Advanced Search Results

Kalooram and anr. Vs. Mangilal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104

Reported in : AIR1984MP147

Advocate for Respondent : S.L. Garg, Adv.

G.G. Sohani, J. 1. This is defendants' second appeal arising out of a suit for possession of a portion of -suit house situated at Neem Chowk, Ratlam. The plaintiffs case, in brief, was that Jeetmal, father...

Smt. Bimla Devi Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 323 and 325

Reported in : AIR2003SC4138; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)99; 2003CriLJ2319; [2003(3)JCR9(SC)]; JT2003(4)SC1; 2003(3)SCALE743; (2003)10SCC118

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Garg, ; Vivek Sharma and ; Kavita Wadia, Advs.

Santosh Hedge, J.1. The appellant herein, alongwith five others, was charged for offence punishable under Sections 302, 325 and 323 read with Section 34 IPC before the Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari for having committed the murder...

Kantibai and ors. Vs. Jagdishchandra

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Reported in : I(1993)DMC79

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Garg, Adv.

S.D. Jha, J.1.This revision petition by wife and two daughters of respondent-husband, is directed against the order dated 19-3-90 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Mandsaur, reversing the order dated 13-4-88 granting maintenance of Rs. 200/-per month...

Kasturi Lal (Deceased) Through L.Rs. Vs. Sadhu Ram and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13

Reported in : (2005)139PLR216

Advocate for Respondent : Rajesh Garg, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This petition filed by the landlord-petitioner under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity 'the Act') challenges judgment dated 26.9.1992 passed by the Appellate Authority, Gurdaspur whereby...

Anami Narayan Roy, Indian Inhabitant and ors. Vs. Suprakash Chakravart ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 8 and 8A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 32, 141, 142, 144, 164(1A), 245, 246 and 311; Advocates Act, 1961; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 4A; Prevention of Corruption Act; Indian Police Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954; India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3, 3(2), 6 and 7(1); Indian Police Services (Cadre) Rules, 1954; Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Services) Rules, 1981; All India Services (Deathcum Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16 and 16(1A); Indian Police Service (Pay) Rules, 1954 - Rule 3(2A); Central Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 10 and 10(5); Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR221; 2009(111)BomLR869

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Kadam, Adv. General, ;V.S. Masurkar and ;D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleaders for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P. (L) No. 2528/2008, ;I.M. Chagla, Sr. Adv. for Respondent No. 1 in W.P. (L) No. 2552

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. Rule in both the Writ Petitions. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, Rule called out and heard finally at the admission stage itself.Facts2. The State of Maharashtra vide its order...

Steel Furnace Association of India and ors. Vs. M.P. Electricity Board ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49

Reported in : 1995(0)MPLJ704

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Garg, Adv.

ORDERA.R. Tiwari, J.1. This order shall also govern the disposal of the connected other 12 petitions particularised as -(1) M. P. No. 1859/92 (M/s Madhumilan v. MPEB), (2) M. P. No. 1871/92 (M/s Chirag v. MPEB),...

Deena Alias Deen Dayal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144 and 354(5); Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 25, 25(1), 32, 36, 48, 72(1), 301, 303 and 304; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : AIR1983SC1155; 1983CriLJ1602; 1983(2)Crimes770(SC); 1983(2)SCALE340; (1983)4SCC645; [1984]1SCR1

Advocate for Respondent : K. Parasaran, Adv.

Y.V. Chandarchud, C.J. 1. In this batch of Writ Petitions, the petitioners were sentenced to death for the offence of murder Under Section 302 of the Penal Code. They have nothing in common except that they...

Supreme Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 129, 136, 139-A, 140, 141, 142, 161 and 215; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 9, 30, 33, 37, 38, 35(3), 42(1), 49 and 50; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections, 10, 12 and 15; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 320 or 321 or 482, 386 and 406-407

Reported in : AIR1998SC1895; 1998(2)BLJR1497; (1998)2GLR1711; JT1998(3)SC184; 1998(2)SCALE745; (1998)4SCC409; [1998]2SCR795; (1998)2UPLBEC1320; 1995IBR118; AIR 1998 SC 1845

Anand, J.1. In Re: Vinay Chandra Mishra, : 1995CriLJ3994 , this Court found the Contemner, an advocate, guilty of committing criminal contempt of Court for having interfered with and 'obstructing the course of justice by trying...

E.T. Sen (Retd.) Vs. Edatata Narayanan and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 19(1), 19(2), 129, 141, 143, 215, 366(10) and 372; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 500, 501 and 502

Reported in : AIR1969Delhi201; 1969CriLJ884; 5(1969)DLT348; ILR1969Delhi157

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Garg, ; S.C. Agarwal, ; A.K. Gupta and ;

Inder Deo Dua, C.J. 1. These two criminal original applications (Criminal Original Nos. 39 and 40 of 1868) by Brig. E T. Sen (Retd.) under section 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Article...

Aalishan Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Rajasthan Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1962 - Rule 39; Municipal Act, 1959

Reported in : 2002(1)WLC522

Advocate for Respondent : G.K. Garg, Adv.

Rathore, J. 1. The petitioner firm is dealing in consumer items like T.V. Video, Refrigerators etc.. The main business of this firm is of selling the aforesaid items, after purchasing the same from manufacturers of the...