Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: dhote · Page 1 of about 156 results (0.086 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 13 2002

Sunil Vasantrao Phulbande and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-13-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 167(2), 173, 173(2) and 173(5); Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 22 and 25

Reported in : 2002(3)MhLj689

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Dhote, Addl. P.P.

ORDERD.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Patwardhan, learned Counsel for the applicants, and Shri Dhote, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the non-applicant.2. The present criminal application is moved by the applicants under Section 439 of Code of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1993

Pwd Sc, St and Obc Employees Council and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-16-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25(F), 25(G) and 33(1); Industrial Disputes Rules - Rule 81; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 20, 21, 22 and 25(N)

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ1192Bom

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Deshpande, Adv.

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment shall govern Writ Petition Nos. 2039/91, 1415/91 and 2459/91. These three petitions have been filed at the instance of the workmen and/ or their Union challenging the common judgment passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2007

Mahatma Jyotiba Fule Adiwasi Magasvargiya Gruha Nirman Sahakari Sansth ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-04-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Revenue Code; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 16 and 21

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR76; 2007(5)MhLj256

Advocate for Respondent : S.Y. Deopujari, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3

A.B. Chaudhari, J.1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.2. On 30-4-2007 Civil Applications No. 2563 of 2007 and 2761 of 2007 for final disposal of writ petition and for giving directions to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 28 1973

Laxminarayan and anr. Vs. Returning Officer and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-28-1973

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 98, 159, 160, 161 and 162; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 116-A

Reported in : AIR1974SC66; (1974)3SCC425; [1974]1SCR822

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Sen, ; V.R. Manohar, ; B.K. De, ;

S.N. Dwivedi, J.1. The appellants, Laxminarayan and Marotrao, filed an election petition challenging the election of Jambuwantrao Dhote to the Lok Sabha from 21 Nagpur Parliamentary Constituency. There were five candidates in the run. Dhote was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 2006

Arvind Wamanrao Pendharkar (Deceased) (Through L.Rs. Sow. Sunita Arvin ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-19-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Civil Services (Pay) Rules, 1981 - Rules 11, 40 and 41; Maharashtra Civil Services (Pay) Rules 1982 - Rule 11; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 39 and 226

Reported in : 2007(1)BomCR287; 2006(5)MhLj85

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Dhote, Assistant Government Pleader

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. After the matter was closed on 19th June 2006, on 20th June 2006, the learned Senior Advocate with Shri Hedaoo, Advocate appeared and made a request to grant him further hearing in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2006

Tumsar Sahakari Shetki Kharedi Vikri Samiti Ltd. Vs. Collector and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-23-2006

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 144B, 144D(2), 144D(3), 144Y and 144Y(2)

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR583; 2006(5)BomCR346; 2006(3)MhLj659

Advocate for Respondent : Dhote, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

D.D. Sinha, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of the parties. 2. Heard Mr. S. Paliwal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dhote, learned AGP, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 3....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2002

Keki Bomi Dadiseth and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-17-2002

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 16(1), 17, 17(1), (2), (3) and (4), 20 and 34(1); Companies Act, 1956; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 254 and 482; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 141; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rules 54, 55 and 55(6); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)761; 2002(3)MhLj246

Advocate for Respondent : N.S. Jog, ;;;K.S. Dhote and ;D.B. Patel, Additional Public Prosecutors

1. Heard Shri Manohar, learned Senior Counsel for thepetitioners, and Mrs. Jog, Shri Jichkar, Shri Loney,Shri Dhote and Shri Patel, learned Additional PublicProsecutors for the respondent State.2. In all these matters, the accused/Directors are ofM/s. Brooke...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2007

Eknath S/O Vitthal Wakle Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-05-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR1947; 2008CriLJ662

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Dhote, APP

K.J. Rohee, J.1. The appellant has challenged his conviction for the offence punishable Under Section 302 of IPC and sentence of imprisonment for life imposed by the Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial No.84/1992 decided on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2003

Shreyans Industries Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-12-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 10

Reported in : 2004(1)MhLj50

Advocate for Respondent : K. Dhote, Asst. Government Pleader

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of Shri Purohit, learned Counsel for the appellant, and Shri Dhote, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.2. Shri Purohit, learned Counsel for the appellant/plaintiff, states...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2006

Sunil S/O Ramrao Paraskar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-09-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 174, 197, 197(3), 258 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 166, 167, 201, 217, 219 and 302

Reported in : 2006(6)MhLj690

Advocate for Respondent : K.S. Dhote, APP

K.J. Rohee, J.1. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.2. By this application under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code read with Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the applicant seeks...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial