Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: dipak shome · Page 1 of about 26 results (0.050 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 13 1983

Krishna Kumar Damani Vs. RamnaraIn Agarwal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-13-1983

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 24; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 13, 20, 24(1), 24(2) and 24(5); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR1984Cal162

Advocate for Respondent : Dipak Shome, Adv. (for No. 1)

ORDERMonjula Bose, J.1. This application under Clause 13 of the Letters Patent, 1865 and Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeks, inter alia, withdrawal of Title Suit No. 60 of 1982 (Shri R....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2007

Cesc Ltd. and anr. Vs. Income-tax Officer (Tds) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-03-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(7A), 120(1), 120(2), 131, 131(1), 131(3) and 206; ;Limitation Act - Section 14; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : (2007)211CTR(Cal)343

Advocate for Respondent : Dipak Shome and ;Ramesh Kr. Chowdhary, Advs.

1. The appellant is an assessee under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant employs several persons in employment. Under Section 206 of the said Act of 1961 the appellant is bound to deduct tax at source...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2005

Jiwanram Sheoduttrai Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-02-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 18 - Schedule - Articles 18, 112 and 137; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 41; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 34; ;Arbitration and Concilliation Act, 1996

Reported in : (2005)199CTR(Cal)98,[2005]279ITR512(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Dipak Shome and ;Ranjan Sinha, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The question :The question involved in this appeal is :'Whether, on a true and proper construction of the contract with the Indian Railways and their letters dt. 3rd May, 1986, and 15th April,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 16 2000

Jaymac Lasetron (P.) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-16-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 281 - Schedule - Rules 2 and 11; ;Tansfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 53

Reported in : (2000)164CTR(Cal)366,[2000]245ITR734(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : D. Shome, Adv.

Amitava Lala, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner, virtually, wanted withdrawal, recalling, cancellation, etc., of the orders passed by the authority dated February 13, 1996, August 3, 1999, September 7, 1999, anda communication dated November...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 24 2004

Saturday Club Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commr., Service Tax Cell

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-24-2004

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Section 65; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2005)1CALLT575(HC),2005(180)ELT437(Cal),2006[3]STR305

Advocate for Respondent : D.K. Shome and ;B. Samaddar, Advs.

Amitava Lala, J. 1. This writ petition has been made by the Saturday Club Limited, a well-known club of the city of Calcutta (Kolkata) by the pen of the then Secretary and authorised representative of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2005

Jiwanram Sheoduttrai Vs. Cit

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-02-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)199CTR(Cal)98,[2006]279ITR512(Cal),[2005]148TAXMAN555(Cal)

D.K. Seth, J. The Question:The question involved in this appeal is:'Whether on a true and proper construction of the contract with the Indian Railways and their letters dated 3-5-1986 and 15-4-1988 the appellant is entitled to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2003

Bhagabati Developers P. Ltd. Vs. Peerless General Finance and Investme ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-24-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397 and 398

Reported in : [2005]123CompCas296(Cal),[2006]65SCL55(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Pranab Kr. Roy, ; Pranit Kr. Roy and ; A.N. Chunder, Advs. for respondent No. 1, ;Bhaskar Gupta and ; Abhijit Chatterjee, Advs. for respondent No. 2, ;P.C. Sen and ; R.R. Sen, Advs. for respondent No

Alok Kumar Basu, J.1. In these two appeals preferred by the appellant, Bhagabati Developers Pvt. Ltd., under the leave granted by the hon'ble Supreme Court contained in its order dated April 26, 1996, challenging the judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2012

Lalit Kumar Khettry Vs. Smt. Haimanti Deb Roy and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-03-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Soumen Sen, J. The order allowing substitution is a subject-matter of challenge in this revisional application. The original plaintiff instituted a suit for eviction. The plaintiff expired after the conclusion of his evidence on October 21,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2012

Ashoke Paul Vs. State Bank of India

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-04-2012

Subject : MRTP

GA No.3329 of 2011 WITH CS No.157 of 1998 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE ASHOKE PAUL Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE MAHARAJ SINHA Date :4. January 2012. For the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2000

The Union of India and ors. Vs. Poddar Udyog Limited and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-21-2000

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 299;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2;; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 38;; Kerala Abkari Act;; West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 4(1), 8 to 12 and 13(1);; Central Board of Revenue Act, 1963 - Section 3(1);; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rent Control Act, 1947;; Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Rules, 1974;; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 119

Reported in : (2000)2CALLT193(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Pal, ;Mr. Ranjan Deb, ;Mr. Ashis Chakraborty and ;Mr. S. Dube, Advs.

A. Kabir, J. 1. There will be an order in terms of prayer (a).For the sake of convenience and upon the consent of the parties the appeal and the stay application in respect of the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial