Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: gupta · Page 1 of about 76,173 results (1.132 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 21 2004

Rakesh Kumar Sharma and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-21-2004

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 243; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 11; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 4(42B) and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 7, 8, 11 and 12

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2234

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Gupta, Adv. and ;Sudhir Agarwal, A.A.G. S.C.

Tarun Chatterjee, C.J.1. In these bunch of writ petitions, the notifications issued by the State Government on 13th January, 2004 in the exercise of power under Section 11 of the U. P. Land Revenue Act, 1901...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1998

Smt. Sheela Sabharwal and Others Vs. Iind Additional District Judge, A ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-30-1998

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1); Uttar Pradesh Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 16(1)

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1946

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;Vishnu Gupta, Adv.

J.C. Gupta, J.1. Heard Sri Prakash Krishna, petitioner's counsel. Sri Vishnu Gupta and Sri K. M. Dayal, Senior Advocate appear for the caveator respondent Nos. 3 to 5 (landlords).2. This is tenant's writ petition. The dispute...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2026

Rama CIVIL India Construction Private Ltd Through Authorized Represent ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Arbitration

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 24.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026+ ARB.P. 1787/2025, I.A. 30458/2025 (U/O 1 Rule 10), I.A. O.A. 42/2026 (Seeking setting aside of the order dt....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 24 2005

National thermal Power Corporation Ltd. (Ntpc) Vs. Siemens Atiengesell ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-24-2005

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Sections 2, 2(1), 5, 8, 9, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 16(3), 17, 33, 34, 34(1), 34(2), 37, 37(1), 37(2), 37(3), 39 and 39(2); Limitation Act, 1963; Indian Cricket Council Rules - Schedule - Articles 18, 18(1) and 19; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 2, Rule 2; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39

Reported in : 2005(2)ARBLR172(Delhi); 121(2005)DLT36; 2005(83)DRJ46

Advocate for Respondent : Deepankar Gupta, Sr. Adv., ; Naveen Kumar and ; Tamanna Mal

R. C. Jain, J.1. This appeal under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section 151 CPC is directed against the Partial Award dated 31st July,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2006

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Brijendra Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-22-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Municipal (Subordinate and Ministerial Service) Rules, 1963 - Rules 8, 10, 12, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22 and 27

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR388]; RLW2006(2)Raj1621; 2006(3)WLC345

Advocate for Respondent : M.C. Jain and; M.S. Gupta, Advs.

R.S. Chauhan, J.1. The State of Rajasthan has challenged the judgment dated 13.8.1996, whereby the learned Single Judge has directed the State to give emergent temporary appointment to the Respondent on the post of Revenue Inspector...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2008

Marshal Paper and Board Mill Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-02-2008

Subject : InsuranceConstitution

Reported in : (2009)IILLJ448MP; 2008(5)MPHT155

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India though the petitioner has prayed for many a relief, the fundamental and seminal relief from which the other...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2006

G. Subrahmanyam Vs. Executive Officer and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-03-2006

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD557

Advocate for Respondent : P. Harinath Gupta, SC for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner was engaged as an NMR worker in the S.G.S Arts College Hostel, Tirupati, which is part of the Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams (for short 'Devasthanams'), with effect from 1-7-1976. Thereafter, he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 1978

Renusagar Power Company Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, 'A' Ward and Anr. ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-19-1978

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147 and 148

Reported in : [1979]117ITR719(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Gupta, Adv.

K.C. Agrawal, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing the notice dated March 12, 1976, issued under Section 148 of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 1997

Vijay Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-22-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35B and 35B(1); Finance Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1978; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1980

Reported in : (1997)142CTR(P& H)510; [1998]232ITR179(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : B.S. Gupta, Senior Adv. and; Sanjay Bansal, Adv.

N.K. Agrawal, J. 1. The following identical question of law has been referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, 'the Tribunal'), in all the three references (Income-tax Reference No. 139 of 1982 and Nos. 67...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2004

Gulab Singh Vs. the Maharishi Dayanand University and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-27-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharishi Dayanand University Act - Sections 9(14)

Reported in : (2005)139PLR440

Advocate for Respondent : Balram Gupta, Sr. Adv. and; Shreesh Gupta, Adv.

S.S. Nijjar, J.1. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal at the motion stage.2. In this writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial