Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: g rajagopal · Page 1 of about 281 results (0.162 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 25 2007

Vishwanath Swami Vs. the Tamil Nadu Information Commission Rep. by Its ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-25-2007

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 4, 5(1), 7, 8, 8(1), 19(8), 24 and 24(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 419, 380 and 506; Criminal Rules - Rule 339

Reported in : (2007)6MLJ1141

Advocate for Respondent : G. Rajagopal, Sr. Counsel for G.R. Associates, for R1 and ;A. Edwin Prabakar, Addl. Government Pleader assisted by L.S.M. Hasan Fizal, Government Adv. for R2 and R3

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. The petitioner, as a party-in-person has filed this writ petition for a direction to the first respondent to forthwith ensure compliance of the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 1998

Bharathidasan University, Palkalai Perur, Tiruchirapalli Rep. by Its R ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-21-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 -- Sections 2, 4 (1 and 2), 10, 11, 15(1 and 2), 22(1 and 2), 23(1 and 2); Bharathidasan University Act, 1991; All-India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 -- Sections 33; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, Amendment Act of 1993; National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993; Dowry (Prohibition) Act, 1961

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC236; (2001)8SCC676; AIR2001SC2861

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. N.R. Chandran, Additional Solicitor General for;Mr. R. Santhanam and;Mr. G. Rajagopal, Advocates

ORDERJudgement Pronounced by Shivaraj Patil, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. In these appeals, in the tight of the contentions raised by the parties, the only question that needs to be answered is, whether...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2010

The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission Rep. by Its Secretary, Omanth ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-2010

Subject : Right to information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 6(2), 7, 8, 8(1), 9, 19 and 24; ;Constitution of India - Articles 16, 14, 19(1), 315, 317, 320(1) and 320(3)

Advocate for Respondent : G. Rajagopal, SC for; G.R. Associates for R1,; V.R. Raja

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. In all the six writ petitions, the petitioner is the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (for short TNPSC) represented by its Secretary. The challenge made in these writ petitions are the orders passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 09 2011

Makkal Sakthi Katchi and ors. Vs. the Election Commission of India and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-09-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.G.Rajagopal, Advs.

O R D E R1. The Honble The Chief Justice Since, in these writ petitions common relief had been sought for, they have been heard and disposed of by this common order.2. The common relief sought...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2012

G. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-31-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

COMMON ORDER P. JYOTHIMANI,J. The issue involved in all these cases relates to the commissioning of Units 1 and 2 of Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project (for brevity, "KNPP"). Even though the prayers in these writ petitions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2023

Sri. T. Satheesh vs the Devaswom Commissioner,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-19-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. GIRISH TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA, TDB REPORT NO. 48/2020 IN COMPLAINT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2012

V.Gomathy Vs. the Vice Chancellor

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-22-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms.Narmadha Sampath, Adv.

This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records in Proc.No.E1(1)/1043/2010, dated 25.10.2010 passed by the second respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2026

The State of Kerala vs Sri.Ravindran Nair

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-20-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

LA.App..No.36 OF 2016 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN LAR 122/2013 DATED 31-08-2015 APPELLANT/CLAIMANT: JOSE, S/O.AUGUSTY, AGED 63 YEARS, ANANDAVILASATHIL, PARATHATTEL, CHITTOOR, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 608. BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN SRI.DIPU JAMES SRI.GEORGE MATHEW SRI.M.D.SASIKUMAR...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2016

The Secretary to Government (Expenditure) Finance Department, Secretar ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-07-2016

Subject : Education

M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Appellant/Respondent has preferred the present intra court Writ Appeal as against the Order dated 28.04.2014 in W.P. No.11105 of 2014 passed by the Learned Single Judge. 2. The Learned Single Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2024

Salish Sham Viswan vs Singing Artists Association Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-16-2024

Subject : Intellectual Property

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 27TH MAGHA, 1945 PETITIONER: SALISH SHAM VISWAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.K.A.VISWAMBHARAN, PROPRIETOR, SINGING ARTISTS...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial