Advanced Search Results

The State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Kamal Sengupta and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 4, 21, 22 and 22(3); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Constitution of India (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 46; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 114, 206 and 623 - Order 47, Rule 1; West Bengal (Revision of Pay and Allowance) Rules, 1981; West Bengal (Revision of Pay and Allowance) Rules, 1990 - Rule 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 226, 309, 323A and 323B

Reported in : 2008(4)AWC3764(SC); 2008(56)BLJR2317; (2009)1CALLT21(SC); JT2008(8)SC317; 2008(3)SLJ209(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Dhruv Mehta, ; Kumar Gupta, ; Ramanand Agarwal, ;

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Whether a Tribunal established under Section 4 of the Administrative Tribunals Act (for short `the Act') can review its decision on the basis of subsequent order/decision/judgment rendered by a coordinate or larger bench...

Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporati ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 328, 328(3), 328A and 471

Reported in : AIR2002SC1638; 2002(2)ALLMR(SC)932; 2002(5)BomCR121; (2002)3BOMLR596; JT2002(3)SC452; 2002(3)SCALE231; (2002)4SCC219; [2002]2SCR860; 2002(1)LC681(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Dhruv Mehta, ; Shobha and ; Anu Mehta, Advs. for S.K. Me

Raju, J.1. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay who lost before the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court, is the appellant herein against the judgment dated 30.8.85 in Appeal No.167 of...

Biswanath Poddar Vs. Archana Poddar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 16(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 21, Rules 99, 100 and 101; Evidence Act - Sections 91 and 92; West Bengal Premises Tenancy Rules - Rule 4

Reported in : AIR2001SC2849; JT2001(8)SC121; 2001(6)SCALE461; (2001)8SCC187

Advocate for Respondent : Dhruv Mehta, ; Ms. Anu Mehta and ; S.K. Mehta, Advs.

Santosh Hegde, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant herein who is the owner of one room in ground floor of premises No.42-A, Shakespeare Sarani, P.S. Park Street, Calcutta, had let out the said premises to Smt. Archana...

R.K. Bali (Dr.) Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; The Dental Council Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 6 and 7

Reported in : 2000IIAD(Delhi)673

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rakesh Tikku, ; Mr. R.L. Kohli, ; Mr. Dhruv Mehta a

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. In the above writ petition the election to the Presidentship of the Dental Council of India was challenged by the fourth respondent before the Govt. of India and the Govt. of India allowed...

M.N. Ojha and ors. Vs. Alok Kumar Srivastav and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Public Demand Recovery Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 409, 422 and 426; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : AIR2010SC201; 2009CriLJ4642; JT2009(10)SC590; 2009(11)SCALE573; (2009)9SCC682:2009AIRSCW5848

Advocate for Respondent : Gopal Singh and ; Chandan Kumar, Advs.

B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by grant of special leave is directed by the appellant, assailing the judgment and order dated 3.1.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal...

Kashinath S. Bandekar and ors. Vs. Atmaram Vassudeva Naique and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Portuguese Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Articles 515 and 516

Reported in : JT1997(3)SC651; 1997(3)SCALE31; (1997)9SCC279; [1997]2SCR1075

A.S. Anand, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature Bombay (Panaji Bench, Goa) dated 5th of July 1990.2. The case has a chequered history...

Smt. G. Kaushalya Devi Vs. Ghanshyamdas

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(3) and 22; Mysore House Rent and Accommodation Control Act, 1951 - Sections 8(3)

Reported in : AIR2000SC656; JT2000(1)SC127; (2000)IIMLJ104(SC); 2000(1)SCALE131; (2000)2SCC1; [2000]1SCR193

Advocate for Respondent : F.S. Nairman, Sr. Adv., ; Krishna Mandwal P. Venugopal, ; P

D.P. Wadhwa, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant is a tenant. His eviction from suit premises has been affirmed by the High Court in revision filed by him. Feeling aggrieved, he has filed this appeal.3. Respondent-landlord filed eviction...

Rajasthan GramIn Bank Vs. Bishan Lal Bairwa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17B

Reported in : (2009)IIILLJ235SC

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal by the Management is to an order, dated 2nd August, 2007, passed by an Appellate Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench in CSA (W)...

L.D. Nayar and Sons Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 3, 4 and 7; Rent Control Act; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 11, 14 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR2008Delhi179; 151(2008)DLT27

Advocate for Respondent : Dhruv Mehta, ;

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The petitioner, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks a direction to quash proceedings and orders made under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971- hereafter called 'the...

Uttaranchal Forest Development Corpn. and anr. Vs. Jabar Singh and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6N; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6N, 10, 25F, 25K, 25L, 25N, 25N(1), 25N(7), 38, 74 and 75; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Rules, 1976; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 2(1); Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 2(12); Central Excises Act, 1944; Industrial Disputes Act, 1976; Uttar Pradesh Forest Corporation Act, 1974 - Sections 14, 14(1), 15 and 15(2); General Clauses Act; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136 and 226

Reported in : [2007(113)FLR1]; (2007)IILLJ95SC; 2007(3)MhLj354; 2006(13)SCALE558; (2007)2SCC112; [2007]2SCL423(SC); 2007(2)SLJ423(SC);

Advocate for Respondent : Rachana Srivastava, A.A.G., ; Dhruv Mehta, ; Harshvardhan Jh

AR. Lakshmanan, J. 1. Leave granted.2. A bunch of 38 appeals were filed by the State of Uttaranchal Forest Development. Corporation against the judgment and order dated 21.08.2003 by the High Court of Uttaranchal in Writ...