Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: g n sharma · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.148 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 02 1991

State of Bihar and anr. Vs. P.P. Sharma, Ias and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-02-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 173, 197, 197(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 409, 420, 468, 469 and 471; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1991SC1260; 1991(2)BLJR767; (1991)2CompLJ197(SC); 1991CriLJ1438; 1991(2)Crimes113(SC); JT1991(2)SC147; 1992Supp(1)SCC222; [1991]2SCR1; 1992SCC(Cri)192

Advocate for Respondent : Shanker Ghose, ; R.K. Jain, ; Rakesh K. Khanna, ;

Kuldip Singh, J. 1. The Bihar State cooperative Marketing Union Limited (BISCOMAUN) (hereinafter called 'BISCO') is an apex body operating in the State of Bihar. It is a federation of Cooperative Societies and its primary function...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2014

Shiv @ Rinku Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-22-2014

Subject : Criminal

CRM No.M- 41460 of 2013(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-41460 of 2013(O&M) DECIDED ON : April 22, 2014 Shiv @ Rinku ..........Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana ........Respondent CORAM...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 2000

Trilochan Singh Vs. Pushpa Builders Ltd.

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on : Aug-30-2000

Subject : MRTP

Rumnita Mittal, Member: 1. The case of the complainant, in the present complaint in brief, is that opposite party No. 1 is a builder of residential and commercial complexes in Delhi and opposite party No. 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 06 2014

NaIn Singh Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 09, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: January 06, 2014 + W.P.(C) 1215/2011 NAIN SINGH Represented by: .....Petitioner Ms.Nisha Priya Bhatia, Advocate with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2014

Crm-m-no. 1651 of 2014 Vs. the State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-17-2014

Subject : Education

CRM-M-No.1651 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-No.1651 of 2014 Date of Decision : 17.01.2014 Smt. Sardari and another ...Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2014

Crm No. M-22897 of 2014. Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-17-2014

Subject : MRTP

CRM No.M-22897 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-22897 of 2014. Date of Decision : 17.07.2014. Anuj ...Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE TEJINDER...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2007

Haridas Das Vs. Smt. Usha Rani Banik and ors. and Apu Banik

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-16-2007

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19

Reported in : AIR2007SC2688; 2007(5)ALD43(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(4)CHN27; 2007(2)JKJ77[SC]; 2007(3)KLT587(SC); (2007)6MLJ274(SC); 2006MPLJ226(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Party-in-person, ; Contemnor-in-person and ; P.K. Chakravarty

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. 'Judge bashing' and using derogatory and contemptuous language against Judges has become a favourite pastime of some people. These statements tend to scandalize and lower the authority of the Courts and can not...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2000

Administrator General, U.P. Allahabad Vs. Narendra Pal Singh (Decd.) T ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-19-2000

Subject : Family

Acts : Administrator General Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 10(2), 12 and 25; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 15(1) and (2)

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2662

Advocate for Respondent : K.B.L. Gaur, ;G.N. Sharma, ;K.N. Tripathi, ;K.M. Sinha, ;N.C. Upadhyaya, ;D.P. Singh, ;R.P. Misra, ;Dhruva Sharma, ;K.M. Dwivedi, ;K.C. Saxena, ;Tej Pal, ;B.B. Paul, ;R.N. Bhalla, ;Ajit Kumar and ;R.

M. C. Jain, J.1. Applications : A-157, A-158 and A-I59.--The dispute relates to the estate of one Kunwar Girwar Singh, who died on 24.5.1971 leaving behind agricultural land and vast immovable properties situate in different cities...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1998

Brijesh Kumar Mahraj Vs. Brij Sunder Lal and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-07-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53 and 53A; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 27 - Schedule - Articles 64, 65 and 144; Evidence Act - Sections 90 and 90A

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC2261

Advocate for Respondent : M.C. Joshi, ;G.N. Sharma, ;N.K. Sharma, ;Rajeshwar Tewari and ;V.K. Agarwal, Advs.

R.N. Ray, J.1. Plaintiff-appellant has filed this appeal being aggrieved by the Judgment and decree passed in Civil Appeal No. 205 of 1977 by Shri Shital Singh, Additional Civil Judge, Mathura on 20.8.1981 and that appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1951

Nanagram Vs. Ghinsilal

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-24-1951

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Jaipur Rent Control Order, 1947 - Sections 6(2)

Reported in : AIR1952Raj107

Advocate for Respondent : G.N. Sharma, Adv.

Ranawat, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners Nanagram and Ballilal are the owners of a shop in Johri Bazar of which the opposite party Ghinsi Lal is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial