Advanced Search Results
G.P. Agrawal and ors. Vs. Rajasthan Housing Board and ors.
Rajasthan
Dec-11-2007
Service
RLW2008(2)Raj1537
Mr. G.K. Garg
ORDERK.S. Rathore, J.1. Since these two review petitions are involving similar question of law, therefore, they are being decided by this common order. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioners are B.E. and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Dhan Vs. the Judge, Labour Court No. 2 and ors.
Rajasthan
Jan-20-2003
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17B
(2003)IILLJ959Raj; RLW2003(2)Raj999; 2003(2)WLC485
G.K. Garg and; Saransh Saini, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
Keshote,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Admit.3. Shri G.K. Garg and Shri Saransh Saini, Advocates, waives the service of notices for respondents No. 2 and 3. The respondent No. 1 is neither necessary nor...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.K. Kumbhaj (Dr.) Vs. University of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
May-09-2005
ServiceConstitution
University of Rajasthan Act, 1946 - Sections 2; University of Rajasthan (Amendment) Act, 1984; Rajasthan Universities' Teachers and Officers (Selection for Appointment) Act of 1947 - Sections 4, 4(1) and 4(3); University of Rajasthan Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 5, 5(1), 5(2), 5(7), 10, 11 and 18(1); University of Rajasthan Rules - Rules 3(3) and 11; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16
RLW2006(1)Raj89; 2005(3)WLC542
A.K. Sharma and; G.K. Garg, Advs.
Ashok Parihar, J.1. Education, as the rest of the civilised world knows, is the surest way of eradicating the social and economic evils that plague our society. Without education democracy loses its meaning, efficacy and aspirations....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dutch Opthalmic Research Centre Vs. Ultramed Private Limited
Rajasthan
Feb-23-2005
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 16, Rule 19 - Order 26, Rules 1, 4, 5, 15 and 16
AIR2005Raj213; RLW2005(2)Raj1485; 2005(2)WLC740
G.K. Garg, Adv.
K.S. Rathore, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 8.12.2004 passed by the Additional District Judge (Fast Track) No. 3, Jaipur City, Jaipur in civil suit No. 102/04 by which the application filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh NaraIn Podar Vs. Official Liquidator of Jaipur Spinning and Wea ...
Rajasthan
Sep-21-2005
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 458A, 543, 543(1) and 543(2); Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 137
III(2006)BC102; [2006]133CompCas843(Raj); RLW2005(4)Raj2952; 2006(1)WLC110
G.K. Garg, Adv.
Ajay Rastogi, J.1. Instant special appeal has been filed by non-applicants against order dt.19.4.91 passed by learned Single Judge in Company Application No. 15/98, whereby preliminary objection raised by appellant with regard to filing of application...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRukmani Devi (Smt.) Vs. Prabhu Narayan and ors.
Rajasthan
May-25-2007
Property
RLW2007(4)Raj2882
Mr. G.K. Garg
Vineet Kothari, J.1. This appeal of defendant Smt. Rukmani Devi wife of Hari Narain is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge No. 5, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Civil Suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMukat Behari Lal Vs. Shiv Charan Singh and ors.
Rajasthan
Mar-31-1972
Election
1978(11)WLN161
Mr. G.K. Garg
M.L. Shrimal, J.1. In the General Elections of 1977, 20 persons filed nomination papers from the Bayana constituency for election to the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly, all of which were found on scrutiny to be valid. Among...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Lal and anr. Vs. Dwarka Prasad and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-15-2007
Civil
AIR2007Raj129; RLW2007(3)Raj2656
Vineet Kothari, J.1. Two important questions of law arise for consideration in the present. first appeal and on this arguments of not only learned Counsel for the appellants and respondents were heard by this Court at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Brijendra Singh
Rajasthan
Mar-22-2006
Service
Rajasthan Municipal (Subordinate and Ministerial Service) Rules, 1963 - Rules 8, 10, 12, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22 and 27
[2006(111)FLR388]; RLW2006(2)Raj1621; 2006(3)WLC345
M.C. Jain and; M.S. Gupta, Advs.
R.S. Chauhan, J.1. The State of Rajasthan has challenged the judgment dated 13.8.1996, whereby the learned Single Judge has directed the State to give emergent temporary appointment to the Respondent on the post of Revenue Inspector...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of India Vs. Spintex Tubes and Constructions Ltd. and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-10-1993
SICA
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446, 456 and 529A; State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 46B; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985
[1995]82CompCas290(Raj); 1993(2)WLC236
G.S. Bapna, Adv.
I.S. Israni, J.1. An application dated May 5, 1992, under Section 446 read with Section 456 of the Companies Act, 1956, and Rules 6 and 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, read with Section 151...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »