Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: gopal narain · Page 1 of about 171 results (0.125 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 03 1990

Shakti Fabrics Vs. Sri Ram Textiles

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-03-1990

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 37, Rule 3;

Reported in : 1991(1)ARBLR73(Delhi); 42(1990)DLT671; 1991(20)DRJ190; 1990RLR493

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Gopal Narain

M.L. Verma, J. (1) This is a petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the CPC) against the order of the Commercial Sub-Judge, Delhi dated 28-10-89 allowing the application...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1995

Mahli Devi Vs. Chander Bhan and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-1995

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 54; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2 and 110; Government of India Act - Sections 107 and 108; Land Acquisition Act, 1921 - Sections 26; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39; Trade Marks Act - Sections 76

Reported in : 1995IAD(Delhi)1434; AIR1995Delhi293; 58(1995)DLT162; 1995(33)DRJ121

Advocate for Respondent : P.L. Kalra, Adv.

ORDERArun Kumar, J. 1. The question for consideration by the Full Bench is whether aLetters Patent appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent applicable to this court is maintainable in view of the provisions of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1969

Chiranji Lal Vs. Bhiko

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-06-1969

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 144

Reported in : 5(1969)DLT430; ILR1969Delhi296

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Gopal Narain

Hardayal Hardy, J.(1) This is a puzzling little case in which I must confess my mind has fluctuated some-what and thereforee although counsel's arguments were heard by me as far back as January 16, 1969, I...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 26 1999

U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Vs. Labour Court, Gorakhpur and Anot ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-26-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 4K and 6F; Constitution of India - Article 226; Minimum Wages Act

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2700

Advocate for Respondent : Shyam Narain and ;Gopal Narain, S.C.

K. Jain, J.1. Respondent No. 2 espousing the cause of ten workmen, namely, Rani Adhar Dixit, Sequan Dixit. Chandra Shekhar Dixit. Vijay Shankar Dixit. Ram Nakshatra Dixit, Salaraat, Indal Yadav, Mohan Dixit and Ram Dhari Yadav....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2000

Chanderwati Devi Vs. Harish Chand Rastogi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-06-2000

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 16 and 146

Reported in : 86(2000)DLT636; 2000(54)DRJ820

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Gopal Narain Aggarwal, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Mahajan, J.1. On 14th July, 1977 a decree for Rs. 69,577.61 paise with proportionate costs was passed in favor of the decree holder and against all the judgment debtors. The decree holder was also granted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2009

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Assistant Commissioner Income Tax and ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Feb-12-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2009]179TAXMAN27(NULL)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Gopal Narain

Prafulla C. Pant, J. 1. This appeal, preferred under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961, is directed against the order dated 19.10.2006, passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, 'D' Delhi, passed in ITA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2008

Uttaranchal Power Corporation Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Workmen's Compensation ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Feb-12-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2008(117)FLR560]; (2008)IIILLJ183UC

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Gopal Narain

Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri N.S. Negi, counsel for the appellant and Sri Mohinder Singh Bisht holding the brief of Sri Gopal Narain, counsel for the respondent.2. Present appeal has been filed against the judgment and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2000

Executive Engineer, Garhwal Jal Sansthan and anr. Vs. Chhotey Singh an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-04-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act

Reported in : [2000(85)FLR909]; (2000)IIILLJ826All

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Gopal Narain

Aloke Chakrabarti, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Gopal Narain learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 workman. 2. Main contention raised on behalf of the petitioners is that being a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1999

Lahboli Kisan Sewa Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Vs. P.O., Labour Court and ors ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-02-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17B; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 1(3) and 135

Reported in : [1999(82)FLR453]; (2001)IIILLJ465All

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Gopal Narain

O.P. Garg, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, it is prayed that the award dated July 31, 1998, Annexure 1 to the writ petition, published on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2005

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation thro' Regional Manager Vs. State ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Jul-13-2005

Subject : CivilLabour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17B; Uttar Pradesh Re-organization Act, 2000 - Sections 35; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2005(106)FLR1142]; (2005)IIILLJ9UC

Advocate for Respondent : Gopal Narain, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

Prafulla C. Pant, J.1. By means of this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned award dated November 28, 1997...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial