Advanced Search Results

The Mumbai Kamgar Sabha, Bombay Vs. Abdulbhai Faizullabhai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10A, 10(1), 18 and 19(3); Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 1(3), 2(21), 17, 32, 34, 35, 36(1) and 36(4); Payment of Wages Act - Sections 15(2); Factories Act; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 39, 43 and 226; Bonus (Amendment) Ordinance, 1975; Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Scheme Act, 1948

Reported in : AIR1976SC1455; (1976)IILLJ186SC; (1976)3SCC832; [1976]3SCR591

Advocate for Respondent : G.B. Pai, ; Shri Narain, ; O.C. Mathur, ;

V.R. Krishna Iyer, J.1. A narration of the skeletal facts, sufficient to get a hang of the four legal issues debated at the bar in this appeal, by special leave, will help direct the discussion, along...

Workmen of the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (Refining Division) B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 19(2); Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1984SC356; (1984)ILLJ35SC; 1983(2)SCALE736; (1983)4SCC470; [1984]1SCR251; 1984(1)SLJ198(SC); 1984(16)LC8(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : G.B. Pai, ; O.C. Mathur, ; S. Kumaran, ;

O.Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. The workmen of the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Bombay raised an Industrial dispute with regard to the retirement age of the clerical staff employed in the Refinery Division of the Bharat Petroleum Corporation...

Mico Employees' Association Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11(1), 12, 12(2), 18(3), 20(1), 20(2) and 33; Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 - Rules 9, 10 and 10A

Reported in : ILR1986KAR3474; (1987)ILLJ300Kant

Advocate for Respondent : B.S. Keshava Iyengar, Advocate General for R-1 to 3, ;G.B. Pai and ;K. Kasturi, Advs. for R-4 and ;D. Leelakrishnan, Adv. for R-5

ORDERBopanna, J.1. The validity of the settlement under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the Act) read with Rule 59 of the Rules framed by the State Government under the Act entered...

Workmen of Kettlewell Bullen and Co. Ltd. Vs. Kettlewell Bullen and Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 17 and 34(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1994SC1550; 1995(1)BLJR119; (1994)2CALLT19(SC); [1994(68)FLR302]; (1995)ILLJ1201SC; 1994(1)SCALE30; (1994)2SCC357a; [1994]1SCR22; 1994(3)SLJ194(SC); 1994(2)LC184(SC); (1; 1994 (2) SCC 357

Advocate for Respondent : G.B. Pai and ; Suman Khaitan, Advs.

ORDERS.C. Agrawal, J.1. This appeal by the workmen of Kettewell Bullen & Company Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the workmen') involves the question whether the workmen are entitled to Customary bonus at the rate of 10.5...

Indian Oxygen Ltd. Vs. Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Bonus Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 5 and 6

Reported in : AIR1972SC471; [1972(24)FLR184]; (1972)ILLJ627SC; (1972)4SCC578; [1972]2SCR816

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Chaudhuri, Adv. For the respondent No. 3 In C.A. No. 415 of 1967 and ; G.B. Pai and ;

C.A. Vaidialingam, J.1. All these appeals, by special leave, are directed against the Award dated January 20, 1967 of the National Industrial Calcutta in Reference No. NIT-1 of 1966. Civil Appeal No. 415 of 1967 is...

Deo Sunder Jha and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10(1)

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)194; 86(2000)DLT616; 2000(54)DRJ6; [2000(87)FLR371]; (2000)IILLJ951Del

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. G.B. Pai Sr. Adv., ; Mr. Lalit Bhasin, ; Ms. Ratna Dwiv

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. This batch of writ petitions raise common question of law and arises from almost identical facts and thereforee can be disposed of by one common judgment. In all these writ petitions, interpretation of...

Bhuwalka Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules - Rules 2, 3, 96ZO, 96ZO(3) and 96ZP; Central Excise Act - Sections 3A and 3A(2)

Reported in : 2003(89)ECC824; 2003(159)ELT147(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. G.B. Pai

ORDERR. Gururajan, J.1. The petitioner a steel industry is seeking a writ from this Court to strike down Rule 3 of the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules (for short the 'Rules') in terms of a...

The Workmen of H.M.T. and anr. Vs. the Presiding Officer, National Tri ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 3, 5, 10, 16 and 16(1)

Reported in : AIR1973SC2300; [1973(26)FLR311]; (1973)IILLJ100SC; (1973)2SCC277; [1973]3SCR850

Advocate for Respondent : G.B. Pai, ; P.P. Bopanna, ; K.N. Bhatta and ;

C.A. Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal by special leave by the workmen of the Hindustan Machine Tools, Unit, IV, Kalamassery, is directed against the award dated April 16, 1969, of the National Tribunal at Calcutta in Reference...

Workmen of Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking Vs. the Management of Del ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Electricity (Supply) Act - Sections 7 and 79; Electricity (Supply) Regulation - Regulation 17

Reported in : AIR1973SC365; (1972)IILLJ130SC; (1974)3SCC108

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. G. B. Pai

C.A. Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, is against the Award dated October 24. 1967 of the Additional Industrial Tribunal. Delhi, in I. D. No. 34 of 1966.2. Two disputes between the Workmen of the...

C.W.S. (India) Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1994]208ITR649(SC); JT1994(3)SC116; 1994(1)SCALE840; 1994Supp(2)SCC296; [1994]2SCR247

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. G.B. Pai

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.Civil Appeal Nos. 493-98 of 19841. A common question arises in this hatch of appeals. It pertains to the interpretation of Section, 40(a)(v) as well as Section 40A(5) of the Income Tax Act....