Advanced Search Results

R. Varadhappan Vs. V. Palanivel and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1981)4SCC244

D.A. Desai and; R.B. Misra, JJ.1. We have heard learned counsel Dr Chitale for the appellant and learned counsel Dr Natesan for the respondents.2. The matter does not admit of a long argument or a delayed...

P.N. Dua Vs. P. Shiv Shanker and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 15(1) and 15(3); Supreme Court Contempt of Court Rules, 1975 - Rules 3, 4, 5 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 31, 76, 129, 143(2), 145 and 215; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1988SC1208; 1989(1)BLJR31; 1988CriLJ1745; JT1988(2)SC102; 1988(1)SCALE728; (1988)3SCC167; [1988]3SCR547

Advocate for Respondent : B. Datta, Additional Solicitor General, ; Y.S. Chitale, ; A.K. Gan

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 260 Of 1988.Under Section 15(1)(a) and (b) of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971 read with its explanation (1) and Rule (3)(a), (b) and (c) of Contempt of Supreme Court...

Saba B Vs. the State of Telangana, Rep. by Its Chie

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : M/s. BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES Counsel

THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.30683 of 2014 21-11-2014 Saba Begum PETITIONER The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, General Administration (Law & Order) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.RESPONDENTS Counsel...

Prem Shankar Shukla Vs. Delhi Administration

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 46 and 49; Prisoners (Attendance in Courts) Act, 1955 - Sections 9(2); Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rules 22, 26, 26.21A and 26.22 ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 9(2), 75, 148, 220 and 226

Reported in : AIR1980SC1535; 1980CriLJ930; (1980)3SCC526; [1980]3SCR855

V.R. Krishna Iyer, J.1. When they arrested my neighbour I did not protest. When they arrested the men and women in the opposite house I did not protest. And when they finally came for me, there...

Govt. of Manipur Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(6), 73, 246, 246(1) and (3), and 298; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294A; Bombay Lotteries (Control and Tax) and Prize Competition (Tax) Act, 1958 - Sections 3 and 32;

Reported in : AIR1997P& H28

Advocate for Respondent : S. Saron, Addl, A.G. (P)

ORDERAshok Bhan, J.1. This judgment dispose of Civil Writ Petitions 10155 of 1995 (The Government of Manipur v. The State of Punjab), 10255 of 1995 (The Government of Assam v. The Slate of Punjab), 10254 of...

Hardwari Lal Vs. G.D. Tapase and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharshi Dayanand University Act, 1975 - Sections 9; ;Maharshi Dayanand University (Amendment) Act, 1980; Rohtak University Act, 1975; University Grants Commission Act - Sections 12-A; Osmania University Act of 1959; Osmania University (Amendment) Act, 1966

Reported in : AIR1982P& H439

Advocate for Respondent : Dr. Chitale

Prem Chand Jain, J.1. Shri Hardwari Lal has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Calling in question the legality and constitutional validity of Haryana Ordinance No. 5 of 1980 (hereinafter called...

Rakesh Kaushik Vs. B.L. Vig, Superintendent, Central Jail, New Delhi a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act - Sections 61

Reported in : AIR1981SC1767; 1981CriLJ1438; 1980Supp(1)SCC183; 1980(Supp)SCC183; [1981]3SCR929

V.R. Krishna Iyer J.1. Is a prison term in Tihar Jail a post-graduate course in crime? Such is the poignant issue that emerges from the facts of this case.2. 'The fundamental human right is not to...

Rakesh Ranjan Verma and Others Vs. State of Biha and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 15, 78-A and 79; Bihar State Electricity Board Junior Electrical Engineer (General) Rules, 1982 - Rule 7; Constitution of India - Article 16

Reported in : AIR1992SC1348; [1992(65)FLR411]; JT1992(4)SC155; 1992(1)SCALE817; 1992Supp(2)SCC343; [1992]2SCR516; 1992(2)SLJ201(SC); 1992(2)LC393(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Venugopal (N.P.), ; P.P. Tripathi and ; Pramod Swarup

ORDERKasliwal, J.1. Special leave granted.2. Appeal in SLP No. 3859 of 1991 arises out of the judgment of the Patna High Court dated 12.12.1990 in Writ Petition No. 7348 of 1989 and Appeal in SLP No....

Swamy Shraddananda @ Murali Manohar Mishra Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Special Marriage Act; Prisons Act - Sections 59; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act - Sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2); Prevention of Corruption Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 45, 53, 54, 55, 55A, 57, 65, 116, 119, 120B, 129, 201, 302, 364A and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 235(2), 354(3), 366, 367(5), 401, 432, 433, 433A and 434; Karnataka Prison Rules, 1974 - Rules 214, 215 and 814; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 72 and 161

Reported in : AIR2008SC3040; 2008(56)BLJR2507; 2008CriLJ3911; JT2008(8)SC27; 2008(10)SCALE669; 2008AIRSCW5110; (2008)2SCC(Cri)322; 2008(3)Crimes215; 2008(4)LH(SC)2705; 2008(6)AIRKarR21; (2008)13SCC767; [2008] 11 SCR 93

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay R. Hegde, ; Amit Chawla, ; S.J. Aristotle, ;

Aftab Alam, J. 1. Death to a cold blooded murderer or life, albeit subject to severe restrictions of personal liberty, is the vexed question that once again arises before this Court. A verdict of death would...

Philip John Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1985CriLJ397

P.D. Desai, C.J.1. Rule. To be heard today.2. The learned Advocate-General waives service of the Rule on behalf of the respondents.3. The petitioner is a prisoner undergoing sentence of imprisonment in the Model Central Jail at...