filed under Art. 226 and 227 of the Constitution the short question involved is as to whether the policy decision of the State Government dated 11th January, 1962 (Annexure P-4), providing reservation...

Ved Paul Anand Vs. Chief Controller of Imports and Exports

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Contract

Acts : Imports and Exports (Control) Act - Sections 4(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Imports and Exports (Control) Order, 1955

Reported in : 1984(15)ELT113(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Bedi, Adv.

Surinder Singh, J.1. By means of this Writ Petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to impugn and obtain a direction quashing the impugned orders Annexures P/7 and P/9 passed...

Ranjit Ice and General Mills and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Punjab Ice Price Control Act, 1968 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1), 226 and 227

Reported in : (1990)98PLR346

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Bedi, A.G.

K.P. Bhandari, J. 1. The petitioner by way of the present writ petition has challenged the constitutional validity of the Punjab Ice Price Control Act, 1968 (Punjab Act No. 13 of 1968) (hereinafter referred to as...

Hony/CaptaIn Surinder Singh Sandhu (Retd.) Vs. State of Punjab and ors ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226 and 227

Reported in : (1990)97PLR259

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Bedi, A.G. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and; Nand Lal, Adv. for;

S.S. Sodhi, J.1. A Junior Commissioned Officer granted an Honorary Commission as Officer in the Indian Army, whether during service or after retirement, is he to be deemed to be an fix-Commissioned Officer of the Armed...

Punjab Istri Sabha and ors. Vs. Shri Surjit Singh Barnala, Chief Minis ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 21, 38, 226 and 300(A)

Reported in : 1990ACJ1064; (1990)97PLR493

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Bedi, A.G.

S.D. Bajaj, J.1. Punjab Istri Sabha through its President and Secretary has approached this Court in public interest litigation obtaining in C. W. P. No. 4340 of 1986 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

Raj Kumar Vs. the State of Punjab Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23; Urban Land (Celling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 11

Reported in : (1990)97PLR662

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Bedi, D.A.G.

Jai Singh Sekhon, J.1. This judgment will dispose of R. F. A. Nos. 710, 755, 756, 757, 607 and 779 of 1981, as these arise out of the same award of the learned Additional District Judge,...

Kifayat HussaIn Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : RLW2008(4)Raj3695

ORDERDinesh Maheshwari, J.1. By way of this writ petition, while putting a challenge to the phraseology of Rule 7(1) of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Medical Attendance) Rules, 1970 ('the Rules of 1970'), the petitioner has prayed...

State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Uttam Vishnu Pawar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR(SC)447; 2008(5)BomCR429; [2008(116)FLR788]; JT2008(2)SC80; 2008(6)MhLj757; (2008)2MLJ911(SC); 2008(1)SCALE538; (2008)2SCC646; 2008AIRSCW937; 2008LABIC1689

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Karanjakar, ; Venkateshwara Rao Anumolu, ; V.D. Bhav

ORDER1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Delay condoned in SLP(C) No. 20630/2006.Leave granted in the special leave petitions.2. All these appeals involve similar question of law therefore they are clubbed together and are being disposed...

R. Kalavathi Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985

Reported in : JT2006(6)SC69; 2006(6)SCALE385; (2006)6SCC14

Advocate for Respondent : V. Krishnamurthy, Adv.

Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Madras High Court dismissing the Habeas Corpus Petition filed by the appellant seeking release...