Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: dilip kumar · Page 1 of about 2,349 results (0.302 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 23 2001

Om Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-23-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 177 and 220; Inidan Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 215, 420, 467, 468 and 511; Constitution of India (Fifteenth Amendment - 1963, Forty Second Amendment - 1976) - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4385

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A.

O.P. Garg, J1. This writ petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred with unusual prayers that the proceedings in complaint cases Nos. 627 of 2000, 42 of 2001, 36 of 2001...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 14 1981

Dilip Kumar and anr. Vs. Board of Revenue and 2 ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-14-1981

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1981WLN516

1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, Dilip Kumar and Jugal Kishore, have challenged the validity of the order, dated June 23, 1978, Ex, 9, passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2012

N.Tamilvanan. Vs. the Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-23-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act - Section 81; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.Gunaseelan Muthiah, Adv

PRAYER Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 30.06.2008 passed in W.P.(MD)No.5769 of 2008 on the file of this Court.JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by G.M.AKABAR ALI, J.)1....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 29 2026

Bachchu Singh vs the State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-29-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Satish Kumar, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Ms. Upasana Bakshi, Mr. Dilip Kumar, Mr. Shashi Kumar

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3281/2026, CRL.M.A. 13335/2026 BACHCHU SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar and Mr. Ashish Kumar Siwas, Advs.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 1991

Bhoora Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-12-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 82, 83, 313, 366 and 386; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304B and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 4; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986 - Sections 113B; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4, 32, 32(1), 79 to 85, 101 to 105, 113A and 113B; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 23(1); Matrimonial Causes Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 2(1); Constitution of India - Article 20 and 20(1)

Reported in : 1992CriLJ2294

Advocate for Respondent : Govt. Adv. and ;Dilip Kumar, Adv.

B.L. Yadav, J. 1. Bhoora Singh, father-in-law of deceased Smt. Urmila has preferred Criminal Appeal No. 2854 of 1988 whereas there is a Reference No. 30 of 1988 for the confirmation of the death sentence as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1969

Bar, Das, Dey and Co. Vs. Sri Sri Ishwar Tarakeshwar Sib Thakur Jiu, S ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-14-1969

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Hindu Law; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 107; ;Tenancy Laws; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1954 - Sections 6(1), 27, 28 and 29; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1969Cal565,73CWN920

Advocate for Respondent : Bijay Bhose, ; Dilip Kumar Banerjee and ;Balin Kumar Basu, Advs.

S.N. Bagchi, J. 1. This Second Appeal is at the instance of the defendants in Title Suit No. 37 of 1960 of the Court of the Second Munsif, Chandernagore. The plaintiff proceeded with the following case....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2004

Birendra Kumar Vs. the State Election Commission and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jun-21-2004

Subject : ElectionLimitation

Acts : Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 140; Constitution of India - Article 243; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Advocate for Respondent : K.B. Nath, Adv. and Mahendra Thakur and Dilip Kumar Mishra, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5

Chandramauli Kumar Prasad, J.1. Petitioner as also respondent No. 4 contested for election to the office of the Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat, Katchore for which the election was held on 19.4.2001. In the said election, petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2005

B.K. Agarwal Vs. Smt. S. Meenakshi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-17-2005

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10, 10(3), 18 and 22

Reported in : 2005(6)ALD391; 2005(5)ALT698

Advocate for Respondent : Dilip Kumar Shirodkar, Adv.

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The unsuccessful tenant in R.C. No. 691/95 on the file of I Addl. Rent Controller, Hyderabad and R.A. No. 114/2000 on the file of Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, had...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2012

Sri Kartick Chandra Mondal Vs. Sri Sunil Kumar Purkait and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-18-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dilip Kumar Mondal

Tarun Kumar Gupta, J. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30th July, 2002, passed by learned Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Baruipur, South 24 Parganas in Title Appeal No.133 of 1997, reversing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2009

Ashok Kumar Vs. Amarjeet Singh Makhija

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-17-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT383

Advocate for Respondent : Dilip Kumar Shiradkar, Adv.

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Both the revisions are filed by the same petitioner, against the same respondent.2. The respondent filed O.S. No. 1419 of 2004 in the court of the VIII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial