Advanced Search Results
Smt. Kanthamma Vs. the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Karnataka Ind ...
Karnataka
Jan-16-2003
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Article 117; Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 - Sections 4
2003(2)KarLJ7
H.R. Krishnamurthy, Adv. for Respondent-1
ORDERN.K. Jain, C.J.1. This writ appeal is filed against the order dated 28-5-2001 passed in W.P. No. 186 of 2001 (LA), wherein, the learned Single Judge has found that the Special Land Acquisition Officer has considered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarish Textile Enggs. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
May-05-1995
Excise
(1995)(79)ELT277Tri(Mum.)bai
1. Though, this day, only stay application was listed for hearing, after hearing both the sides, I find that the issue falls within a short compass and hence I have decided to take up the appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPeico Electronics and Vs. Collector of Cus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jun-30-1995
Customs
(1995)(79)ELT713Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This appeal is directed against the order-in-Appeal No. 1008/90 BCH, dated 5-7-1990 of the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay, confirming the Order-in-Original No. S/10-226/89IV, dated 4-12-1990 of Asst. Collector of Customs, Bombay, ordering confiscation of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Safex Fire Services Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Sep-25-1995
Excise
(1995)LC576Tri(Mum.)bai
1. Though this day, only stay application was listed for hearing, after hearing both the sides, since the matter calls for a remand, the appeal itself was taken up for disposal granting waiver of pre-deposit of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs Vs. Hi Lingos Co. Ltd. and anr.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Nov-15-1995
Customs
(1996)(63)LC617Tri(Mum.)bai
1. Both the Reference Applications have been brought by the Revenue against this Bench Order No. 1695/93-WRB dt. 20.9.1993 and No.1953/93-WRB dated 14.10.1993. In both the cases, the Respondents (appellants in the original appeal) were foreign...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew Kashiram Textile Mills Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Oct-01-1996
Excise
(1998)(99)ELT567Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This appeal is directed against order-in-appeal cited above confirming Order-in-Original No. 3/86, dated 22-12-1986.2. Some processed goods were being removed from the factory premises of the appellants and the description in the gate pass indicated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs Vs. Atmaram J Vagela
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Oct-25-1996
Land Acquisition
(1998)(100)ELT400Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These are applications by the Deptt. for staying the operation of the impugned order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai whereby he has allowed the appeal of the respondents herein holding that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askshri.h.r. Krishnamurthy S/O Ramulu Vs. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka Dharwad
Apr-13-2018
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE13T H DAY OF APRIL, 2018 R BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.101601 of 2018 (EXCISE-EC) BETWEEN: SHRI.H.R. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O RAMULU AGE:56. YEARS,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›