Advanced Search Results

Ram Autar Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Police Act

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2923; [2000(87)FLR160]; (2001)ILLJ276All

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;H.P. Tripathi, Adv.

D.S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Vijai Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri H.P. Tripathi, learned standing counsel of the State of U. P., representing the respondent Nos. 1. 2, 3 and 6.2. On...

indrapal Vs. Shankar Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sahkari Krishi and Gram Vikas Banks Act, 1964 - Sections 22

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC664; (2002)1UPLBEC556

Advocate for Respondent : H.P. Tripathi, Adv.

J.C. Gupta, J.1. Heard Sri Faujdar Rai for defendant-appellant and Sri H. P. Tripathi for plaintiff-respondent.2. This second appeal is by defendant against whom respondent filed suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale of...

Mohan Lal Sharma Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 309 and 342; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 82 and 83

Reported in : 1988(3)Crimes122(SC); JT1988(3)SC332; 1988(2)SCALE278; (1989)2SCC600; 1988(2)LC601(SC)

R.S. Pathak, CJI1. A telegram was received by this Court from the petitioner, Mohan Lal Sharma stating that his son Sanjay, aged 17 years, was arrested by the Agra Police on 10 October 1986 at 9...

Kamal Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dacoity Affected Area Act, 1986 - Sections 10; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 437, 437(1), 437(6), 437(7) and 439; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307 and 392; Arms Act - Sections 4 and 25

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1721

Advocate for Respondent : Standing Counsel

ORDERG.D. Dubey, J. 1. The above case arises from district which is covered by the Dacoity Affected Area Act, 1986 which shall hereinafter be referred to as Act. In this case an objection has been raised...

Chinubhai Haridas Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalLabour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 36(3) and 36(4)

Reported in : AIR1960SC37; (1960)62BOMLR117; 1960CriLJ141; [1960(1)FLR333]; (1960)ILLJ572SC; [1960]1SCR654

Wanchoo, J.1. This appeal by special leave against the judgment of the Bombay High Court raises the question of the interpretation of sub-ss. (3) and (4) of s. 36 of the Factories Act, (LXIII of 1948),...

Dr. A.P. Paliwal Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Education

1. This reference arises out of a doubt expressed by a Division Bench about the correctness of the judgements noted therein on the proposition relating to addition of services as a Teacher in a Government School...