Advanced Search Results

W.W. Joshi and ors. Vs. State of Bombay and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 59(2), 87, 88, 116 and 116(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 124, 218, 226, 227, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 324; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 9; Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1944; Indian Independence (Rights, Property and Liabilities) Order, 1947 - Article 10

Reported in : AIR1959Bom363; (1959)61BOMLR829; ILR1959Bom1267

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Mudholkar, Asst. Spl. Govt. Pleader and ;N.B. Chandurkar, Adv.

Tambe, J. 1. An important question of law arises out of a preliminary objection raised in behalf of the State of Bombay. The preliminary objection raised relates to the maintainability of the petition against the present...

Anant Vishnu Khare Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR371

Tambe, J.1. Petitioners Anant Vishnu Khare and Ramchandra Brijlal have filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India wherein they pray for issuance of a writ of certiorari or such other...

Sawatram Ramprasad Mills Company Ltd. Vs. Kundanmal Sardarmal Jain

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR1511; (1960)ILLJ63Bom

Tambe, J. 1. This is a petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India in which the petitioner the Sawatram Ramprasad Mills Company, Ltd., Akola, seeks to get quashed order dated 7 May,...

Narayan Bansi Vs. Ratanlal Jankilal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR236

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. B.R. Mandlekar

Tambe, J. 1. Petitioner Narayan and Ratanlal, respondant No. 1 hereto, were the two contesting candidates at the general election of the Amravati Town Muncipal Committee in Vidarbha. They were contesting for a seat from ward...

Joshi W.W. Vs. State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : State Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 8, 59(2), 87, 88, 116 and 116(1); Constitution of India - Articles 124, 218, 248, 226, 227, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 324; Indian Independence (Rights, Property and Liabilities) Order, 1947 - Article 10; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 9; Bengal Agricultural Incometax Act, 1944; Indian Independence (Legal Proceedings) Order, 1947

Reported in : (1959)IILLJ485Bom

Tambe, J.1. An important question of law arises out of a preliminary objection raised on behalf of the State of Bombay. The preliminary objection raised relates to the maintainability of the petition against the present State...

Ganesh Narayan and ors. Vs. Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpurand o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1957 - Sections 3(4); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 5-A and 17(4)

Reported in : AIR1965Bom92; (1964)66BOMLR807; ILR1965Bom200; 1965MhLJ577

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Mudholkar, Addl. Govt. Pleader

Tambe, J.(1) All these applications can be disposed of together as one of the questions released in these applications is common and that question relates to the legality and validity of sub-section (4) of Section 3...

Ramrao Laxmikant Shirkhedkar Vs. Accountant General, Maharashtra and a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 166, 226, 309, 311 and 311(2); Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1955 - Rules 1(1), 4(A), 5, 6, 8, 9, 13 and 17; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Rules 4, 8, 13, 15, 22 and 23; Essential Services Maintenance Ordinance, 1960 - Sections 5; Mineral Concession Rules, 1949 - Rules 26, 26(3), 57, 59 and 60; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Housing, Town Planning, Etc. Act, 1909; Madras Government Business Rules; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3; Railway Service (Conduct) Rules; All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1954

Reported in : AIR1963Bom121; (1963)65BOMLR65; ILR1962Bom664; 1963MhLJ205

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Mudholkar, Addl. Govt. Pleader

Abhyankar, J.1. This judgment will also dispose of Special Civil Application No. 240 of 1961.2. Special Civil Application No. 175 of 1961 is filed by one Shri R.D. Shirkhedkar. He was serving in the Office of...

Manik Sadashiv and ors. Vs. Krishnabai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 132; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 82, 92, 95 and 100

Reported in : AIR1964Bom284; (1964)66BOMLR515; 1964MhLJ595

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Mudholkar, Adv.

1. The only question that arises in this appeal is one of limitation. The relevant facts are as follows: On 18-5-1933 one Anant for himself and as the guardian of his minor son mortgaged to one...

Nagpur Hotel Owner's Association and Ors. Vs. State of Maharshtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections Sections 2, 3(1), 5(2) and 30(2); Constitution of India , Articles 226 and 254(2)

Reported in : AIR1965Bom169; (1965)67BOMLR206; ILR1965Bom387; (1965)IILLJ482Bom; 1965MhLJ429

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Mudholkar, Addl. Govt. Pleader

Paranjpe, J.(1) In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners have prayed that two notifications under the Minimum Wages Act, as locally amended, should be quashed.(2) Acting under section 3 read with section...

The Vidarbha Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. Vs. Sales Tax Officer ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 10(3), 11(5), 11-A, 16 and 22-C

Reported in : (1963)65BOMLR238; 1963MhLJ5; [1963]14STC430(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Mudholkar, Additional Government Pleader

Kotval, J.1. These are matters which arise under the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 (XXI of 1947). They are both directed against the orders levying a penalty upon the petitioner, the Vidarbha Co-operative...