Advanced Search Results

Sanjiv Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Medical Central Council Act, 1970

Reported in : (1999)122PLR199

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Gill, D.A.G. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 and; Gur Rattan Pal Singh, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 a

Harjit Sngh Bedi, J.1. This judgment will dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos. 16015 of 1998 and 16016 of 1998. The facts have been taken from Civil Writ Petition No. 16015 of 1998.2. The petitioners Sanjiv...

Mamta Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B

Reported in : II(2003)DMC365

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Gill, Sr. DAG

R.L. Anand, J.1. Smt. Mamta, wife of Shri Mohinder Lal Khatri by caste, aged 62 years resident of Gali Jattanwali, inside Lahori Gate, Amritsar, has filed the present criminal appeal and it has been directed against...

Shariff Khan Vs. Rajasthan State Election Commission and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Rajasthan Panchayati Raj (Election) Rules, 1994 - Rules 29, 48, 48(2), 48A, 48B, 48(B)(2)(1), 48C, 49B, 80 and 86(1); Panchayat Act - Sections 80 and 120; Constitution of India - Articles 213O, 226, 243K, 243O, 324, 324(1), 324(4) and 329

Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj1022

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Gill, AAG and; Manish Bhandari, Adv.

K.S. Rathore, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks direction to declare the Rule 48-C and 49-B as invalid and void. Besides this, the petitioner also prayed to quash the notification dated 25.1.1995 issued by...

Smt. Raj Rani Vs. Kaushalya Devi and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : (2000)124PLR323

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Gill, Sr. Adv.; and G.S. Gill, Adv.

R.L. Anand, J.1. This is a landlord's revision under Section 15 of the East Punjab Urban Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter called the Act) and has been directed against the judgment dated 19.1.1983 passed by the Court...

Darshan Singh Sodhi Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 182, 279, 304A, 323, 355, 420, 452, 466, 468, 471, 500, 504 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 46, 152(2), 156(1), 161, 173, 239, 439 and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 561A

Reported in : 1997CriLJ3221

Advocate for Respondent : G.S, Gill, AAG.

ORDERR.L. Anand, J. 1. Head 1 win tail you lose is an English proverb, which aptly applies to the petitioner-Darshan Singh Sodhi, who is seeking quashment of F.I.R, No. 181 dated 4th December, 1989 under Sections...

Prashant Sapre Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj2124; 2006(2)WLC668

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Gill, AAG

Ashok Parihar, J.1. Since on similar set of facts, same relief has been claimed, all the above writ petitions have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.2. Admittedly, the petitioners had been...

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Adviser to the Administration, Union Terri ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Government Residence (Chandigarh Administration Pool) Allotment Rules, 1972 - Rules 2, 3A, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 17 and 26; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227;

Reported in : AIR1996P& H69

Advocate for Respondent : S. Kohili, President and High Court Employees Union

ORDERHarjit Singh Bedi, J.1. Mr. K. G. Verma, an 1AS officer of the rank of Financial Commissioner (1965 batch) in the Haryana Government, filed Civil Writ Petition No. 12688 of 1993 (K. G. Verma v. UnionTerritory...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Nazar Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - Sections 42

Reported in : (2003)134PLR227

Advocate for Respondent : J.R. Mittal, Sr. Adv. and; B.D. Sharma, Adv.

R.L. Anand, J. 1. This is a defendants appeal and has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 10.12.1979, passed by the Court of learned District Judge, Bhatinda, who, dismissed the appeal of Union of...

Ajith Kumar.D Vs. CochIn Port Trust Rep.by Secretary and ors

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE9H DAY OF DECEMBER201318TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 6326 of 2011 (M) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- AJITH KUMAR.D., ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) COCHIN...

Rahul Verma Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bela M. Trivedi, J. 1. The petitioner, in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for issuance of directions against the respondent No.2-Jaipur Municipal Corporation to register the marriage...