Advanced Search Results

Ashirvad Enterprises and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct TaxationCriminal

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245C, 245(D)(1), 245(D)(4), 245H, 245H(1A), 245H(2) and 276C; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.PC), 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Finance Act, 1987

Reported in : 2004(2)BLJR888; 2004CriLJ3110; (2004)187CTR(SC)609; 2004(168)ELT433(SC); [2004]266ITR578(SC); [2004(2)JCR213(SC)]; JT2004(4)SC6; 2004(3)SCALE515; (2004)3SCC624

Advocate for Respondent : H.L. Agrawal, Sr. Adv., ; Kumar Rajesh Singh and ; B.B. Singh

Arijit Pasayat, J. 1 Prosecution was launched against the appellants for alleged concealment of income and thereby willfully attempting to evade tax, and for making false statement on verification in terms of Sections 276C of the...

Madan Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(4), 3(5) and 19; Indian Penal, 1860 - Sections 124A, 141, 149, 302, 307, 324, 326, 352, 353, 379, 411 and 414; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 25(1B), 27 and 35; ;Juvenile Justice Care Protection of Children Act, 2000; Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD(Cri)10; 2004(2)BLJR930; 2004CriLJ2862; JT2004(4)SC294; 2004(4)SCALE135; (2004)4SCC622

Advocate for Respondent : H.L. Agrawal, Sr. Adv., ; Kumar Rajesh Singh and ; B.B. Singh

Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. In this appeal under Section 19 of Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (in short the 'TADA Act') the appellants question their conviction for offences punishable under Section 302 read with...

Jinia KeotIn and ors. Vs. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 16(1), 16(2) and 16(3); Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 16; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2288(SC); 2003(51)BLJR682; (SCSuppl)2003(2)CHN116; I(2003)DMC1SC; JT2002(10)SC571; 2003(1)KLT348(SC); (2003)1SCC730; [2002]SUPP5SCR689; 2003(1)LC215(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : H.L. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. and ; K.K. Gupta (N.P.), Adv.

D. Raju, J.1. The plaintiff (1st respondent herein) filed the suit claiming for 1/6th share in Schedules A to D properties and 1/3rd share in Schedule E properties. From the indisputable facts on record, the ancestral...

Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Shahdeo Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 30A and 32; Bihar Land Reforms(Validation and Amendment) Act, 1974 - Sections 1 and 6; Andhra Pradesh Panchayats Samithis and Zilla Parishads Act, 1959 - Sections 62 and 72; All India Services(Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16A; Public Demand Recovery Act; Uttar Pradesh Temporary Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1999SC3609; JT1999(8)SC45; 1999(6)SCALE393; (1999)8SCC16; [1999]Supp3SCR518

Advocate for Respondent : H.L. Agrawal, Adv. and ; Rajesh, Adv. for ; B.B. Singh, Ad

ORDERS.N. Phukan, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 9.5.90 passed by the Division Bench of Patna High Court, Ranchi Bench in L.P.A. No. 133 of 1989 (R). By impugned judgment the...

Prem Kumar and anr. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act

Reported in : 1995(1)BLJR559; 1995CriLJ2634; JT1995(3)SC123; 1995(2)SCALE50; (1995)3SCC228; [1995]2SCR455

Advocate for Respondent : H.L. Agrawal and ; B.B. Singh, Advs.

K.S. Paripoornan, J.1. The appellants in this appeal, Prem Kumar Singh (a), Prem Singh S/o Mundrika Singh and Ramesh Singh S/o Chandrika Singh, are Accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Sessions Trial No. 219 of 1983,...

Mahesh Yadav and anr. Vs. Rajeshwar Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 44; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9, Rule 13; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : AIR2009SC1064; 2009(2)AWC1361(SC); 2009(4)MhLJ324(SC); 2008(16)SCALE162; (2009)2SCC205:2008AIRSCW218:2009(1)LHSC224.

Advocate for Respondent : H.L. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. and ; Kailash Chand, Adv.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Plaintiff in a suit for declaration of title and possession is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 4.3.2004 passed the High Court of Judicature at...

Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Sunway Constru ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 2(1), 9, 11, 11(6), 11(12) and 17

Reported in : 2008(3)ARBLR28(SC); 2008(2)AWC1230(SC); 2008(4)CTC348; (2008)8MLJ73(SC); 2008(3)SCALE603; (2008)5SCC222; 2008AIRSCW2059; 2008(3)CivilLJ81

Advocate for Respondent : Sumeet Kachchwa, ; Ashok Sagar and ; Meenakshi Arora, Adv

ORDERLokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. This is an application under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and relates to a dispute under an agreement...

Arvind Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 32, 34, 120-B, 302, 304-B, 313 and 498(A & B); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 385

Reported in : AIR2001SC2124; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)917; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)95; 2001(49)BLJR1728; 2001CriLJ2556; 2001(2)Crimes242(SC); I(2001)DMC734SC; JT2001(5)SC127; 2001(3)SCALE549; (2001)6SCC407

Advocate for Respondent : H.L. Aggarwal, Sr. Adv., ; Kumar Rajesh Singh and ; B.B. Singh

Banerjee,J.1. The appeal in question tell the tale of a young girl dying out of burn injuries. Whereas the learned Sessions Judge convicted each of the accused being the husband, the father-in-law, the mother-in-law and the...

Krishna Mochi and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(4), 4 and 5 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 326, 341, 342, 436 and 452 ; Arms Act ; Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act - Sections 17 ; Constitution of India - Articles 6, 19 and 21 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235(2) and 354(3) ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 134

Reported in : AIR2002SC1965; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)761; (2002)3CALLT9(SC); 2002CriLJ2645; 2002(2)Crimes236(SC); JT2002(4)SC186; 2002(3)SCALE602; (2002)6SCC81; [2002]3SCR1

Shah, J.1. With respect I regret for my inability to agree with the judgment rendered by my learned brother Justice Agrawal. At the outset, it requires to be stated that this case illustrates how faulty, delayed,...

Director, Bcg Vaccine Laboratory, Madras Vs. S. Pandian and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1996(2)CTC52; (1996)IILLJ634SC; (1996)2MLJ63(SC); (1997)11SCC346

ORDERS.C. Agrawal, J.1. These appeals are directed against the Judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal) dated July 12, 1989. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the respondents and during...