Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: e manohar and · Page 1 of about 317 results (0.082 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 28 2003

Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. A.P. Lokayukta and Upa-lokayukta and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-28-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD732; 2003(4)ALT68

Advocate for Respondent : Adv.-General for Respondent No. 1 in WA No. 3025 of 2003 and ;E. Manohar and M.V.S. Suresh Kumar for Respondent No. 2 in WP No. 3025 of 2003

Devinder Gupta, C.J.1. Government of Andhra Pradesh has filed this appeal challenging the interim order dated 19.2.2003 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in a suo motu taken up Writ Petition No. 3025 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 2001

Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Tribes Employees Association Vs. Aditya Prata ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-02-2001

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 15(4), 16(1), 16(4), 21, 32, 121, 124(4), 136, 141, 226, 233 to 237, 309, 335, 341, 342, 342(1), 342(2), 366(24) and 366(25); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9, 11, 80, 100(4), 100(5), 151, 152 and 153; Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Order (Amendment) Act, 1976; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 40, 41, 42 and 44; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 - Sections 5 and 11; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes Order, 1950; Suits Valuation Act - Sections 11; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 21; Malaya Rubber Regulati

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD582; 2001(6)ALT433

Advocate for Respondent : E. Manohar for T. Lakshminarayana, Adv., ;Government Pleader for SW, ;C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, SC for HC and ;C.V. Ramulu, SC for CG

V.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner is a statewide Association. It is registered and established under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 with the object of safeguarding the rights of the persons belonging to Scheduled Tribes and espouse...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2002

Osmania University Teachers Association (Outa) Represented by Its Gene ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-09-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956; University Grants Commission Regulations, 2000 - Sections 14 and 26; Andhra Pradesh Universities Act, 1991 - Sections 43A; Andhra Pradesh Universities (Amendment) Act, 2001

Reported in : 2002(4)ALT682

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Ramulu, Standing Counsel for the Central Government, ;Govt. Pleader for Higher Education, ;E. Manohar, Senior Counsel for K. Ramakantha Reddy, ;N. Praveen Kumar and ;Gummala Vijaya Kumar, Advs.

ORDERB. Sudershan Reddy, J. 1. This batch of writ petitions may be disposed of by a common order since the issues that require resolution, more or less, are the same in all of them. 2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 16 2002

All India Council for Technical Education, Indira Gandhi Sports Comple ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-16-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Live Stock) Markets Act, 1966; University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 12 and 12A; Andhra Pradesh University Act, 1991 - Sections 19(16); All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 23(1); Madras University Act; Bharathidasan University Act, 1981

Reported in : 2002(5)ALT722

Advocate for Respondent : K. Subrahmanya Reddy, Adv. for ;K. Ramakanth Reddy, Adv., ;E. Manohar, Adv. for ;M.S. Prasad, G.P. for Higher Education

AR. Lakshmanan, C.J. 1. These Writ Appeals arising out of a common Judgment of the learned single Judge in W.P.Nos. 10435 and 18687 of 2001 were heard together and are being disposed of by this common...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 1996

Tadi Tata Rao Vs. Govt. of A.P., Rep. by Its Secretary, Transport and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-23-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Canals and Public Ferries Act, 1890 - Sections 12; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Canals and Public Ferries Rules - Rules 1, 2 and 9

Reported in : 1997(1)ALT565

Advocate for Respondent : Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, ;E. Manohar, Sr. Counsel for ;E.V.S.S. Acharyulu, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, J.1. This Writ Petition has been filed questioning G.O.Rt.No. 1206, Transport, Roads and Buildings (R.IV) Department, dated 6-12-1994 as being arbitrary and viola rive of the statutory rules framed under the Andhra Pradesh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 2004

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Secretary, Revenue (Aisn) Dep ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-17-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(5)ALD748; 2004(6)ALT126

Advocate for Respondent : E. Manohar and ;K. Gopala Krishna Murthy, Advs.

B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. The dispute in the instant case centres around the proposal to alienate huge extent of about Acs.400-00 of land situated at Nerellavalasa Village within the Urban Agglomeration of Visakhapatnam, one of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1997

D.S. Krishna Vs. Digvijay Industries

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-01-1997

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2) and 32; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108

Reported in : 1997(3)ALT756

Advocate for Respondent : E. Manohar, Adv.

ORDERP. Venkatarama Reddi, J.1. This Revision Petition is filed under Section 22 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act by the tenant. The order of the appellate Court (Chief Judge, City Small Causes...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2003

Gvk Industries Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-02-2003

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD676

Advocate for Respondent : T. Suryakaran Reddy, SC to Central Government for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, E. Manohar and Kakara Venkata Rao, for Respondent No. 4, ;Additional Adv. General for Respondent No. 5, ;Milind G. Gokhale, Ad

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The writ petition is filed praying this Court to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent Nos. to 4 in not allocating additional quantity of gas of 0.30 MCMD (Million...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2004

N.R. Srinivas Vs. Madduri Mallareddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-25-2004

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35 and 102; Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 - Sections 5A; Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books (Amendment) Act, 1984; Property Laws; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 208; Record of Rights Act - Sections 2(4)

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD268

Advocate for Respondent : E. Manohar, Adv.

D.S.R. Varma, J.1. Heard Sri Subrahmanya Reddy, the learned Senior Counsel for the appellants, and Sri E. Manohar, the learned Senior Counsel for the respondents.2. All these three appeals are directed against the common judgment and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2002

Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. V. Tulsiram and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-11-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) (Abolition of Jagirs) Regulations, 1358F - Sections 5(1)

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD509

Advocate for Respondent : E. Manohar, Adv. for ;C. Venkat Reddy, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6

S.R. Nayak, J.1. The substantial question that arises in this appeal for our consideration and decision is whether the subject land could constitute 'jagir' within the meaning of that term as defined in Clause (f) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial