Advanced Search Results
Jindal Stainless Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-2007
Commercial
Constitution of India - Article 12
2007(1)CTLJ395(Del)
Gitanjali Mohan, Adv. for R-1 and 2 and ; Sidharth Yadav and ;
Mukul Mudgal, J.1. This writ petition challenges the decision of Respondent No. 2, Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) to award the tender for Stainless Steel Plates of grade IRSM-44097 to Respondent No. 3, Salem Steel since...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUmashanker Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Supreme Court of India
Oct-05-2001
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 489-A, 489-B, 489-C and 489-E; Evidence Act - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313
AIR2001SC3074; 2001(2)ALD(Cri)717; 2001ALLMR(Cri)2398(SC); 2001CriLJ4696; JT2001(8)SC322; 2001(7)SCALE37; (2001)9SCC642; 2001(2)LC1556(SC)
Ms. Gitanjali Mohan, Adv. for Prakash Shrivastava
ORDER1. Leave is granted.2. The convict, in Session Trial No. 26 of 1991 on the file of the learned Sixth Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur, under Sections 489B and 489C of the Indian Penal Code (for short,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Shahnaz HussaIn Wife of Late Shri Nasir Hussian Vs. State of U.P. ...
Allahabad
Aug-20-2007
ExciseCriminal
2008(227)ELT61(All)
Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.1. A mother and son have challenged by the abovenoted two applications under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code, the mail taxability of complaint filed by Deputy Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Noida...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shahnaz Ayurvedics Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Allahabad
Jan-29-2004
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 35C and 37B; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226
2004(173)ELT337(All)
B.N. Singh, CGSC and ;S.K. Misra, Adv.
B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 14-5-2003 (Annex. 10) passed by the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, hereinafter called the 'CEGAT', by which the Tribunal has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMisrilal Dharamchand (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Delhi
Jan-18-1994
Civil
Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Rule 55
53(1994)DLT364; 1994(28)DRJ317
Anil Dev Singh, J.(1) The facts leading to this petition are as under:- the petitioner, which is a Private Limited Company, filed an application on June 13, 1959 for the grant of a prospecting license for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHbhl-vks (J.V.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Apr-27-2006
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 11, 11(2), 11(4), 11(5) and 11(6); Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 141
2006(2)ARBLR331(Delhi); 2006(90)DRJ181
Gitanjali Mohan and ;Aeltemesh Rein Advs.
Swatanter Kumar, J. 1. This order will dispose of the above three cases as common question of law falls for consideration in all these cases based on somewhat similar facts. For the purposes of convenience, it...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Surtax Vs. Goetze (India) Ltd.
Delhi
Jul-18-2000
Direct Taxation
Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 - Sections 2(5) and 2(8); Companies (Profits) Surtax Rules - Rule 4; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80I and 80J
[2000]246ITR602(Delhi)
Gitanjali Mohan, Adv.
Arijit Pasayat, C.J. 1. Since these three references involve identical questions, our order will govern each one of them.2. On the basis of the applications filed by the Revenue under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›