Advanced Search Results

idbi Ltd. Vs. the Official Liquidator.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company Law

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529A, 529, 456(2),132, 125, 529(1), 446, 537, 529A(1), 529A(1)(b), 529(1)(c), 446(2), 19(22), 124 ; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19, 19(22), 25, 28,17, 34, 29,30, 18, 34, 38 ;

Advocate for Respondent : Dr. Anjan De, Adv.

1. A Company, viz. Maharashtra Explosives Ltd. (Company under liquidation), incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, "the said Act"), having its registered office at Plot No.2, Villa Marina, 924, Nelson Square, Nagpur-13, was ordered...

Jolly Brothers Private Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Provi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Rent Control Act; Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1947 - Sections 13, 13(1), 13(2) and 13(3); Uttar Pradesh Cantonments (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1952 - Sections 14

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR736; 2007(4)BomCR171

Advocate for Respondent : Anoop Parihar, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1 and ;J.J. Chandurkar, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

A.B. Chaudhari, J.1. By the present writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the judgment and order dated 24.2.1995 in Revenue Appeal No. 4/71 (2)/94-95-Amravati, passed by the Additional Collector, Amravati, by which the Appellate Authority under...

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Vs. Prabhakar Nanaji Di ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This appeal has been preferred by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Nagpur, the acquiring body, challenging the judgment and order dated 22.12.2000, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chandrapur, in Land Acquisition Case...

Janardan Urkuda Waghmare Vs. Ratanlal Kashinath Gudekar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR800; 2007(6)BomCR584; 2007(5)MhLj536

Advocate for Respondent : Anjan De, Adv.

Chaudhari A.B., J.1. Rule. Heard forthwith by consent of parties. Heard Mr. A.C. Dharmadhikari, learned Counsel for petitioner and Dr. Anjan De, learned Counsel for respondent.2. Petitioner has challenged order dated 25.4.2007 passed by the Civil...

Amar Singh S/O Narendra Singh Bais Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3 and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 201, 302 and 304B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 330, 397, 439(2) and 482

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1538; I(2006)DMC572; 2006(1)MhLj430

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Fulzele, A.P.P.

K.J. Rohee, J.1. Heard finally by consent of parties.The applicant is one of the accused persons facing trial for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code...

Sharda Vs. Kavi Kalidas Shikshan Sanstha, Through Its President and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

1. This petition takes exception to the judgment and order dated 18.4.2001 passed by the School Tribunal, Nagpur, dismissing Appeal No.STN/243 of 1993 filed under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of...

Ganesh S/O. Mahadeorao Thawre Vs. Central Hindu Military Education Soc ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Act, 1977 - Sections 2(12); Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 9, 17, 22, 22A, 22(3) and 28; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 - Rule 36 and 36(2)

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR105; 2007(5)BomCR680; 2007(6)MhLj589

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Manohar, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;Rohit Deo, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

R.C. Chavan, J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and is heard by consent of the parties.2. Petitioner, Head Master of Bhonsla Military School, Nagpur, has challenged decision of respondent management to conduct an enquiry into...

Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Vs. Saurabh ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment:1. Heard Shri D.N. Kukday, the learned Advocate for the petitioner and Dr. Anjan De, the learned Advocate for the respondent No.1. The respondent No.2 is appellate authority, appearance on its behalf is waived.2. Rule....

Sashikala W/O Ghanshyam Gaikwad Vs. Moresh Eknath Jambhulkar and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 245

Reported in : 2004(4)MhLj1126

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Mathur, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;Ahirkar, A.P.P. FOR respondent No. 2

A.P. Lavande, J.1. This is an Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the original accused in Regular Criminal Case No. 393/93. The respondent No. 1 filed Criminal Case No. 393/93...