Advanced Search Results

Waman S/O Bhimrao Mendhe and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra Through P.S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 313 and 374; Evidence Act - Sections 9 and 27; Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR2410

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Doifode, APP

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Fifteen accused convicted by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Sessions Trial No. 233 of 2001 on 03.10.2002 of an offence under Section 302 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code...

Sau. Laxmi W/O Vijay Verma Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through the Se ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 5(3), 41, 41(2), 44, 48, 48(2) and 318; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 6(2); Maharashtra Municipalities Election Rules, 1966 - Rules 40 and 63; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Rules, 1956 - Rules 2A and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164 and 364; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(6)MhLj816

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Doifode, AGP for Respondents No. 1 to 3, ;R.S. Khojre, Adv. for Respondent No. 4, ;P.C. Marpakwar, Adv. for Respondent No. 5 and ;A.S. Kilor and ;S.S. Shingne, Advs. for Respondent No. 6

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Considering the nature of controversy, we have heard parties finally. Resignation letter dated 29/12/2008 submitted by present respondent No. 6 is found to be not signed by him in presence of respondent No....

Chandrakant Shikshan Sanstha Through Its Secretary, Shri P.M. Falke Vs ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 12, 25A, 25A(1), 25A(2), 26, 26(1), 27 and 41; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) (Amendment) Rules, 1987

Reported in : 2010(1)MhLj391

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Kukdey, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 4A and 4B and ;S.S. Doifode, AGP for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The present writ petition in fact challenges the common judgment dated 25.08.1997 delivered by the School Tribunal in Appeal Nos. 51 of 1996, 52 of 1996, 54 of 1996 and 58 of 1996....

Ramchandra Gopal Belekar and anr. Vs. Commissioner, Amravati Division

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 17 to 21, 27 and 45(2);

Reported in : 2005(3)MhLj546

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Doifode, AGP in W.P. No. 944 of 1993 and ;A.S. Sonare, AGP in W.P. No. 982 of 1993

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Both these writ petitions challenge the order dated 30-11-1992 passed by the Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati, in exercise of Revisional power under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act,...

Kawadu S/O Madhav Bansod Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18(1), 26(1), 53 and 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR651; 2004(4)BomCR495; 2004(1)MhLj980

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjay Doifode, AGP

S. G. Mahajan, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith by consent of the learned counsel for revision petitioner and the learned AGP for respondents.2. This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 30-12-2002 passed by Civil...

Ramesh S/O Bapurao Uplenchwar and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 12, 17, 21, 45 and 45(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(4)MhLj457

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Doifode, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Heard Shri Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioners and Shri Doifode, Assistant Government Pleader for respondents No. 1 and 2.2. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner...

Rashid Vs. the State of Maharashtra .

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 113A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 306 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : II(2002)DMC601

Advocate for Respondent : Doifode, A.P.P.

1. The appellant/original accused No.1(hereinafter referred to as the appellant) and oneMariyam Begum Shaikh Safi (original accused No.2) weretried by the learned 1st Ad-hoc Additional SessionsJudge, Wardha, in Sessions Trial No.151/1998 on thecharge of having committed...

Abdul Ghaffar S/O Shaikh Jafar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 7

Reported in : 2004(3)MhLj1143

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Doifode, APP

A.P. Lavande, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. The applicant is an accused in Criminal Case No. 14 of 1995 pending before the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur. He challenges the proceedings filed against...

Prakash M. Adhau Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 306, 478A and 498A

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2226; II(2006)DMC240

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Doifode, Addl. PP

R.C. Chavan, J.1. Appellant Prakash, who has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Akola for offence punishable under Section 498-A of the Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine...

Vineet S/O Dnyaneshwar Panchbhaiyye Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR816; 2008(2)BomCR564; 2007(4)MhLj177

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Doifode, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 and ;N.W. Sambre, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

R.C. Chavan, J.1. This petition by a graduate of Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, takes exception to the order passed on 17-10-2002 by respondent No. 3 - Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Scheduled Tribe Claims...