Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: h c dubey · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.040 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 04 2006

Ghanshyam Yadav Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-04-2006

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR84]; (2006)IIILLJ732All

Advocate for Respondent : H.C. Dubey, Adv.

R.K. Agrawal and Sanjay Misra, JJ.1. We have heard Sri S.K. Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.C Dubey, learned Counsel for the respondents and perused the averments made in the writ petition, its...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2004

Dharmendra Kumar Shukla Vs. Telecom District Manager and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-18-2004

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1846

Advocate for Respondent : H.C. Dubey, Adv. and B.N. Singh, S.C.

Vineet Saran, J.1. The petitioner claims that he was appointed and posted as computer operator in the office of respondent No. 1 and continued to work as such upto 31.5.2001 but thereafter he has not been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2004

Lalloo Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-28-2004

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 33; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 21; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 22 and 129

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2752

Advocate for Respondent : H.C. Dubey, S.C. and ;B.N. Singh, S.S.C.

D.P. Singh, J.1. Pleadings are complete and the counsel for the parties agree that the petition may be finally disposed of under the Rules of the Court.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.3. This writ petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 15 1999

Satyapriya Sonkar Vs. Superintendent, Central Jail and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-15-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 286, 307, 332 and 353; Criminal Law Amendment Act - Sections 2(4), 3(5), 7, 8, 10, 11, 11(1), 12 and 14; National Security Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 3(2); Constitution of India - Articles 22(4), 22(5), 26 and 226

Reported in : 2000CriLJ1369

Advocate for Respondent : H.C. Dubey and ;S.N. Srivastava Advs. and ;A.G.A.

R.R.K. Trivedi, J.1. Petitioner, by means of this writ petition, has challenged his detention under order dated 4-6-1999, passed by respondent No. 2 District Magistrate, Allahabad under Section 3(2) of National Security Act, 1986 (here-in-after referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial