Advanced Search Results
R. Gopala Pathar Vs. N. Jayalakshmi Ammal and ors.
Chennai
Jun-15-1984
FamilyProperty
Succeeds Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 108 and 168
AIR1984Mad340
K.V. Subramanian, Adv. and ;G. Subramanian, Amicus Curiae
1. The first defendant in O. S. No.'42 of 1973, Sub-court, Kumbakonam, is the appellant in this Second Appeal which arises out of a suit for a declaration of title to the property and for a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGordon Woodroffe Workers and Staff Union Vs. Joint Commissioner of Lab ...
Chennai
Feb-07-2000
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25F and 25N; Constitution of India - Article 226
(2000)IILLJ1150Mad
G. Subramanian, ;S. Jayaraman, ;Patty Jagannathan and ;Samuel Rajapandian, Advs.
ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of three writ petitions, they being W.P. Nos. 2336 of 1989, 1677 of 1989 and 13504 of 1993 as all the three writ petitions have one common ground of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.P. Sabapathi Pillai Vs. M. Durga
Chennai
Mar-19-1994
Tenancy
Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2) and 14(1)
AIR1995Mad13
G. Subramanian, Sr. Counsel
ORDER1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order passed in R.C.A. 332/92 on the file of Appellate Authority (IV Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras), in which the learned Appellate Authority had allowed the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
George Thomas Vs. Smt. Srividya and the Tax Recovery Officer Iv(1)
Chennai
Mar-04-2003
PropertyCivil
Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Sections 19 and 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 18, Rules 3 and 17 - Order 14, Rule 8; Evidence Act - Sections 155 and 165
AIR2003Mad290; 2003(1)CTC705; (2003)1MLJ823
G. Subramanian, Sr. Counsel for P.B. Ramanujam and P.B. Balaji
D. Murugesan, J. 1. All these appeals arise from the common judgment dated 08.06.1998 made in C.S. Nos. 866 of 1994, 485 of 1997 and 1505 of 1995. 2. For the purpose of convenience, Smt. Srividya...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHamsa Patel and Two ors. Vs. S. Balakrishnan and anr.
Chennai
Feb-19-1997
Tenancy
Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection Act, 1921 - Sections 2(4), 9, 9A and 11; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115
1997(1)CTC367
G. Subramanian, Sr. Counsel for ;V. Venkataswami and ;S. Kadarkarai, Advs.
ORDERKanakaraj, J. 1. All the four appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent arise out of a suit filed by the two respondents in the appeals, against the appellants and two others, who had remained...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Gopirathnam and Four Others Vs. Ferrodous Estate (Pvt) Ltd., Rep. b ...
Chennai
Dec-08-1997
contractproperty
Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1978 -- Sections 4, 5(3), 6, 10(3), 11(1), 17, 19, 20 and 24; Specific Relief Act, 1963 -- Sections 14; Contract Act, 1872 -- Sections 5, 23, 23 and 84-C; Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Lands) Act, 58 of 1961
1998(2)CTC182
Mr.G. Subramanian,;Senior Counsel for Mr.V. Ramajagadeesan, Adv.
ORDERJudgement Pronounced by Shivaraj Patil, J.1. Heard the leaned senior counsel for the parties.2. The defendants in the suit O.S. No.130 of 1981 have filed this appeal aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 15.3.1991 made...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Rama Naidu and 6 ors. Vs. S.K. Parthasarathy Naidu and 2 ors.
Chennai
Sep-27-2001
CommercialCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 114 - Order 47, Rule 1
AIR2002Mad287; (2002)1MLJ186
G. Subramanian, Sr. Counsel for K. Singaravelu and ;T. Arulraj, Adv.
ORDER1. 'Justice is a virtue which transcends all barriers. Neither the rules of procedures nor technicalities of law can stand in its way. ....Even the law bends before justice..... If the Court finds that the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAll India Bharat Overseas Bank Employees' Union Vs. Bharat Overseas Ba ...
Chennai
Jun-17-1998
Labour and Industrial
Constitiution of India - Articles 12 and 226
(1998)IILLJ1181Mad
G. Subramanian and ;T.S. Gopalan, Advs. for Respondent No. 1 and ;S. Veeraghavan, Addl. C.G.S.C. for Respondent No. 2
Raju, J.1. The above appeals and the Writ Petitions have been at the common request of the learned counsel appearing on either side, heard together since not only the parties to the proceedings are one and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Oxygen Employees' Union and Ors. Vs. BOC India Ltd. (Formerly I ...
Chennai
Sep-24-1998
Labour and Industrial
Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 72 and 95; Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulation, 1950 - Regulations 92 and 97; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 19(1); Companies Act, 1956
(1998)IILLJ1248Mad
A.L. Somayaji, Adv. for Gupta & Ravi in W.A. No. 254/1998, ;S. Ramasubramanian, Adv. for S. Jayaraman in W.P. No. 8503/1997 and ;G. Subramanian, Adv. for T.S. Gopalan & Co. in W.P. Nos. 3117 a
E. Padmanabhan, J.1. The above Writ Appeal and the writ petitions were taken up together for final disposal.2. Mr. N.G.R.Prasad, learned counsel appeared for the appellant in W.A.No. 254/1998, W.P.Nos. 479/1998, 8503/1997. Mr. A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Tribol Engineering Private Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director ...
Chennai
Oct-12-1998
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 11, 12, 20(4) 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 8, Rule 6A
1998(3)CTC385
Mr. G. Subramanian, Senior Counsel for R1, Adv.
ORDERJudgement pronounced by Shivappa, J. 1. The C.M.P.No. 10631 of 1998 has been filed for removal of respondent No.2 Arbitrator on the ground of reasonable apprehension of bias and to appoint an independent Arbitrator in his...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »