Advanced Search Results
Rameshchandra Jamnadas and Co. Vs. Terene Traders and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-01-1986
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
1986(3)BomCR406; (1986)88BOMLR427
H.A. Solkar, Adv. for ;Bharat Zaveri, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;P.A. Jani, Adv., i/b., Gagrat and Co. for respondent No. 2
V.V. Vaze, J.1. History's most grand lose accomplishments can have the most banal of origins. Sagacity and foresight of many a captains is industry combined to put Bombay on the map of India as its industrial...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Lalit S. Nagpal and Others
Mumbai
Dec-24-1998
Criminal
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 6-A, 6-E and 12-AC; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167, 397 and 452; Petrolling Products Distributation Order, 1972
1999(5)BomCR487; 1999(1)MhLj915
H.A. Solkar and ;R.A. Shaikh, Advs.
ORDERD. G. Deshpande, J.1. All these applications are filed by the State and they involve a common question of law. I have heard the learned A.P.P. for the State of Maharashtra and Mr. H.A. Solkar for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Suresh Dattatraya Varnekar
Mumbai
Nov-10-1980
Criminal
Customs Act - Sections 135; Gold Control Act, 1968 - Sections 85
1981CriLJ1717
1. This is an appeal by the State for enhancement of the sentence. The accused was charged under Section 135(b)(ii) of the Customs Act and Section 85(ii), (iii) and (ix) of the Gold Control Act, 1968....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Babu Hamidkhan Mestry Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-04-1994
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 142, 147 and 149; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161
1995(1)BomCR339; (1994)96BOMLR312; 1995CriLJ2356; 1995(1)MhLj843
Mrs. K.D. Randive, Addl. Public Prosecutor
1. The appellant aggrieved by the order dated 27-2-1986, passed by the Special Judge (Riots) Thane in Special Criminal Criminal Case No. 51 of 1984, convicting him under Sections 147, read with Sections 149 I.P.C., 148...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRetd. Lt. Col. Bhimrao Raghunath Karandikar Vs. Advocate Madhukar Yesh ...
Mumbai
Aug-19-1983
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 193, 200, 201 and 219; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 18
1983(2)BomCR558
A.M. Joshi, Adv. for Respondent No. 1, ;P.P. Hudilikar, P.P., for respondent No. 2-State of Maharashtra, ;Rustam M. Bhagalia, Adv. respondent No. 3-in-person, ;V.V. Kamat and ;S.S. Deshmukh, Advs. for
H.H. Kantharia, J.1. The petitioner, retired Lt. Col. Bhimrao Raghunath Karandikar, a resident of Pune, filed the present petition under section 482, of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Chandrakant Tripathi and Others
Mumbai
Sep-09-1983
Criminal
Contempt of Courts Act - Sections 2
(1983)85BOMLR562
Gadgil, J.1. This is a suo motu proceeding initiated by the Court against the three respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act. Respondent No. 1-Chandrakant Tripathi - is a Minister of State for Urban Development of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Chandrakant Tripathi and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-09-1983
Criminal
1983CriLJ1841
B.C. Gadgil, J. 1. This is a suo motu proceeding initiated by the Court against the three respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act. Respondent No. 1 Chandrakant. Tripathi is a Minister of State for Urban...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSahebrao Shankarrao Mistry Vs. Smt. Azizabai HusseIn Ahmed Mulla Since ...
Mumbai
Aug-24-1993
Tenancy
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 31
1994(1)BomCR513
H.A. Solkar, Adv.
M.F. Saldanha, J.1. The petitioner in this case was the original tenant in respect of an open piece of land admeasuring 45' x 36' x 60', situated at Old Agra Road, Thane. He had by a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPandharinath Sakharam Chavan Vs. Bhagwan Ramu Kate and ors.
Mumbai
Feb-13-1979
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 29, 29(1), 29(2), 32, 32(1), 32(1A), 32(1B), 32(1D), 32-A, 32-B, 32-C, 32-D, 32-E, 32-F, 32-G, 32-H, 32-I, 32-J, 32-K, 32-L, 32-M, 32-N, 32-O, 32-P, 32-Q, 32-R and 40; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 27; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 28; North-Western Provinces Rent Act, 1881 - Sections 95 and 96
AIR1980Bom203; (1980)82BOMLR341; 1979MhLJ337
D.M. Rane,;N.D. Bhatkal and;M.H. Solkar, Advs. for;H.A. Solkar, Adv.
Naik, J.1. This writ petition raises an interesting question as to whether the heirs of a deceased tenant are entitled to the benefit of Sub-section (1B) of Section 32 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaswantlal Chhotalal Doshi Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Apr-18-1991
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9 and 27
1991(3)BomCR647
H.A. Solkar, A.P.P.
S.S. Dani, J.1. The appellant-accused Jaswantlal Chotalal Doshi, challenges the order of conviction and sentence dated 26th October 1989 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, is Sessions No. 502 of 1988, holding the appellant-accused guilty...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »