Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ganasekaran · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.010 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 25 1995

The Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-25-1995

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu State Housing and Act, 1961 - Sections 155; Constitution of India - Article 226; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1996Mad70

Advocate for Respondent : Mohan Panasaran, ;B.S. Ganasekaran, ;K. Doraisami, Sr. Counsel, for;M/s. Muthumani Doraisami,;V.N. Mohanraj, ;R. Kottarvel, ;G. Munirathanam,;P.B. Ramanujam,;D. Murugesan, ;V. Sumathi,;N. Kannadasan a

ORDERK. A. Swami, C.J.1. All these appeals are preferred by the State Government against the common order dated 10th September, 1991 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petitions 2430, 3203, 5976, 17785, 18365, 18442,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2001

Raj Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10

Reported in : (2002)ILLJ1107Mad

Advocate for Respondent : Ganasekaran, Adv.

ORDERV. Kanagaraj, J.1. All the above three Writ Petitions have been filed by different individual Petitioners as against the same Respondents No. 1 to 3 seeking for one and the same relief as against a common...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2002

Subhash Chandra Pandey and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-11-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (Regulation of Procedure) Act, 1985 - Sections 9 and 10; Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (Procedure and Conduct of Business) Rules 1976 - Rule 51; Uttar Pradesh Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 1982 - Rule 15(4)

Reported in : 2003(2)AWC1328; (2003)1UPLBEC548

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Singh, ;U.N. Sharma, ;B.N. Singh, Advs. and ;S.C.

G.P. Mathur, A.C.J.1. These petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution have been filed for quashing the result of U. P. Combined State/Upper Subordinate Services Examinations, conducted by U. P. Public Service Commission in the years...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 17 1989

Vanathaiyan and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-17-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 302, 304, 323 and 341; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2767

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Chakravarthi, Govt. Adv. for Public Prosecutor

1. A-1 (Vanathaiyan) and A-3 (Arokkiasamy) in SC No. 162 of 1981 on the file of the First Additional Sessions Judge, Tiruchirapalli, are the appellants. The appellants along with three others were tried in the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2016

K. Manikandan Vs. The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. The Chief Educat ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-02-2016

Subject : Education

(Prayer: In W.P.No. 9860 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impunged order passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial