Advanced Search Results

Milan Kumar Das Vs. Sm. Purnasashi Dassi and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1974Cal380,(1975)1CompLJ30(Cal),79CWN9

Advocate for Respondent : Dipankar Ghosh, Adv. (for No. 1) and ;K.P. Basu and ;S.K. Saha Ray, Advs. (for No. 5)

M.M. Dutt, J.1. This suit has been referred to the Special Bench by our learned brother B. M. Datta, J., under Chapter V, Rule 2 of the Original Side Rules. The question which arose before the...

Navneet Kumar Didwania Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Port) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 49, 110(1), 111 and 124; ;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 68-72

Reported in : (2002)3CALLT601(HC),2003(86)ECC182,2002(145)ELT6(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Dipankar Ghosh, ;M.B. Sarkar and ;Bhaskar Sen, Advs.

Mahemmad Haheeb Shams Ansari, J.1. The case of the petitioner, in brief is as under:Petitioner is carrying on business in the name and style of Hanuman Trading Corporation as sole proprietor. He is an exporter and...

M/S. Murray and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Board of Wakfs and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226;; Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 11, 41, 58 and 58(2);; Bengal Wakf Act, 1934 - Sections 53 and 54;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13;; Bihar Administration of Evacuee Property Ordinance - Sections 5 and 6;; Influx from Pakistan (Control) Act, 1949;; Specific Relief Act - Section 9

Reported in : AIR1990Cal86

Advocate for Respondent : Dipankar Ghosh, ;C.N. Mukherjee, ;Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Miss. Shefali Sircar, ;B.C. Ghosh Roy, ;Miss. Sarda Parmer, ;Syed Mansur Habibullah and ;Miss. Gayatri Mukherjee, Advs.

ORDER1. This writ petition was moved by the petitioner No. 1 who is the Company and the petitioner No. 2 who is the Director of the petitioner company praying for-a) A writ in the nature of...

Bharat Hari Singhania (individual) Vs. Wealth-tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth-Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 7, 16(2) and 16(4); ;Wealth-Tax Rules, 1959 - Rule 2

Reported in : (2003)185CTR(Cal)659,[2002]257ITR80(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Dipankar Ghosh, Additional Solicitor-General

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. In this case, the petitioner has challenged the legality, validity and the vires of Rule 2 of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Rules'). The short facts are...

Rudolf A. Oetkar Vs. Mohammed Orri

Court : Kolkata

Subject : LimitationArbitration

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 3 - Schedule - Articles 113, 119 and 137; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 37 and 46; ;Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961

Reported in : 2005(1)CHN495

Advocate for Respondent : Dipankar Ghosh, Adv.

S.B. Sinha, A.C.J.1. The only question which arises for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the application for preferring an award is barred by limitation or not.2. The fact of the matter lies in...

Calcutta Loans Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Prakash Krishna Mitter

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Section 74(1) and 74(3)

Reported in : (1975)2CompLJ87(Cal),[1978]114ITR487(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Dipankar Ghosh and ;S.C. Ukil, Advs.;Jayanta Mitra, Adv.

S.K. Roy Chowdhury J.1. This is an application by the Union of India through the Assistant Controller, 'A' Ward, Estate Duty-cum-Income-tax Circle, Calcutta, for an order directing the Registrar, Original Side, to pay to the petitioner...

S.S.B. Projects Ltd. and ors. Vs. Chiradeep Bhattacharya and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 36 and 151 - Order 21, Rule 32 - Order 39, Rule 4; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Advocate for Respondent : Dipankar Ghosh, Adv. for Opposite Party No. 1 and; Aniruddha Chatterjee, Adv. for Opposite Party No.

Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.1. A question has cropped up in this revisional application as to whether an order granting permission to sell the vendor's interest in the property to his purchaser, if the vendor so wishes, is...

Smt. Usha Ghosh Vs. Rabindra Nath Das and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CivilCriminalProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(2), 47, 100, 107, 144, 151 - Order 21, Rules 11, 23(2 and 3), 24(3), 34(3), 35 and 97;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 107, 144, 144(2 and 5) and 397;; Calcutta High Court - Rule 208;; Civil Rules and Orders - Rule 208;; Constitution of India - Article 227 and 300A

Reported in : AIR1993Cal128,95CWN758

Advocate for Respondent : Dipankar Ghosh, ;Mukul Prakash Banerjee, ;Koushik Roy, Pranab Chaki, ;A.N. Banerjee and ;Sankar Mukherjee, Advs.

ORDERBhagabati Prosad Banerjee, J.1. This is an application for restoration of possession filed by the defendant/appellant before this Court. This second appeal was admitted by this court on 22nd March 1991 and immediately after the admission...

Tanvar Eqbal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 133A and 133V(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Defence of India Act, 1962 - Section 2

Reported in : AIR1982Cal542

Advocate for Respondent : D.N. Das, ;B.S. Bagchi, ;Jamini Kumar Banerjee and ;Biswanath Chakraborty, Advs. (for Nos. 5 to 7), ;Dipankar Ghosh, ;Ajit Kumar Panja, ;Sibaji Sen and ;Debaprasad Bhattacharyya, Advs. (for Nos. 8, 9

ORDERP.C. Borooah, J.1. The petitioners, who are eleven in number, claim to be the legal heirs and representatives of one Sheikh Gholam Rasul Qais who died intestate on the 17th Jan., 1977. The said Sheikh Gholarn...

Manas Sarkar and ors. Vs. University of Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2000Cal251

Advocate for Respondent : Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, ;Jayanta Kumar Biswas and ;Dipankar Dutta, Advs.

ORDERAmitava Lala, J.1. There are 5 writ petitions altogether. All the 5 writ petitions are meant for the purpose of granting relief in favour of the petitioners in the nature of regularisation of their candidature as...