Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: f s nariman and · Page 1 of about 349 results (0.225 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 11 2011

Apm Terminals B.V. Vs Union of India and anr ,

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-11-2011

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act; Major Port Trusts Act - Sections 111, 42(3); Indian Ports Act; Electricity Act - Sections 178, 79(1)(j)

1. Leave granted in SLP(C)No.13893 of 2010, which is being heard along with Transferred Case (Civil) Nos.36-37 of 2010. While the appeal has been filed by APM Terminals B.V. against the decision of the High Court,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2009

In Re: Destruction of Public and Private Properties Vs. State of A.P. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-16-2009

Subject : PropertyCriminal

Acts : PDPP Act - Sections 5 ;Evidence Act; Agricultural Marketing Act, 1958; Police Act, 1861; Essential Commodities Act; Excise and Customs Act; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act; Press Council Act, 1978; Cinematography Act, 1952; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 21, 32 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 437

Reported in : AIR2009SC2266; 2009(57)BLJR2292; 2009CriLJ2807; JT2009(6)SC1; (2009)5SCC212; 2009(5)LC2478(SC):2009AIRSCW3000

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Taking a serious note of various instances where there was large scale destruction of public and private properties in the name of agitations, bandhs, hartals and the like, suo motu proceedings were initiated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2006

Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-29-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 17 18, 21, 23, 27, 28, 28(3), 29, 29(2), 30(1), 33, 48, 49, 78 and 79; Companies Act, 1956; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules; Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1) and 17(2); Copyright Act - Sections 63; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 417, 419, 420 and 486; ;Indian Partnership Act

Reported in : AIR2006SC3304; 2006(6)ALD36(SC); 2007(1)ALLMR(SC)402; (2007)1GLR594; JT2006(8)SC393; 2006(33)PTC281(SC); 2006(8)SCALE631; (2006)8SCC726

Advocate for Respondent : F.S. Nariman, ; Abhishek M. Singhvi and ; Mihir Thakore,

ORDER ON THE APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTION 9. By a judgment and order dated 17.03.2000, the learned Trial Judge opined that the plaintiff company was the owner of the trademark. It was further held that the defendants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 16 2001

Lata Wadhwa and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2001

Subject : ConstitutionLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 32; Factories Rules; Factories Act; Motor Vehicles Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 144

Reported in : II(2001)ACC316; 2001ACJ1735; AIR2001SC3218; 2003(2)AWC1486(SC); [2001(91)FLR705]; JT2001(6)SC431; (2001)IILLJ1559SC; 2001(5)SCALE286; (2001)8SCC197; (2001)3UPLBEC2268

Advocate for Respondent : F.S. Nariman and ; V.P. Singh, Sr. Advs., ; Ravinder Narain,

Pattanaik, J.1. This writ petition was filed by the three petitioners, invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 21 and 32 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus or any...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2006

Kamal Kumar Dutta and anr. Vs. Ruby General Hospital Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-11-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10F, 53, 81(1A) 189, 193, 283(1), 397, 397(1), 398, 398(1), 399, 402 and 483; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 19(1); Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 4, 4(1), 100A, 104(1) and 104(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 100A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 100A; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1991

Reported in : [2006]134CompCas678(SC); (2006)5CompLJ511(SC); JT2006(7)SC333; 2006(7)SCALE668; [2006]70SCL222(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : F.S. Nariman (N.P.), ; T.R. Andhyarujina and ; S.N. Mookher

A.K. Mathur, J.1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against the order dated 31.3.2005 passed by learned Company Judge, Calcutta High Court in APO No. 746 of 1999 and APO No. 759 of 1999 whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 1996

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. M.P.J. Builders and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-09-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 52(1), 180-A, 181-A and 183-A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996VIAD(SC)102; AIR1996SC2645; (1990)3CompLJ362(SC); JT1996(7)SC123; 1996(5)SCALE713; (1996)5SCC438; [1996]Supp4SCR512

Advocate for Respondent : F.S. Nariman, ; S. Ganesh, ; P.H. Parekh, ;

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. The dispute relates to the building sanction of House No. 2, Sholapur Bazar Road, Pune, which falls within the area of Pune Cantonment governed by the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1991

The Workmen Represented by Secretary Vs. the Management of Reptakos Br ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-31-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1992SC504; [1991(63)FLR928]; JT1991(4)SC243; 1992LabIC289; (1992)ILLJ340SC; (1992)2MLJ16(SC); 1991(2)SCALE940; (1992)1SCC290; [1991]Supp2SCR129; 1992(1)SLJ34(SC); 1992(1

Advocate for Respondent : F.S. Nariman, ; R.F. Nariman, ; T.S. Gopalan, ;

ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. Special leave granted.2. The Reptakos Brett & Co. Ltd. (hereinafter called the 'Company') is engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical and dietetic speciality products and is having three units, two at Bombay and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2007

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Nusli Neville Wadia and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-13-2007

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(2), 5, 7, 7(3), 9, 15, 18 and 101; Companies Act, 1950; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; Evidence Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1958; Government Public Premises Eviction Act, 1950; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Rules, 1971 - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 14; Rent Act; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses Rates (Control) Act, 1947; ;Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

Reported in : AIR2008SC876; 2008(56)BLJR560; 2008(1)BomCR550; JT2008(1)SC31; 2007(14)SCALE556; (2008)3SCC279; 2008AIRSCW208; AIR2008SC876; 2008(3)SCC279; 2008(1)LH(SC)128; 2008(2)ICC147

Advocate for Respondent : F.S. Nariman, ; Anil Divan and ; Shyam Divan, Sr. Advs., ;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.Introduction2. Who should begin to lead evidence in a proceeding under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (in short 'the Act') is the question involved in these appeals. Background...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2003

Mysore Cements Ltd. Vs. Svedala Barmac Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-12-2003

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : UNCITRAL Conciliation Rule; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 30, 31, 34, 36, 73, 73(2), 73(3), 73(4), 74, 76 and 77; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Evidence Act, 1872

Reported in : AIR2003SC3493; 2003(1)ARBLR651(SC); 2003(4)AWC2727(SC); JT2003(5)SC103; (2003)3MLJ76(SC); 2003(3)SCALE201; (2003)10SCC375; [2003]2SCR1028; 2003(2)LC838(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : F.S. Nariman, Sr. Adv., ; Anil Malhotra, ; Ravi Bishoni,

Shivaraj V. Patil, J.1. Leave granted.2. The question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether a Letter of Comfort furnished on the same day of a Settlement arrived at during conciliation signed by both...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2005

Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa and Chennai Vs. M.R.F. Ltd., Chenn ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-25-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1994 - Sections 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 11; Interpretation Rules - Rule (1)

Reported in : 2005(98)ECC417; 2005(180)ELT145(SC); JT2005(1)SC431; (2005)2SCC733

Advocate for Respondent : F.S. Nariman and ; Joseph Vellapally, Sr. Advs., ; S. Ignatius

S.H. Kapadia, J. 1. The main question which arises for determination in this set of Civil Appeals is - whether Dipped Nylon Tyre Cord Warp Sheet (hereinafter referred to as the 'Dipped Tyre Cord Fabric') is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial