Advanced Search Results

Pralhad Krishna Kurane Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 4, 7, 7(1) and 11; Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1951 - Sections 1(3), 2, 3(3), 6, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 10(1), 12 and 12(1); Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(1) and 226; Bombay Public Security Measures Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(4), and 21; Bengal Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1930; West Bengal Security Ordinance, 1949; West Bengal Security Ordinance, 1940; West Bengal Security Ordinance, 1942; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 491

Reported in : AIR1952Bom1; (1951)53BOMLR717; ILR1952Bom134

Advocate for Respondent : H.M. Choksi, Govt. Pleader

Baydekar, J. [1] This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a person, who was originally detained under an order dated 1-4-1948 under the Bombay Public Security Measures Act. It appears...

Smt. Kamla Devi Mantri Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 155 and 155(3)

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas188(MP); 1990(0)MPLJ61

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Waghmare and ;S.L. Jain, Advs.

A.G. Qureshi, J. 1. Smt. Kamla Devi Mantri, residing at 6/3 Queens Park, Calcutta, has filed this petition under Section 155, read with Section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956, against Grasim Industries Ltd., Birlagram, Nagda...

Gopal Krishna Sharma Vs. Engineer-in-chief, P.W.D. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [1999(81)FLR605]; (1999)IIILLJ706MP; 1999(2)MPLJ164

Advocate for Respondent : Ghitale, G.A.

B.A. Khan, J.1. Petitioner is asking for moon and wants to return to service after having resigned from his post about 12 years back.2. Petitioner was appointed Overseer (Civil) way back on December 18, 1966 by...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. B.G. Chitale

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)11STJ63CESTAT(Mum.)bai

1. This appeal is directed against order-in-appeal dt. 17.7.2006. Vide which the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the order-in-original which rejected the refund claim filed by the respondents.2. Considered the submissions made in detail by both...

Union of India and anr. Vs. B.D. Rathi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(2), 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 13(2), 14, 22, 22A, 25 and 26(2A); Minimum Wages (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rules 24(4A), 25 and 32; Railway Servants (Hours of Employment) Rules, 1951 - Rule 5; Indian Railways Act - Sections 71E; Constitution of India - Article 227; Factories Act - Sections 51

Reported in : AIR1963Bom54; (1962)64BOMLR676; [1962(5)FLR435]; ILR1962Bom830

Advocate for Respondent : P.R. Namjoshi, Adv.

Ghitale, J.1. These are applications against the decision by he Authority under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, at Bombay (hereinafter referred to as the Authority), on applications submitted by several employees of he Central Railway. The...