Advanced Search Results

O.A. Joseph and Etc. Vs. Chairman, Board of Governors Sainik Schools S ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 41, 45, 46 and 226

Reported in : AIR2001Ker7

Advocate for Respondent : K. Ramakumar, S.C.G.S.C.

ORDERC.S. Rajan, J.1. Petitioner in O.P. No. 21271/ 99 is a parent of a Cadet in Sainik school, Kazhakoottam studying in the XIIth standard of the CBSC course. The petitioners in O.P.No. 21288/99 are the President...

Sivarama Pillai and ors. Vs. Marichami Pillai

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1970)1MLJ376

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. T. P. Gopalakrishnan

K.S. Ramamurthi, J.1. This second appeal arises out of a dispute between owners of adjacent lands who also had joint rights in a well. The family of the plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 (hereinafter referred...

Dr.R.Devashankar Vs. the Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.K.Venkatramani, Adv

JUDGMENT(Delivered by P.JYOTHIMANI,J.)1. The fourth respondent in the writ petition has filed the present appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 6.4.2010, by which the learned Judge has set aside the impugned government...

R. Balakrishna Pillai Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24, 24(8), 225 and 239

Reported in : 1999CriLJ1286

Advocate for Respondent : P. Gopalakrishnan Nair, Adv. and; P.K. Ravikrishnan, G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and;

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Heard Mr. T. V. Prabhakaran and Mr. T. Ravikumar for the appellant; Mr. P. Gopalakrishnan Nair for the first respondent and Mr. Antony Dominic for the third respondent.2. This Writ Appeal is directed...

Manobi vs Kerala State

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 22ND POUSHA, 1945 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT 24.11.2015 IN CRA 513/2014 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT &...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Lilly Vasudevan

Court : Kerala

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2005(3)KLT1068

Advocate for Respondent : C.S. Gopalakrishnan Nair and; Chandini G. Nair, Advs.

M. Ramachandran, J.1. An order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No. 906 of 2003 dated 12-2-2004 is under challenge. On the basis of Annexure A-1 envisaged for grant of benefits under the scheme for...

S. Ganapathy and ors. Vs. V. Pandiramaiah and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Rules, 1976; Constitution of India - Article 226; Service Regulations, 1989

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ552

Advocate for Respondent : Ramapriya Gopalakrishnan, Adv. for Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 and ;V. Selvanayagam, Adv. for Respondents Nos. 4 and 5

Prabha Sridevan, J.1. The appellants herein have been fighting a long battle at least from 1984, when they first came to this Court with a writ petition. The appellants and the contesting respondents are employees of...

Pappu Reddiar Vs. P.S.V. Rm. Ramanatha Iyer

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 144

Reported in : AIR1963Mad45

Advocate for Respondent : T.P. Gopalakrishnan, Adv.

Ramachandra Iyer, C.J.1. This appeal arises from the judgment of Ganapatia Pillai, J. and involves the determination of a question relating to award of interest while directing restitution. Muthuswami Reddiar, since deceased, whose estate is now...

B. Krishna Murthy Rao and Another Vs. C.S. Sakunthalamma and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Articles 54; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD264; 1998(6)ALT635

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.S. Gopalakrishnan, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioners herein were the owners of an old construction, portion of which was leased out to the defendants. The plaintiffs-petitioners herein felt it necessary to demolish the structures and construct a new building. The...

E. Sekar Vs. Sampath Rajkumar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings [Lease and Rent Control] Act, 1960 - Sections 8, 8(2), 8(5), 9 and 25

Reported in : (2007)0MLJ0; 2007(34)PTC0(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : K.P. Gopalakrishnan, Adv.

ORDERR. Banumathi, J.1. Aggrieved by the concurrent findings of Rent Control Authorities ordering eviction on the ground of wilful default, the Tenant has preferred this revision.2. Relevant facts in nutshell for disposal of this revision are...