Advanced Search Results
SatyanaraIn Vs. Bajranglal
Rajasthan
Jul-28-1975
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 16, Rule 19 - Order 26, Rule 4
AIR1976Raj211
H.M. Pareek, Adv.
ORDERM.L. Joshi, J. 1. This revision petition is directed against the order of the Additional Munsif Bhilwara dated 16th of January, 1975, whereby he refused to issue commission for the examination of the three witnesses residing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Singh Amar Singh and Co. Vs. Hindustan Zinc Limited and ors.
Rajasthan
Dec-11-1991
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 20 and 39; Rajasthan Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1961; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23
AIR1992Raj82; 1992(1)WLC405; 1991WLN(UC)378
H.M. Pareek and; B.R. Bhandari, Advs.
B.R. Arora, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated November 9, 1990, passed by the District Judge, Udaipur, by which the learned District Judge disposed of the application under Section 20 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. A.K. Ghosh
Madhya Pradesh
May-05-2003
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(14)
(2003)184CTR(MP)420; [2003]263ITR536(MP)
H.S. Shrivastava, Adv. in I.T.A. Nos. 19, 32 of 1999 and 52 and 54 of 2000, ;Sumit Nema, Adv. in I.T.A. Nos. 23, 27 and 44 of 1999 and 53, 55 and 98 of 2000
Dipak Misra, J.1. In this batch of appeals preferred under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), the Revenue has called in question the legal propriety of the orders passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cit Vs. A.K. Ghosh
Madhya Pradesh
May-05-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]131TAXMAN124(MP)
Mr. Sumit Nema
ORDERDipak Misra, J.In this batch of appeals preferred under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') the revenue has called in question the legal propriety of the orders passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. P.N. Tewari, Lic of India
Rajasthan
Aug-12-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]131TAXMAN295(Raj)
On an application filed under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur, has referred the following question for our opinion :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.P. Khunteta Vs. Cit
Rajasthan
Aug-07-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]124TAXMAN420(Raj)
ORDEROn an application filed under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Tribunal has referred the following questions for our opinion :'1. Whether, on the facts and in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›