Advanced Search Results

Rotarian Sidheshwar Dayal and ors. Vs. Rotarian U.N. Maira and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 6, 11 and 11(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15 and 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : 2007(1)ARBLR298(Delhi); 2007(94)DRJ155

Advocate for Respondent : Girdhar Govind and ; Noorun Nahar Firdausi, Advs.

Vipin Sanghi, J.1. Petitioners are members of the Rotary Club of Delhi, Rotary District 3010, comprising of Rotary Clubs in Delhi, parts of U.P and Haryana. Respondent No. 1 Shri U.N. Maira was, at the time...

Jai Prakash Vs. Wimpy Fast Food P. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act

Advocate for Respondent : Girdhar Govind,; Noorun Nahar Firdausi and; Mamta Tandon

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.The Counsels have been heard. The facts which emerge are as under:1. Mr. Jai Prakash petitioner in WP(C) 6340/2002 raised an industrial dispute against 'the Management of M/s. Wimpy Fast Food Pvt. Ltd.,...

Goverdhan Lal Soni Vs. Indian Sulphacid Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 111(2004)DLT4b; 2004(74)DRJ287

Advocate for Respondent : Gaurav Kejriwal, Adv.

R.C. Jain, J.1. Through this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Goverdhan Lal Soni (hereinafter to be referred to as the alleged `sub-tenant') seeks to challenge the order of the learned...

B. Banerjee Vs. Romesh Mahajan

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 63(1996)DLT930; 1996(39)DRJ87; 1996RLR499

Usha Mehra, J. (1) The petition for eviction was filed by Mr.Romesh Mahajan against the present petitioner from the premises bearing No.8-A/99, Western Extension Area, Karol Bagh, New Delhi under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25-B...

Union Of India Vs. Bharat Forge Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.___________ OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C) No.4960 of 2021) UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS …APPELLANT (S) VERSUS BHARAT FORGE LTD. & ANOTHER …RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT K.M....

M/S. Taneja Developers and Infrastructure Ltd. and Vs. the Official Li ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : M/s. Delhi Automobiles Ltd. Learned, Mr. Sethi, Mr. Mahajan, Mr. Sibal

$~1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. 07.2013 Decided on:22. 08.2013 + CO.APPL.26/2011, C.M. NO. 7989/2011 (for stay) M/S. TANEJA DEVELOPERS AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. AND ANR. ..... Appellants...

Rahul Singh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, Mr. Girdhar Govind, Mr. Baljinder Singh

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 09.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2336/2019 RAHUL SINGH STATE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sugam Kumar Jha, Ms. Tanu Priya Gupta and Ms. Shailja...

Tripti Jha Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:10. h July, 2015 + W.P.(C) No.6073/2015 & CM No.11032/2015 (for interim relief) TRIPTI JHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. with...

Shivin Chaudhary Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:10. h July, 2015 + W.P.(C) No.6073/2015 & CM No.11032/2015 (for interim relief) TRIPTI JHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. with...

Mehta Entertainment Inc. Vs. Yashi Multimedia Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Girdhar Govind

MANMOHAN, J. 1. Present winding up petition has been filed under Section 433(e) read with Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) stating that the respondent is unable...