Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mathubhai C. Patel.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-30-1997
Direct Taxation
[1999]238ITR403(SC)
These appeals by the Revenue are directed against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court dated August 27, 1980, in Income-tax Reference No, 2.51 of 1975 : [1982]133ITR303(Guj) : [1982]133ITR303(Guj) . The High Court has granted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ms. Monica Oswal,
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-15-2003
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3) and 260A
(2004)190CTR(P& H)56; [2004]267ITR308(P& H)
G.C. Sharma,; Atul Gandhi and; Suvneet Sharma, Advs.
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. There are two gifts of $ 200,000 each by two donors who are not related to the assessee in favour of the assessee's two daughters, through two banks drafts bearing consecutive numbers,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Modi Industries Ltd.
Delhi
Apr-18-1994
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 38 and 38(1)
1994IIAD(Delhi)396; (1994)116CTR(Del)353; 54(1994)DLT446; 1994(29)DRJ225; [1994]210ITR1(Delhi)
G.C. Sharma, Adv.
D. K. Jain, J. 1. In these two references, at the instance of the Revenue, on a direction issued by the Allahabad High Court under section section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, 'the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smithkline Beecham Consumer Brands Ltd. ...
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-07-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32, 35, 35(1), 35B(1), 36, 40, 40A(5), 41, 41(1) and 256
[1997]226ITR764(P& H)
G.C. Sharma, Sr. Adv.,; S.S. Mahajan and; Aparna Mahajan
N.K. Agrawal, J.1. These three petitions (Income-tax Cases Nos. 31, 32 and 33 of 1995) filed by the Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act'), relate to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Jagadhri Electric Supply and Industrial ...
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-17-1981
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184(7), 253(1), 263 and 263(1); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 24; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 30(5)
(1981)25CTR(P& H)94; [1983]140ITR490(P& H)
G.C. Sharma,; Ashok Bhan,; D.K. Gupta and;
J.V. Gupta, J.1. These two references Nos. 66 and 67 of 1975, arising out of an order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (hereinafter called ' the Tribunal'), dated September 3, 1974, have been made...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax (Central) Vs. Sanitary Improvement and Tile ...
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-25-1980
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(45), 3(1), 139(1), 271(1) and 274
[1981]129ITR37(P& H)
G.C. Sharma and; S.S. Mahajan, Advs.
M.R. Sharma. J. 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar, has referred the following question of law to us for our opinion: ' Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. R.N. Oswal Hosiery Factory
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-24-1986
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35B and 35B(1); Finance Act, 1978
(1987)59CTR(P& H)51; [1987]165ITR662(P& H)
G.C. Sharma,; D.K. Gupta and; S.S. Mahajan, Advs.
1. The assessee is a registered firm and derives its income from the manufacture of hosiery goods and their sale to U.S.S.R. through its purchase agency, M/s. Rozno Exports. It claimed weighted deduction under Section 35B...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax, Amritsar Vs. Shiv Prakash Janak Raj and Co ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-30-1996
Direct Taxation
1996VIIAD(SC)625; (1996)136CTR(SC)421; [1996]222ITR583(SC); JT1996(8)SC603; 1996(7)SCALE368; (1996)11SCC530; [1996]Supp7SCR81
G.C. Sharma, ; S. Rajappa and ; K.B. Rohtagi, Advs.
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. These appeals are preferred by the Revenue against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court answering the questions, referred at the instance of the assessee, in favour of the assessee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agricultural Marketing Produce Comcommi ...
Delhi
Dec-18-2000
Direct Taxation
Delhi Agricultural Market Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 5, 5(7), (9), (10) and (14), 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 39 and 65; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20) and 256(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) General Rules, 1978; Constitution of India - Article 239; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Delhi Development Act - Sections 3, 4, 5, 30, 37, 52, 56 and 59; Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963
(2001)165CTR(Del)298; [2001]250ITR369(Delhi)
G.C. Sharma, ; Avnish Ahlawat and ; J. Kathuria, Advs.
Arijit Pasayat, C.J.1. All these references under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), involve identical questions, refer red at the instance of the Revenue, by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ess Ess Kay Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Punjab and Haryana
Jun-01-1981
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147
(1981)25CTR(P& H)88; [1982]137ITR446(P& H)
G.C. Sharma and; S.S. Mahajan, Advs.
S.P. Goyal, J.1. The assessee is a private limited firm engaged in the manufacture and sale of electrical goods, such as switches and plugs. It appointed on April 1, 1965, M/s. Kay Engineering Sales Corporation, as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »