Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: gitanjali mohan · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.025 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 17 2007

Jindal Stainless Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2007

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 12

Reported in : 2007(1)CTLJ395(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Gitanjali Mohan, Adv. for R-1 and 2 and ; Sidharth Yadav and ;

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. This writ petition challenges the decision of Respondent No. 2, Ministry of Railways (Railway Board) to award the tender for Stainless Steel Plates of grade IRSM-44097 to Respondent No. 3, Salem Steel since...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2001

Umashanker Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-05-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 489-A, 489-B, 489-C and 489-E; Evidence Act - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : AIR2001SC3074; 2001(2)ALD(Cri)717; 2001ALLMR(Cri)2398(SC); 2001CriLJ4696; JT2001(8)SC322; 2001(7)SCALE37; (2001)9SCC642; 2001(2)LC1556(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Gitanjali Mohan, Adv. for Prakash Shrivastava

ORDER1. Leave is granted.2. The convict, in Session Trial No. 26 of 1991 on the file of the learned Sixth Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur, under Sections 489B and 489C of the Indian Penal Code (for short,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2007

Smt. Shahnaz HussaIn Wife of Late Shri Nasir Hussian Vs. State of U.P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-20-2007

Subject : ExciseCriminal

Reported in : 2008(227)ELT61(All)

Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.1. A mother and son have challenged by the abovenoted two applications under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code, the mail taxability of complaint filed by Deputy Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Noida...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 29 2004

Shahnaz Ayurvedics Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-29-2004

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 35C and 37B; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 2004(173)ELT337(All)

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Singh, CGSC and ;S.K. Misra, Adv.

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 14-5-2003 (Annex. 10) passed by the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, hereinafter called the 'CEGAT', by which the Tribunal has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1994

Misrilal Dharamchand (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-18-1994

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Rule 55

Reported in : 53(1994)DLT364; 1994(28)DRJ317

Anil Dev Singh, J.(1) The facts leading to this petition are as under:- the petitioner, which is a Private Limited Company, filed an application on June 13, 1959 for the grant of a prospecting license for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2006

Hbhl-vks (J.V.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-27-2006

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 11, 11(2), 11(4), 11(5) and 11(6); Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 141

Reported in : 2006(2)ARBLR331(Delhi); 2006(90)DRJ181

Advocate for Respondent : Gitanjali Mohan and ;Aeltemesh Rein Advs.

Swatanter Kumar, J. 1. This order will dispose of the above three cases as common question of law falls for consideration in all these cases based on somewhat similar facts. For the purposes of convenience, it...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2000

Commissioner of Surtax Vs. Goetze (India) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-18-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 - Sections 2(5) and 2(8); Companies (Profits) Surtax Rules - Rule 4; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80I and 80J

Reported in : [2000]246ITR602(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Gitanjali Mohan, Adv.

Arijit Pasayat, C.J. 1. Since these three references involve identical questions, our order will govern each one of them.2. On the basis of the applications filed by the Revenue under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial