Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: dr d c vohra · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.099 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 14 2007

Sh. Pramod Kumar Sheel S/O Sh. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-14-2007

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. By this O.A., the applicant has impugned the orders dated 31.05.2006 (Annexure/A-1) and 27.04.2006 (Annexure/A-2) alleging that the same are unconstitutional and arbitrary, being in total violation of Articles 14, 16 and 31(2) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2001

P.S. Ochani Vs. World Health Organisation and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-04-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : United Nations Privileges and Immunities Act, 1947 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 - Schedule - Articles I, 2, 3 and 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 86, 86(1) and 86(6)

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT680; 2002(61)DRJ672

J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. Through this application, defendants have sought dismissal of the suit as being barred by law.2. Defendant No. 1 is a Specialised Agency of the United Nations within the meaning of the Charter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2007

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Kanwaljit S. Sareen,

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-09-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195, 195(1) and 340; Constitution of India - Article 215

Reported in : II(2007)BC362; 2007CriLJ2339; 138(2007)DLT682; 2007(94)DRJ723

Advocate for Respondent : Shankar Anand, Adv. in S. No. 621/99 and Crl.M. Nos. 610 and 712/2003 in S. Nos. 621 and 1357/99

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. The present contempt proceedings have been initiated by the Court on its own motion, taking cognizance of the abuse of the legal process. Two recovery suits were filed on loan agreements by respondent/contemnor...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 08 2011

Union of India Vs. Hari Shankar

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-08-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 14; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Dr.D.C.Vohra, Adv.

1. The petitioner, Union of India through the Foreign Secretary, Government of India, has challenged the order dated 23rd December, 2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.267/2008 titled as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial