Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: g p · Page 1 of about 19,554 results (0.825 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 07 2006

Prabhakar S. Thakur Vs. Mahrashtra Housing and Area Development Author ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 19, 19(1), 19(5), 20, 20(3), 20(5), 22(8), 22, 22B, 22C, 22C(7), 22C(8), 22D and 22E; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Evidence Act, 1872; Pension Rules

Reported in : 2006(4)BomCR305; (2006)IIILLJ187Bom; 2006(4)MhLj685

Advocate for Respondent : P.D. Anklesaria, Special Senior Counsel and ;S. Shreedharan, A.G.P.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this Appeal, the Appellant is challenging the judgment and order dated 17.12.2004 passed by the learned Single Judge, allowing the Writ Petition filed by Respondent No. 1 State of Maharashtra and Respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 1996

Yogiraj Kishanrao Since Dead by Lrs. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-10-1996

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 12, 16 and 33

Reported in : 1997(4)ALLMR106; 1997(2)BomCR226; (1996)98BOMLR600

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for respondent No. 1 and ;M.V. Deshpande, Adv. for respondents No. 3 and 4

R.G. Deshpande, J.1. By the present petition, the petitioners are challenging the order, dated 22-1-1985, passed by the Member, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Aurangabad, in Revenue Appeal No. 89/A-84-Beed, whereby the learned Member of the Maharashtra Revenue...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2004

Govind Kanu Madhavi (Since Deceased, Through His Legal Heirs and Repre ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-29-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 9, 9(3), 9(4), 10, 18 to 28, 28(A) and 28A(3); Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR61; (2005)107BOMLR790; 2004(4)MhLj216

Advocate for Respondent : G.A. Mulekar, A.G.P. for the State

P.V. Kakade, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 6.1.1988 passed by the Civil Judge, Sr.Divn., Alibag in L.A.R. No. 62 of 1982.2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant claimant as well as the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 04 2005

Ajit Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-04-2005

Subject : Election

Acts : Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 140; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 80A(2), 81, 82, 83, 86 and 117; G.P. Act, 1993; G.P. Rules; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Advocate for Respondent : Rajeshwar Prasad, G.P. 6

V.N. Sinha, J. 1. Heard Sri S.N.P. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajeshwar Prasad, G.P. 6 for the State of Bihar and its functionaries, State Election Commission and its functionaries and private Respondents, who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1998

Chacko P.C. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-19-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Regulating Conditions of Service, Duties, Remuneration etc. of Advocate General Rules - Rule 2; Kerala Government Law Officers (Appointment and Conditions of Service) and Conduct of Cases Rules, 1978 - Rules 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(2(1)), 19(10), 19(11) and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24, 321, 378, 407(5) and 439; Kerala High Court Rules, 1971 - Rule 173; Constitution of India - Article 165

Reported in : (1998)IILLJ587Ker

Advocate for Respondent : K.P.G. Menon, Spl. G.P. and; K. Jayakumar, G.P.

A.C. Lakshmanan, J.1. Though a Division Bench of this Court, in the decision reported in 1997 (1) KLT 788 expressed their displeasure and sorrow by the unseemly controversy between the Advocate General (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2011

Kashinath Shivba Khillare Vs. Fuley Magasvarg Vikas Mahamandal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-11-2011

Subject : Service

Acts : Employment Service Rules 1983 - Rule 15

1]Heard Mrs. Deshpande for petitioner, advocate Marathe for respondent no.1, advocate Rahul Dhande for respondent no.3 & 4 and learned A.G.P. Shri Sonak for respondent no.2. Nobody appears for respondent no.5. 2] Short grievance of advocate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1986

Mohant Dharam Das Chela Karam Parkash Vs. Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandha ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-22-1986

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 - Sections 7(1), 7(3), 7(4), 8, 12 and 14

Reported in : AIR1987P& H64

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Narinder Singh

D.S. Tewatia, J.1. The State Government on receiving a petition under S.7(1) of the Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925, hereinafter referred to as the Act, seeking a declaration that the institution known as 'Gurdwara Sahib Padshahi Naumi,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2011

Subhash S/O Babulal Rajput Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Sep-09-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Section 4,

1. Heard Learned Counsel for the revision applicant and learned A.G.P. for respondent No.1. Though respondent No.2 - Acquiring Body served, none appears for it. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1996

Smt. Savitri G. Sachnandani and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-18-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 10; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 1996(3)BomCR674; (1996)98BOMLR271

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Gokhale, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;S.P. Kanuga, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

A.P. Shah, J.1. By this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioners are mainly seeking two reliefs. Firstly, they are seeking a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2002

Mirza Kadir Baig Rasul Baig Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-19-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986 - Sections 7; Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987 - Rules 3(1) and 6

Reported in : 2003(4)BomCR672

Advocate for Respondent : V.M. Humbe, Adv. for respondent No. 4, ;S.P. Sonpawale, Adv. for respondent No. 2, ;N.L. Jadhav, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 3

A.B. Naik, J.1. By this writ petition the petitioner challenges the order passed by the Collector, Parbhani, in File No. 2000-MVN-1-P-CR-5, dated 10-9-2002. In order to appreciate the points involved in this petition, following undisputed facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial