Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ghosh · Page 1 of about 11,599 results (0.492 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 18 1996

Ghantesher Ghosh Vs. Madan Mohan Ghosh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-18-1996

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Partition Act, 1893 - Sections 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 47 - Order 21, Rule 16 - Order 22, Rules 10 and 12; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 44 and 52

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)217; AIR1997SC471; (1997)1CALLT26(SC); JT1996(8)SC410; 1996(6)SCALE734; (1996)11SCC446; [1996]Supp6SCR448

Advocate for Respondent : Haradhan Banerjee, ; Bijan Ghosh and ; R.P. Gupta, Adv

S.B. Majmudar, J.1. A short question falls for determination of this Court in this appeal by special leave against the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta in Civil Revision Application No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2003

Pradeep Dutta Bhowmik and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Dec-04-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 156(3), 169, 170 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 380, 447 and 467

Advocate for Respondent : A. Ghosh, Public Prosecutor and S. Chakraborty, Adv.

T. Vaiphei, J. 1. This is an application under Section 482 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and/or under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2002

Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Through Its Commissioner Vs. Shri Raji ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-25-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 101(2002)DLT481; 2003(66)DRJ115; [2003(97)FLR129]

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Ghosh, Adv.

Vijender Jain, J.1. Rule.2. This petition can be disposed of as the ground taken by the petitioner/Municipal Corporation of Delhi is that award being without jurisdiction being void ab initio as the dispute inter se the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 30 1996

Mohta Alloy and Steel Works Vs. Mohta Finance and Leasing Co. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-30-1996

Subject : ArbitrationCompany

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 46

Reported in : [1997]89CompCas227(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Dr. Shankar, ; Ghosh, ; Ms. Mukti Choudhary and ;

Dr. M.K. Sharma, J. 1. This is a petition under section 33 of the Arbitration Act filed by the petitioner challenging the existence and validity of the arbitration clause forming part of the lease agreements entered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1992

Ajai Kumar Tomar Vs. Raj NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-02-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 202, 203, 244, 249, 320(2) and 482

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2547

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A. and ;Tapan Ghosh, Adv.

ORDERJ.P. Semwal, J.1. By the present application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. the applicant has prayed for quashing the complaint bearing No. 1771 of 1982, Raj Narain and R.K. Nayyar v. Ajai Kumar Qumar, under Section 420/406,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2026

Rabi Ghosh vs New Delhi Municipal Council

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-11-2026

Subject : Education

$~39 and 40* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 11th March, 2026 + CM(M) 152/2021 & CM APPL. 61443/2025 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Standing Counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2005

Tapan Das and ors. Vs. State of Tripura

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-11-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 354, 376 and 376(1)

Advocate for Respondent : A. Ghosh, Adv.

A.B. Pal, J.1. Four appellants having been convicted under section 376(1) IPC and three of them also under section 354 IPC on the charge of committing rape and outraging modesty in Sessions Trial No. 147(WT/ A)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 1952

Aswini Kumar Ghosh and anr. Vs. Arabinda Bose and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-27-1952

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 4(2), 5(1), 8(1), 9(4), 14 and 14(3); Supreme Court Advocates (Practice in High Courts) Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules; Bombay High Court Original Side Rules; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 119 - Order I, Rule 2 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order IV, Rule 11 - Order IV, Rule 12 - Order IV, Rule 30 - Order IV, Rule 31

Reported in : AIR1952SC369; [1953]4SCR1

Patanjali Sastri, C.J.1. This is an application under article 32 of the Constitution for relief in respect of an alleged infringement of the fundamental right of the petitioners under article 19(1)(g) or, alternatively, under article 136...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 1988

Rakesh Kumar and anr Vs. Hindustan Everest Tool Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-07-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106

Reported in : AIR1988SC976; JT1988(1)SC619; 1988(1)SCALE556; (1988)2SCC165; [1988]3SCR88; 1988(1)LC613(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Shankar Ghosh, ; Rajiv Endlow, ; Sandeep Narain and ;

Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. Special leave granted in both the matters and the appeals are disposed of hereunder.2. The facts in both these cases are identical. These appeals are directed against the judgment and orders of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1994

Papnasam Labour Union Vs. Madura Coats Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-08-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 19, 19(2) and 19(6); Industrial Dispute (Amendment) Act, 1976; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25M, 25M(2), 25N and 25O

Reported in : AIR1995SC2200; (1995)97BOMLR319; [1995(70)FLR319]; JT1995(1)SC71; 1995LabIC735; 1994(5)SCALE153; (1995)1SCC501; [1994]Supp6SCR369; (1995)1UPLBEC479

Advocate for Respondent : Shankar Ghosh, Sr. Adv., ; R.P. Dava, ; R.A. Perumal and ;

G. N. Ray, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 9th Apri), 1981 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madras in Writ Petition No.) 119 of i 977. The said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial