Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: gangi reddy · Page 1 of about 265 results (0.181 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 16 2005

The Executive Engineer (Elecl) (O and M) Division, Karnataka Electrici ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-16-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 18, 23 to 25 and 54

Reported in : ILR2005KAR2183

Advocate for Respondent : K.P. Asok Kumar, G.A. for R1, ;G. Gangi Reddy, Adv. for R2, (A) to (F) and ;B. Rudra Gowda, Adv. for R2

S.R. Nayak, J.1. The beneficiary as well as the owners of the acquired land being aggrived by the awards passed by the Civil Court, have preferred these appeals under Section 54 of the land Acquisition Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2005

V. Narasimhaiah and anr. Vs. Special Deputy Commissioner and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-04-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 - Sections 4, 4(1) and 4(3); Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 - Sections 28(4) and 28(5)

Reported in : 2006(6)KarLJ678

Advocate for Respondent : Bharamagouda B. Goudar, High Court Government Pleader for Respondents 1 and 2, ;P.V. Chandrashekar, Adv. for Respondent-3 and ;Afsarunissa, Adv. for Respondent-4

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Writ petition is by persons, who had been granted land to an extent of two acres in old Sy. No. 153 (New Sy. No. 208) of Hoodi Village, Bangalore South Taluk, which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1997

Dr. H.P. Prabhuawamy and ors. Vs. Jayadeva Institute of Cardiology and ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-28-1997

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 16; Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2)

Reported in : ILR1997KAR833

Advocate for Respondent : G. Gangi Reddy, Adv. for R-1, ;M. Siddagangaiah, HCGP for State, ;M.R. Achar and Khaleemullah Shariff, Advs.

ORDERA.J. Sadashiva, J.1. In view of the principal question of law and the reliefs being one and the same, in all these petitions, they were heard together and disposed of by this common order.2. Writ Petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 27 1995

Raju Vs. Common Entrance Test Cell

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-27-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Selection of Candidates For Admission to Engineering, Medical and Dental Courses Rules, 1993

Reported in : ILR1996KAR74; 1995(6)KarLJ195

Advocate for Respondent : A.V. Srinivasa Reddy, Govt. Adv. for R1 and R3 and ;G. Gangi Reddy, Adv. for R-2

ORDERBharuka, J 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by the father of one C.L. Nagesh (hereinafter referred as 'Candidate') for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent-Principal to permit his son to join the College...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1998

Dhobi Ramaiah Vs. Dhobi Abbiga and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-17-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48-A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 1999(5)KarLJ178

Advocate for Respondent : Sri Gangi Reddy, Adv. and ;Sri Ashok B. Nayak, High Court Government Pleader

ORDER1. The petitioner has sought for quashing of the impugned order at Annexure-A dated 9-12-1988 passed by the 3rd respondent-Land Tribunal granting occupancy rights in favour of the first respondent for 2 acres 25 guntas of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1998

Dhobi Ramaiah Vs. Dhobi Abbiga and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-17-1998

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Advocate for Respondent : Gangi Reddy, Adv. for R-1 and ;Ashok B. Nayak, H.C.G.P. for R-3 and R-4

V. Gopala Gowda, J.1. The petitioner has sought for quashing of the impugned order at Annexure-A dated 9.12.1988 passed by the 3rd respondent Land Tribunal granting occupancy rights in favour of the first respondent for 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1928

Thubati Venkatakrishnayya and anr. Vs. Vajrala China Veerareddi and or ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-28-1928

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1928Mad1144

1. These second appeals arise out of the same suit and the facts out of which the suit arose may be stated as follows:One Vajrala Chinna Rami Reddi died intestate and issueless about 25 years before...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2000

Smt. Mahalakshmi and Another Vs. the Deputy Commissioner, Bellary Dist ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-02-2000

Subject : Election

Acts : Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 5(4) and 44(2); Constitution of India - Articles 38, 40, 46 and 243-D; Haryana Act - Sections 10(5), Rule 70(4)

Reported in : ILR2000KAR3576; 2000(6)KarLJ559

Advocate for Respondent : Sri K.N. Puttegowda, Additional Government Advocate and ;Sri K. Nageshwarappa, Adv.

ORDER1. Since the questions raised in both the petitions are similar and identical, both these petitions were heard together and are disposed of by this common order.2. The petitioners in these petitions are Members of Karekallu...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 1994

P.D. Mistry and Etc. Etc. Vs. Commissioner of Police, Bangalore and An ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-17-1994

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994CriLJ1746; ILR1994KAR1324; 1994(1)KarLJ505

Advocate for Respondent : Satish Doddamani, Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. The question involved in all these petitions either directly or indirectly have arisen from the applicability or otherwise of the Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusements (Bangalore City) Order, 1989 (in short the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1957

Kamalnarayan Ramsaranlal Vs. Ram Kishorelal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-05-1957

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5, 35, 45, 64 and 90; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 8, 10, 11 and 14

Reported in : AIR1958MP246

Advocate for Respondent : D.T. Mangalmurti, ;N.B. Chandurkar, ;W.M. Mukasdar and ;R.K. Pande, Advs.

1. The appellant Kamalnarayan was the defendant in the Court below. The present suit was filed by the two respondents Ram-kishorelal and Ramamijlal for a declaration that the defendant Kamalnarayan had committedbreaches of a public trust...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial