Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: h m pareek · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.055 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 28 1975

SatyanaraIn Vs. Bajranglal

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-28-1975

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 16, Rule 19 - Order 26, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1976Raj211

Advocate for Respondent : H.M. Pareek, Adv.

ORDERM.L. Joshi, J. 1. This revision petition is directed against the order of the Additional Munsif Bhilwara dated 16th of January, 1975, whereby he refused to issue commission for the examination of the three witnesses residing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1991

Vijay Singh Amar Singh and Co. Vs. Hindustan Zinc Limited and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-11-1991

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 20 and 39; Rajasthan Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1961; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR1992Raj82; 1992(1)WLC405; 1991WLN(UC)378

Advocate for Respondent : H.M. Pareek and; B.R. Bhandari, Advs.

B.R. Arora, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated November 9, 1990, passed by the District Judge, Udaipur, by which the learned District Judge disposed of the application under Section 20 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2003

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. A.K. Ghosh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-05-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(14)

Reported in : (2003)184CTR(MP)420; [2003]263ITR536(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Shrivastava, Adv. in I.T.A. Nos. 19, 32 of 1999 and 52 and 54 of 2000, ;Sumit Nema, Adv. in I.T.A. Nos. 23, 27 and 44 of 1999 and 53, 55 and 98 of 2000

Dipak Misra, J.1. In this batch of appeals preferred under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), the Revenue has called in question the legal propriety of the orders passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 05 2003

Cit Vs. A.K. Ghosh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-05-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]131TAXMAN124(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sumit Nema

ORDERDipak Misra, J.In this batch of appeals preferred under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') the revenue has called in question the legal propriety of the orders passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2002

Cit Vs. P.N. Tewari, Lic of India

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-12-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]131TAXMAN295(Raj)

On an application filed under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur, has referred the following question for our opinion :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2002

R.P. Khunteta Vs. Cit

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-07-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]124TAXMAN420(Raj)

ORDEROn an application filed under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Tribunal has referred the following questions for our opinion :'1. Whether, on the facts and in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial