Advanced Search Results

Devi Singh Vs. Smt. Sushila Devi

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13, 13(1) and 13-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1980Raj48; 1979()WLN331

Advocate for Respondent : G.M. Mehta, Adv.

S.K. Mal Lodha, J.1. This appeal, under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act (No. XXV of 1955) (which will hereinafter for the sake of brevity be referred to as 'the Act') by the husband, who...

Hakim Mohammed Ali Vs. Bhanwari Bai

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) Act, 1976 - Sections 24, 38 and 39

Reported in : AIR1981Raj176; 1981()WLN214

Advocate for Respondent : G.M. Mehta, Adv.

ORDERM.C. Jain, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated November 23, 1979 passed by the Additional Munsif and Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Jodhpur, in execution case No. 8/1977, whereby the judgment-debtor petitioner's objection,...

Nyaya Panchayat Nagar District, Bharatpur Vs. Munsiff Magistrate, Deeg ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 - Sections 49

Reported in : 1970(3)WLN1

Advocate for Respondent : G.M. Mehta, Adv. for;Govt. Adv.

ORDERKan Singh, J.1. The writ petition before me, which has been lodged by the Nyaya Panchayat Nagar, raises a question whether the Nyaya Panchayat could, in a criminal case triable by it, take a bond from...

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rajasthan Wires (P) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)81TTJ(JP.)673

1. These cross-appeals have been preferred against the order dt. 1st March, 2001 passed by Shri B.S. Dhillon, the learned CIT(A) for asst.yr. 1995-96.2. The Hon'ble Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature has directed...

State of Rajasthan Vs. Kapoor Chand

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 10(7) and 16; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 18

Reported in : AIR1967Raj237; 1967CriLJ1374

Advocate for Respondent : D.S. Shishodhiya, Adv.

B.P. Beri, J.1. The Sub-divisional Magistrate, Salumber acquitted Kapoorchand by his judgment dated 12th March, 1965 in a case under Sections 7 and 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The State of Rajasthan has...

R.S. Bhandari Vs. Income-tax Department and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 237 and 241; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1995]214ITR735(Raj)

Advocate for Respondent : G.S. Bapna, Adv. and; Sudhir Gupta, Adv. for respondent No. 5

V.K. Singhal, J. 1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the action of the Income-tax Department in not issuing advice to the bank for refund of the amount of Rs. 33,67,369 for which...

Viney Kumar Majoo Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25B, 25F and 25G; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1964; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : AIR1968Raj227; (1968)IILLJ398Raj

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Munshi, Addl. Govt. Adv. and; G.M. Mehta, Dy. Govt. Adv.

ORDERKan Singh, J. 1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution by one Viney Kumar Majoo and say it he questions the validity of an order dated 8-9-67 (Ex. 6 on record)...

Pritam Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9 and 80; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 394

Reported in : AIR1971Raj184; 1971CriLJ974; 1970(3)WLN38

Advocate for Respondent : G.M. Mehta, Adv.

Mehta, J. 1. On August 25, 1967, at about 8 P. M. accused Pritam Singh, Dalip Singh, Ranki and Chandra Sahai. armed with pistols and knives, entered the house of the complainant Tekchand, situate in Ganganagar,...

The Mahalaxmi Mills Co. Ltd., Beawar and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 94(1), 97, 97(1), 97(2) and 97(3); Companies (Central Government) General Rules, 1956 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1968Raj331; [1969]39CompCas347(Raj)

Advocate for Respondent : G.M. Mehta, Adv.

ORDERC.B. Bhargava, J.1. This is an application in revision by Mahalaxmi Mills Company Limited. Beawar, its four Directors viz., Pannalal Kothari, Navratanmal Kothari, Kastur Chand Mehta, Amarchand Kothari and Deo Dutt Takiar. Secretary against the order...

Narayan Singh Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 423

Reported in : AIR1968Raj46

Advocate for Respondent : G.M. Mehta, Deputy Govt. Adv.

ORDERB.P. Beri, J.1. Narayan Singh, a truck driver, was convicted by the Munsiff-Magistrate, Bharatpur under Section 338 of the Indian Penal Code to six months' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal the learned Sessions Judge, Bharatpur mentioned the...