Advanced Search Results

Union of India Vs. Telecom Regulatory

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4(1) and 8; Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 2(J), 11(1), 12 and 15(5); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 2(23)

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)209; 74(1998)DLT282; 1998(46)DRJ557

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Authority of India, ; Mr. Gopal Subramaniam and Ors. ;

ORDERUsha Mehra, J. 1. Two vital questions have been raised in these appeals; one pertaining to the powers of the Government to grant or revoke license vis-a-vis the extent and ambit of the powers and functions...

S. Nagender Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 2(7), 3A, 10, 139(4) and 142; Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982; Advocates Act; Durgah Khwaja Saheb Act, 1955 - Sections 5 and 9; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Government of India Act, 1915; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1935 - Sections 298; Constitution of India - Articles 6(4), 12, 14, 15, 15(4), 16, 16(1), 16(4), 32, 38(2), 46, 58(2), 60, 66(4), 102(1), 148, 149, 162, 166(1), 166(2), 226, 298, 309, 310, 311, 311(2), 335 and 338; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 24 and 196; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 4, 4(3), 7, 12, 13, 14 and 22; Andhra Pradesh Law Officers (Recruitment, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1967; Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 49; Andhra Pradesh Law Officer

Reported in : 2006(4)ALD210; 2006(4)ARBLR75(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : Government Pleader for Services-II for Respondent No. 1, ;C.V. Rudra Prasad, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 30 and ;V. Rajamanohar, Adv. for Respondent No. 31

P.S. Narayana, J.1. The profession of law is called a noble profession. It does not remain noble merely by calling it as such unless there is a continued, corresponding and expected performance of this noble profession...

Tikam Singh Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal code - Sections 193, 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24(8); Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 2, 3(2), 4, 4(2), 14, 15, 20, 21, 23, 24, 24(1), 24(2), 24(3), 24(6), 24(7), 28(8) and 225; Advocates Act; Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 - Rule 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(3) and 4(5)

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj2636; 2006(4)WLC46

Advocate for Respondent : H.R. Soni, Additional Government Adv. and; Mahesh Bora, Adv.

Dinesh Maheshwari, J.1. The petitioner accused, facing trial for offences under Sections 302, 201 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 ('the Act of 1989'/'the Act' hereafter)...

Karimaben K. Bagad Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 11; Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3321; (2004)3GLR670

Advocate for Respondent : A.D. Oza, Government Pleader for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2,; Manisha Lavkumar, Addl. Standing Counsel for re

D.P. Buch, J.1. The petitioner above named, has preferred thispetition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiafor appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing andsetting aside an order passed by respondent no.4 hereinunder section 7...

Raghunandhan Reddy Vs. State of Hyderabad Through Secy. of Government, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7; Hyderabad Abkari Act, 1316F - Sections 2, 3(1), 41 and 41(2)

Reported in : AIR1963AP110

Advocate for Respondent : V. Madhava Reddy, Adv. for ;N.S. Raghavan, Principal Government Pleader

Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. In this appeal, the appellant seeks to challenge the Judgment and decree of the lower Court dismissing the suit filed by him for a perpetual injunction against the Government and for the return...

Seshachala Chetty and ors. Vs. Para Chinnasami and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1917)32MLJ1

John Wallis, C.J.1. The question referred to us is, whether in a mirasi village the mirasidar is entitled to recover possession of a house site held under a patta from Government; and, to show what it...

Nijaguni Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 229

Reported in : ILR2005KAR2638; 2005(1)KarLJ248

Advocate for Respondent : B.P. Puttasiddaiah, High Court Government Pleader for Respondent-1 in W.P. Nos. 29955 to 29958 of 2003 and for Respondents-1 and 2 in W.P. Nos. 28702 of 2003 and 10279 of 2004 and for Respondents in W

ORDERK. Bhakthavatsala, J.1. Two Government Orders one dated 7-6-2003 bearing No. FD.8.SRP.2003 and the second dated 29-1-2004 bearing No. FD 24 SRP 2003, insofar as adjusting the grant of enhanced Dearness Allowance at the rate of...

Self Financing Private Teacher Training Institutes Association (Regd.) ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Educational Institutions and of Appointments or posts in the Services) under the State Act, 1993; National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 12, 14, 14(2), 14(3), 14(4), 14(6), 15, 16, 17, 20, 20(6), 31(1) and 32; University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 2 and 3; All India Council for Teacher Education Act; Medical Council Act; Tamil Nadu Private Schools Regulation Act, 1976; Tamil Nadu Private Colleges Regulation Act; Workmen Compensation Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 162; National Council for Teacher Education Rules, 1997; National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 7, 7(1), 7(11), 7(12), 8, 8(5) and 8(10); National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition,

Reported in : (2009)2MLJ787

Advocate for Respondent : N. Kannadasan, Additional Adv. General III assisted by ;G. Sankaran, Spl. Govt. Pleader and ;Dhakshayani Reddy, Government Adv., ;K. Ramakrishna Reddy and ;P.R. Gopinathan, Advs.

ORDERP. Jyothimani, J.1. In these batch of writ petitions the Self Financing Private Teacher Training Institutes have challenged the validity of the impugned Government Order in G.O.Ms. No. 108 School Education (U1) Department dated 17.05.2007 and...

Shri Jos Peter Dsouza Vs. Mr. Vilas P. Thali,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2003Bom231; 2003(4)BomCR228

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Kakodkar, Sr. Adv., ;J.J. De Souza, Adv. for respondent No. 1, ;A.N.S. Nadkarni, Adv. General and ;H.D. Naik, Additional Government Adv. for the Respondent No. 2

P.V. Kakade, J.1. This Petition has been filed in publicinterest by the Petitioner who is a practicing Advocatein Goa. The first Respondent is an Additional AdvocateGeneral practicing in Goa and who came to be appointedon 23rd...

Km. Meenakshi Agrawal and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 140, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 326, 423, 452, 504 and 506; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 41, 41(1), 170, 173(2) and 482; General Clauses Act - Sections 4(42B) and 21

Reported in : 2001CriLJ395

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A., S.D. Kautilya, Samit Gopal and G.S. Chaturvedi, Advs.

U.S. Tripathi, J.1. Common questions of law and facts are involved in above writ petitions and therefore, all the above writ petitions are taken up together for disposal for which the learned counsel for the parties...