Advanced Search Results

Amalgamated Commercial Traders (P.) Ltd. Vs. A.C.K. Krishnaswami and a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 207, 434 and 434(1)

Reported in : [1965]35CompCas456(SC)

Sikri, J. 1. These two appeals by certificate are directed against the judgment of the High Court of Madras, directing the winding up of the appellant, the Amalgamated Commercial Traders Private Limited, hereinafter referred to as...

Amalgamated Commercial Traders Private Ltd. Vs. C. Hariprasad

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 16 - Order XIX, Rule 27 - Order XXVIII, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR1966Mad161; (1965)2MLJ477

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. G. Ramaswami

ORDER(1) Application by the plaintiff to expunge certain words, passages and sentences from the affidavit of the respondent filed in Appln. No. 1838 of 1964 in C.S. 65 of 1964 on the file of this court,...

The Jawahar Mills Ltd. Vs. Sha Mulchand and Co. Ltd. (In Liquidation b ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 38 - Schedule - Regulations 24 to 30; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 25, 48, 49 and 120

Reported in : AIR1951Mad572

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Thiruvenkatachari, ;N.V.B. Sankar Rao and ;G. Vasanta Pai, Advs. for Respondent in No. 50, ;N. Sivarama Krishna Iyer and ;R. Viswanathan, Advs. for Respondent in No. 3

Satyanarayana Rao, J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of Clark J. arising out of proceedings under Section 38, Companies Act, to rectify the register. The respondent company was the applicant and the application was...

A.C.K. Krishnaswami Vs. Stressed Concrete Constructions Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : CompanyLimitation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 439; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1964Mad191

Advocate for Respondent : G. Vasanta Pai, ;Padmanabha Pai, ;A. Basil Philip and ;N. Ramachandran, Advs.

Veeraswami, J.1. This petition is by a creditor of the company for its compulsory winding up. The ground on which the petitioner seeks the order is that the company, in spite of his notice of demand...

B.N. Viswanathan and Anr. vs. Tiffin's Baryt Asbestos and Paints Ltd. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 30, 76, 79, 79(1), 79(2) and 83B; Indian Contract Act - Sections 182; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1953Mad520; [1953]23CompCas29(Mad); (1953)IMLJ346

Advocate for Respondent : G. Radhakrishnan and ;G. Vasanta Pai, Advs.

1. The question that arises for determination in this appeal is the validity of the election of the respondents as directors of a company called "Tiffin's Barytes Asbestos and Paints Limited", at a meeting of the...

National Textile Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. P.R. Ramakrishnan and Ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 439, 443, 445(3) and 450; Constitution of India - Article 43A; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 34; Administrative Law; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25FFF

Reported in : AIR1983SC75; [1983]53CompCas184(SC); (1983)1CompLJ1(SC); (1983)ILLJ45SC; (1983)IIMLJ1(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1144; (1983)1SCC228; [1983]1SCR922

Advocate for Respondent : G. Vasanta Pai, ; S.N. Kacker, ; O.C. Mathur, ;

P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. There three appeals by special leave raise a short but interesting question of law relating to the right of workmen employed in a company to appear and oppose a petition for winding up...

Public Prosecutor Vs. K.C. Ayyappan Pillai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Articles 20 and 265

Reported in : AIR1953Mad337; (1953)IMLJ157

Advocate for Respondent : G. Vasanta Pai, ;T. Krishna Rao, Advs. and ;Ramaprasada Rao, Adv. for ;John & Row

ORDERRamaswami, J.1. Crl.RC. Nos. 88 to 97, 99 to 105 and 108 of 1952: These are 18 connected criminal revision cases filed by the State against the convictions and sentences of the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Fort...

Shaik Mohammed Umar Saheb Vs. Kaleskar Hasham Karimsab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 26, Rule 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898- Sections 480 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 21(1) and 21(7)

Reported in : AIR1970SC61; 1970MHLJ289(SC); (1969)1SCC741; [1969]3SCR966

Advocate for Respondent : N.N. Keswani, Adv.

1. This is an appeal by special leave from an order of the Bombay High Court dismissing in limine an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and refusing to quash the judgment and...