Advanced Search Results
Dasappa Vs. Southern Railways
Karnataka
Jun-27-1983
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 136, 226, 409 and 411(2)
ILR1986KAR301
G. Dayananda, Adv.
ORDERRama Jois, J.1. In this Writ petition, in which an ex railway servant, has questioned the legality of the order dated 21-12-1981 (Annexure-D) made by the General Manager, Southern Railway, dismissing the appeal of the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAlfred J. Peries Vs. the State of Mysore and ors.
Karnataka
Apr-14-1967
Criminal
Prison Act, 1894 - Sections 59; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 53, 53A, 109, 120B and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 401 and 491; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1967Mys181; 1967CriLJ1353; (1967)1MysLJ634
G. Dayanand, Adv. for ;State Public Prosecutor
Chandrashekhar, J.1. The petitioner is a convict serving his sentence of imprisonment in the Central Jail, Bangalore. In this petition under Article 220 of the Constitution read with Section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.F. Ansari Vs. Union of India and ors.
Karnataka
Jan-10-1983
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Articles 163, 226, 309, 310, 311 and 311(2); ;Railway Servants Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1968 - Rules 9 to 13, 14, 22 148(3) and 149(3)
(1983)IILLJ330Kant
ORDER1. In this batch of eight writ petitions filed by ex-Railway servants questioning the legality of the orders by which penalty of dismissal from service was imposed against them, after dispensing with the enquiry, in exercise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Divisional Superintendent (Works), Southern Railway, Mysore Vs. St ...
Karnataka
Jan-02-1981
Sales Tax
Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 12(3) and 13(3)
[1981]48STC33(Kar)
M.R. Vanaja, High Court Government Pleader
Rama Jois, J.1. In these two writ petitions presented by the District Controller of Stores, Southern Railway, Mysore, the following question of law arises for consideration : 'Whether sales tax is leviable on the sale proceeds...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri K. Krishnamurthy Vs. the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and o ...
Karnataka
Sep-05-2008
Constitution
Karnataka Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe and Other Backward Classes (Reservation in Appointment etc.) Act, 1990 - Sections 13(1); Evidence Act - Sections 74 and 76; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1956; Karnataka Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Reservation of Appointment Second (Amendment) Act, 2004 - Sections 4D; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 16(3), 73, 246(1), 246(2) and 248
ILR2008KAR4716
A. Padmanabhan, CGSC for R1 and R2, ;Kashinath, J.D. for Adv. for ;Jagadish, Adv. for R3 to R13
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Writ petition by a person who had obtained employment meant for persons belonging to scheduled caste community by joining in the services of the Indian Telephone Industries Ltd., Dooravaninagar, Bangalore, way back...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManjulatha Vs. Dr. M.L. Narasimham
Karnataka
Jan-17-1985
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 23(3), 24 and 24(5)
ILR1985KAR1413; 1985(1)KarLJ380
G. Dayananda, Adv.
ORDERMurlidher Rao, J.1. This is a petition filed by the wife for transferring M. C. No. 259 of 1981, pending in the court of the City Civil Judge, Bangalore, to be tried along with O. P....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNanjundaradhya Vs. Enquiry Authority
Karnataka
Feb-07-1985
Service
Railway Establishment Code - Rule 153; Railway Discipline and Appeal Rules - Rule 6
ILR1985KAR3331
G. Dayananda, Adv.
ORDERRama Jois, J.1. The petitioner, a technician in the Railway Department of the Central Government, has questioned the legality of the order by which he was removed from service which order was confirmed in appeal but...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.H. Kelkar and ors. Vs. Mandakini Bai and anr.
Karnataka
Jul-31-1969
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1 - Order 33, Rule 1
AIR1970Kant163; AIR1970Mys163; ILR1969KAR819; (1969)2MysLJ228
G. Dayananda, Adv.
ORDER1. The suit was originally sought to be instituted in forma pauperis with five prayers. On refusal of leave to do so, the plaintiff struck off four reliefs from the plaint, paid Court fee on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRangaswamy and ors. Vs. Smt. Nagamma
Karnataka
Mar-02-1972
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9(2), 12, 12(1) and 12(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 112
AIR1973Kant178; AIR1973Mys178; (1972)2MysLJ256
G. Dayananda, Adv.
Venkataramiah, J.1. The respondents in M. C. No. 14 of 1968 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge, Mysore, are the appellants in this case. The said case was filed by the respondent in this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVerkey and Co. Vs. Regional Labour Commissioner
Karnataka
Mar-11-1985
Labour and Industrial
Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 21; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Rules, 1971 - Rule 25(2)
ILR1985KAR3359
K. Shivashankar Bhat, Central Government Standing Counsel for Respondents-1 and 2; ;G. Dayananda, Adv. for Respondent-3; ;N. Santhosh Hegde, Adv. General
ORDERRama Jois, J.1. In this Writ Petition presented by T.K.Verkey & Co., the 1st petitioner ('the Company' for short) and its Manager, the 2nd petitioner, challenging the validity of the order made by the Regional Labour...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »