Advanced Search Results

Durga and ors. Vs. Pohlu

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 115; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 17 and 21; ;Bilaspur (Courts) Order, 1949 - Section 35

Reported in : AIR1952HP48

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Prashar, Adv.

ORDERChowdhry, J.C. 1. This is a defendants' application in revision against the judgment and decree of the learned pistrict Judge of Bilaspur, dated 30-8-1950, passing a decree in terms of the award in the course of...

Beli Ram and anr. Vs. Sada Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Bilaspur (Courts) Order, 1949

Reported in : AIR1952HP23

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Prashar, Adv.

ORDERChowdhury, J.C.1. This is a plaintiff's application in revision, and it arises in the following circumstances.2. One Mt. Waziru conferred occupancy rights in 46 bighas odd land on her son-in-law Rajmal for a consideration of Rs....

Ramakant Dixit Vs. Director General of Health Services and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Central Civil Service (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965 - Rule 5

Reported in : 1985(8)DRJ111

S.S. Chadha, J.(1) This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated August 6, 1981, terminating the services of the petitioner in pursuance of the...

Jindu and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 115 and 151 - Order 41, Rule 23 - Order 43, Rule 1(4); ;Himachal Pradesh (Courts) Order, 1948; ;Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 - Section 9

Reported in : AIR1957HP61

Advocate for Respondent : N.D. Gupta, Govt. Adv. for No. 1 and; M.L. Sud, Adv. on behalf of Vig., Adv. for No. 2 in S.A. No. 45

Ramabhadran, J.C. 1. These four second appeals were heard during the present circuit to Bilaspur. The appeals involve some common points for determination, relating to the powers of the erstwhile Raja of Bilaspur, prior to the...

Kansi Ram Vs. Jai Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6 Rule 4; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 137; ;Partnership Act, 1932 - Section 13

Reported in : AIR1956HP4

Advocate for Respondent : Tek Chand, Adv. for Respondents (1 to 5)

Ramabhadran, J.C.1. This is a plaintiffs appeal, which arises out of a suit to recover a sum of Rs. 8,500/- (Rs. 5,000- principal plus Rs. 3,500/-interest) on the basis of a loan, alleged to have been...